Sun Jul 08, 2012 4:59 pm
dazzyt wrote:castleblue wrote:dazzyt wrote:..........
The problem is a lot of fans get the impression we are shit stirring when we are only saying what we are seeing develop, so far everything we are saying seems to be happening including what looks like Keogh going to Bristol C and the goal posts being moved to suit with regards to signings.."10,8,5 new players",I think the club has put itself in a very awkward situation,If they turned around and said look"we are putting the rebrand on hold but will continue to invest I believe there would be a new sense of belief among supporters which would only drive the team on,I know it's not going to happen but I can dream .we will have to wait and see I suppose
And that sums up the position of the anti investment brigade perfectly i.e. we would be pro investment if it means we can have the blue shirts, in other words have the investment completly on our terms. There is another way for the anti investment brigade to get their wishes and that's go a find an investor who is prepared to put £100m into the club.
Speak for yourself when it comes to a new sense of belief because personally I have complete confidence in MM, his backroom team and this squad of players and I don't need £100m or a blue shirt to believe in them.
I don't think I will be by myself either.
Here he goes again....anti investment?????,you should be writing for the sun you twist everything you read.
Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:08 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:castleblue wrote:dazzyt wrote:..........
The problem is a lot of fans get the impression we are shit stirring when we are only saying what we are seeing develop, so far everything we are saying seems to be happening including what looks like Keogh going to Bristol C and the goal posts being moved to suit with regards to signings.."10,8,5 new players",I think the club has put itself in a very awkward situation,If they turned around and said look"we are putting the rebrand on hold but will continue to invest I believe there would be a new sense of belief among supporters which would only drive the team on,I know it's not going to happen but I can dream .we will have to wait and see I suppose
And that sums up the position of the anti investment brigade perfectly i.e. we would be pro investment if it means we can have the blue shirts, in other words have the investment completly on our terms. There is another way for the anti investment brigade to get their wishes and that's go a find an investor who is prepared to put £100m into the club.
Speak for yourself when it comes to a new sense of belief because personally I have complete confidence in MM, his backroom team and this squad of players and I don't need £100m or a blue shirt to believe in them.
I don't think I will be by myself either.
Here he goes again....anti investment?????,you should be writing for the sun you twist everything you read.
He is not twisting anything. The investment relied on rebranding by saying your against the rebranding therefore means you dont want the investment. You cant have the investment on your terms unless you want to find a new owner. VT feels that we have to rebrand to make us more profitable otherwise he doesnt see the point of this investment
Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:20 pm
dazzyt wrote:castleblue wrote:dazzyt wrote:..........
The problem is a lot of fans get the impression we are shit stirring when we are only saying what we are seeing develop, so far everything we are saying seems to be happening including what looks like Keogh going to Bristol C and the goal posts being moved to suit with regards to signings.."10,8,5 new players",I think the club has put itself in a very awkward situation,If they turned around and said look"we are putting the rebrand on hold but will continue to invest I believe there would be a new sense of belief among supporters which would only drive the team on,I know it's not going to happen but I can dream .we will have to wait and see I suppose
And that sums up the position of the anti investment brigade perfectly i.e. we would be pro investment if it means we can have the blue shirts, in other words have the investment completly on our terms. There is another way for the anti investment brigade to get their wishes and that's go a find an investor who is prepared to put £100m into the club.
Speak for yourself when it comes to a new sense of belief because personally I have complete confidence in MM, his backroom team and this squad of players and I don't need £100m or a blue shirt to believe in them.
I don't think I will be by myself either.
Here he goes again....anti investment?????,you should be writing for the sun you twist everything you read.
Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:23 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:castleblue wrote:dazzyt wrote:..........
The problem is a lot of fans get the impression we are shit stirring when we are only saying what we are seeing develop, so far everything we are saying seems to be happening including what looks like Keogh going to Bristol C and the goal posts being moved to suit with regards to signings.."10,8,5 new players",I think the club has put itself in a very awkward situation,If they turned around and said look"we are putting the rebrand on hold but will continue to invest I believe there would be a new sense of belief among supporters which would only drive the team on,I know it's not going to happen but I can dream .we will have to wait and see I suppose
And that sums up the position of the anti investment brigade perfectly i.e. we would be pro investment if it means we can have the blue shirts, in other words have the investment completly on our terms. There is another way for the anti investment brigade to get their wishes and that's go a find an investor who is prepared to put £100m into the club.
Speak for yourself when it comes to a new sense of belief because personally I have complete confidence in MM, his backroom team and this squad of players and I don't need £100m or a blue shirt to believe in them.
I don't think I will be by myself either.
Here he goes again....anti investment?????,you should be writing for the sun you twist everything you read.
He is not twisting anything. The investment relied on rebranding by saying your against the rebranding therefore means you dont want the investment. You cant have the investment on your terms unless you want to find a new owner. VT feels that we have to rebrand to make us more profitable otherwise he doesnt see the point of this investment
Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:28 pm
castleblue wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:castleblue wrote:dazzyt wrote:..........
The problem is a lot of fans get the impression we are shit stirring when we are only saying what we are seeing develop, so far everything we are saying seems to be happening including what looks like Keogh going to Bristol C and the goal posts being moved to suit with regards to signings.."10,8,5 new players",I think the club has put itself in a very awkward situation,If they turned around and said look"we are putting the rebrand on hold but will continue to invest I believe there would be a new sense of belief among supporters which would only drive the team on,I know it's not going to happen but I can dream .we will have to wait and see I suppose
And that sums up the position of the anti investment brigade perfectly i.e. we would be pro investment if it means we can have the blue shirts, in other words have the investment completly on our terms. There is another way for the anti investment brigade to get their wishes and that's go a find an investor who is prepared to put £100m into the club.
Speak for yourself when it comes to a new sense of belief because personally I have complete confidence in MM, his backroom team and this squad of players and I don't need £100m or a blue shirt to believe in them.
I don't think I will be by myself either.
Here he goes again....anti investment?????,you should be writing for the sun you twist everything you read.
He is not twisting anything. The investment relied on rebranding by saying your against the rebranding therefore means you dont want the investment. You cant have the investment on your terms unless you want to find a new owner. VT feels that we have to rebrand to make us more profitable otherwise he doesnt see the point of this investment
Thanks but don't worry whenever you try to discuss this subject with Dazz he will accuse you of twisting things. But it twists nothing by saying this guy wants the investment completely on his own terms.
Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:31 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:castleblue wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:castleblue wrote:dazzyt wrote:..........
The problem is a lot of fans get the impression we are shit stirring when we are only saying what we are seeing develop, so far everything we are saying seems to be happening including what looks like Keogh going to Bristol C and the goal posts being moved to suit with regards to signings.."10,8,5 new players",I think the club has put itself in a very awkward situation,If they turned around and said look"we are putting the rebrand on hold but will continue to invest I believe there would be a new sense of belief among supporters which would only drive the team on,I know it's not going to happen but I can dream .we will have to wait and see I suppose
And that sums up the position of the anti investment brigade perfectly i.e. we would be pro investment if it means we can have the blue shirts, in other words have the investment completly on our terms. There is another way for the anti investment brigade to get their wishes and that's go a find an investor who is prepared to put £100m into the club.
Speak for yourself when it comes to a new sense of belief because personally I have complete confidence in MM, his backroom team and this squad of players and I don't need £100m or a blue shirt to believe in them.
I don't think I will be by myself either.
Here he goes again....anti investment?????,you should be writing for the sun you twist everything you read.
He is not twisting anything. The investment relied on rebranding by saying your against the rebranding therefore means you dont want the investment. You cant have the investment on your terms unless you want to find a new owner. VT feels that we have to rebrand to make us more profitable otherwise he doesnt see the point of this investment
Thanks but don't worry whenever you try to discuss this subject with Dazz he will accuse you of twisting things. But it twists nothing by saying this guy wants the investment completely on his own terms.
You are all deluded and when this club becomes unrecognizable I hope you will stand up and say you were wrong.
Exactlly everyone wants everything when it suits them
Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:50 pm
dazzyt wrote:
You are all deluded and when this club becomes unrecognizable I hope you will stand up and say you were wrong.
Exactlly everyone wants everything when it suits them
Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:51 pm
[/quote]Exactlly everyone wants everything when it suits them
Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:58 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:Exactlly everyone wants everything when it suits them
Sun Jul 08, 2012 6:23 pm