Louis Saha or Ricardo Fuller ?

Which one would you have ?

Ricardo Fuller is 32 years of age and has vast Premier League experience with Stoke proving a tough physical with defenders standing at 6ft 3in tall ! His wages may an issue !

Louis Saha is without doubt could easily play in the Championship, Not the tallet striker around but just like Jason Roberts did for Reading last year do you think he would be willing to drop down a division and also his wages would be an issue and he is getting on a bit just like Fuller at 33 years of age !

If would could afford one of there wages which one would you have ? A tough call I think ! Both have there advantages ?

Saha too injury prone. Fuller would be quality

Louis Saha for me...if this is a choice.

Due to the fact that we potentially have Miller, Earnie, Mason, Velikonja and Bellamy at the start of the season, I'd have to go for Fuller.

Ricardo Fuller.

More powerful on the pitch, better with his head, has a killer finish (like Saha), and won't demand a ridiculous wage.

Would love to see him here.

I would have to agree, Saha is a great player but on massive wages ! So for me as well I would say Fuller just because he is more powerful in the air and could easily help us in the Championship !

Check out my other post comparison ! About "Danny Gabbidon or Roger Johnson ?"

Fuller.

Saha any day, hes quality in the Prem, never mind 2nd tier

Saha any day, hes quality in the Prem, never mind 2nd tier

But Championship football is a lot more physical and tougher on the legs, Vukcic said it was hard to adapt from the Premier League footie to Championship.

Fuller, without doubt.

saha,much better finisher,better team player ...fuller scores goals but is one blinkered fucker .

Saha by a mile

Saha with ease....

Saha would be my choise

King Louis, all day long. Can't even compare him to Fuller. Even his injury record has improved recently!