Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:23 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Clutching at straws NJ.
Anyway the 5% means you still shafted your local businesses.
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:26 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:You only seem to care when you think a fellow Cardiff fan may be on to something and then suddenly dont care when its proves hes not.
Doesn't prove anything. Semantics as the result is creditors get screwed over. Dress it up all you want
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:29 pm
waddle wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:You only seem to care when you think a fellow Cardiff fan may be on to something and then suddenly dont care when its proves hes not.
Doesn't prove anything. Semantics as the result is creditors get screwed over. Dress it up all you want
you really are having a nightmare on this thread mate
even worse than baked who is still arguing the toss even though he's been proved wrong in black and white and is still trying to argue
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:32 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:waddle wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:You only seem to care when you think a fellow Cardiff fan may be on to something and then suddenly dont care when its proves hes not.
Doesn't prove anything. Semantics as the result is creditors get screwed over. Dress it up all you want
you really are having a nightmare on this thread mate
even worse than baked who is still arguing the toss even though he's been proved wrong in black and white and is still trying to argue
Afraid not wads. The theme is that creditors get screwed over. Now you can call that what you want but the result is the same
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:38 pm
NJ73 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:waddle wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:You only seem to care when you think a fellow Cardiff fan may be on to something and then suddenly dont care when its proves hes not.
Doesn't prove anything. Semantics as the result is creditors get screwed over. Dress it up all you want
you really are having a nightmare on this thread mate
even worse than baked who is still arguing the toss even though he's been proved wrong in black and white and is still trying to argue
Afraid not wads. The theme is that creditors get screwed over. Now you can call that what you want but the result is the same
Again, much like Langston only on a much, much smaller scale.
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:43 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:waddle wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:You only seem to care when you think a fellow Cardiff fan may be on to something and then suddenly dont care when its proves hes not.
Doesn't prove anything. Semantics as the result is creditors get screwed over. Dress it up all you want
you really are having a nightmare on this thread mate
even worse than baked who is still arguing the toss even though he's been proved wrong in black and white and is still trying to argue
Afraid not wads. The theme is that creditors get screwed over. Now you can call that what you want but the result is the same
Again, much like Langston only on a much, much smaller scale.
So when we get to the crunch you deflect to Langston again. Don't forget this was about Swansea and started by one of your own. Turned into Groundhog day so my work here is done. Got to finally out jacktragic too so a good night in all.
See wads, hardly a nightmare as when it comes to it there was no defence, even if we have to call it cva and not admin to keep the pedantic amongst us happy
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:45 pm
NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Clutching at straws NJ.
Anyway the 5% means you still shafted your local businesses.
Did you not read the OP?
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:46 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Clutching at straws NJ.
Anyway the 5% means you still shafted your local businesses.
Did you not read the OP?
Yep
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:49 pm
NJ73 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:waddle wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Doesn't prove anything. Semantics as the result is creditors get screwed over. Dress it up all you want
you really are having a nightmare on this thread mate
even worse than baked who is still arguing the toss even though he's been proved wrong in black and white and is still trying to argue
Afraid not wads. The theme is that creditors get screwed over. Now you can call that what you want but the result is the same
Again, much like Langston only on a much, much smaller scale.
So when we get to the crunch you deflect to Langston again. Don't forget this was about Swansea and started by one of your own. Turned into Groundhog day so my work here is done. Got to finally out jacktragic too so a good night in all.
See wads, hardly a nightmare as when it comes to it there was no defence, even if we have to call it cva and not admin to keep the pedantic amongst us happy
What crunch? What on earth are you drivelling on about? You have spent this thread criticising Swansea for "screwing over creditors" when in fact your club is in the process of doing it on an enormous scale.
That particular moral high ground has been emphatically lost.
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:54 pm
NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Clutching at straws NJ.
Anyway the 5% means you still shafted your local businesses.
Did you not read the OP?
Yep
Do you need it explaining to you in smaller words?
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:56 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:We weren't taking about Cardiff it was a Swansea thread. The clue was in the title. I've explained a few times the difference between Langston and your situation but you choose to ignore it. So i wasn't after claiming any moral high ground, the crunch was that when it comes down to it a cva generally has the same result as admin.
You lose the thread very easily nj, no wonder I had you tied up in knots last night
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:58 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Clutching at straws NJ.
Anyway the 5% means you still shafted your local businesses.
Did you not read the OP?
Yep
Do you need it explaining to you in smaller words?
£1.7 million in unsecured loans is a lot of pies.
That is the OP is stating shit.
Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:01 pm
Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:02 pm
NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Clutching at straws NJ.
Anyway the 5% means you still shafted your local businesses.
Did you not read the OP?
Yep
Do you need it explaining to you in smaller words?
£1.7 million in unsecured loans is a lot of pies.
That is the OP is stating shit.
Really, care to give me the figures then? I'll give you one for starters, £800k was to Mel Nurse for a debt he bought off Ninth Floor for around £50k. Over to you.
Unless of course you don't actually have any evidence to back up your theory that the OP is stating shit?
Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:08 pm
NJ73 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:We weren't taking about Cardiff it was a Swansea thread. The clue was in the title. I've explained a few times the difference between Langston and your situation but you choose to ignore it. So i wasn't after claiming any moral high ground, the crunch was that when it comes down to it a cva generally has the same result as admin.
You lose the thread very easily nj, no wonder I had you tied up in knots last night
Indeed it was a Swansea thread and I was pointing out your complete hypocrisy. To say Hammam (I assume you're accepting he is Langston) shouldn't be paid because he racked up the debt is nonsense. In fact, try taking that to court.
So to be judgemental on the previous actions of SCFC was indeed you trying to take the moral high ground on the basis that you think Langston shouldn't be paid. Which is as I said, utter nonsense.
You've had a mare here but your obviously quite enlarged ego would never allow you to acknowledge that.
Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:13 pm
NJ73 wrote:That's my lot.
I'll leave two clowns to it for the night.
Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:21 pm
RoathMagic wrote:We are about to do the same but for 20 times that amount to Sam Hammam and then have a go at them for doing it 11 years ago for 800k.