Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: 82m in debt

Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:34 pm

Bluebird64 wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:Whatever the debt why get do worked up about it when the bulk of it is owed to our Malaysian backers and they have just announced they are in it for the long term. Let them worry about the finances and we can worry about the team

What you are forgetting is that it has tripled because they have just sat back and let it accumulate.Its their debt so they can pay. :ayatollah:


Not forgetting just not worried about it. And they are paying are they not?

Re: 82m in debt

Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:35 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:Whatever the debt why get do worked up about it when the bulk of it is owed to our Malaysian backers and they have just announced they are in it for the long term. Let them worry about the finances and we can worry about the team

What you are forgetting is that it has tripled because they have just sat back and let it accumulate.Its their debt so they can pay. :ayatollah:


Not forgetting just not worried about it. And they are paying are they not?

And so they should. Its their mess. :ayatollah:

Re: 82m in debt

Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:37 pm

Bluebird64 wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:Whatever the debt why get do worked up about it when the bulk of it is owed to our Malaysian backers and they have just announced they are in it for the long term. Let them worry about the finances and we can worry about the team

What you are forgetting is that it has tripled because they have just sat back and let it accumulate.Its their debt so they can pay. :ayatollah:


Not forgetting just not worried about it. And they are paying are they not?

And so they should. Its their mess. :ayatollah:


And Sams

Re: 82m in debt

Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:01 pm

Beans wrote:Have anyone got proof of this. Or is it more made up bullshit to try turn people against our owners ?


Like u all said when Carl stated £72 mill in debt and then Whiltey confirmed it.

The accounts show £72 mill in debt, they are old and the debt is rising fast, confirmed by Allan Whitley.

Who is running our club ?

Who is totally in charge and have been for 2 years ?

Re: 82m in debt

Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:01 pm

Beans wrote:Have anyone got proof of this. Or is it more made up bullshit to try turn people against our owners ?


Like u all said when Carl stated £72 mill in debt and then Whiltey confirmed it.

The accounts show £72 mill in debt, they are old and the debt is rising fast, confirmed by Allan Whitley.

Who is running our club ?

Who is totally in charge and have been for 2 years ?

Re: 82m in debt

Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:02 pm

PtB wrote:
jezzy666 wrote:
PtB wrote:
jezzy666 wrote:
Beans wrote:Have anyone got proof of this. Or is it more made up bullshit to try turn people against our owners ?


made up

Behave!!!

proof?

Look at the last set of accounts and do the sums.

We're losing over a million a month, it ain't hard to work out. It's ok though, the Chinese are about to bail us out when they buy a trillion jerseys.


Correct, the correct debt is well over £80 mill, no lies/no bull shit.

Re: 82m in debt

Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:03 pm

Bluebird64 wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:Whatever the debt why get do worked up about it when the bulk of it is owed to our Malaysian backers and they have just announced they are in it for the long term. Let them worry about the finances and we can worry about the team

What you are forgetting is that it has tripled because they have just sat back and let it accumulate.Its their debt so they can pay. :ayatollah:


Correct they are responsible for most of the current debts.

Re: 82m in debt

Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:17 pm

is it correct Ray Ransoms debt is being cleared via the sale of players and a percentage of such sales are reducing the debt as well as regular payments also reducing this debt?
Is it correct that PMG's debt is being cleared by regular payments and is coming down and will be gone within 18 months?
Is it correct that an agreement has been reached in principle for the Langstone/Sam Hammam debt to be cleared?
Is it also correct that once this Langstone debt has been cleared VT will turn much of, if not all of his debt into shares therefore reducing the debt figure on the balance sheet?
In conclusion isn't this £82 Million figure being bandied about a bit of scaremongering ? and that soon it could be greatly reduced, but of course as has been said before its down to whether a full and final settlement is reached with Sam. Until then everything is conjecture. Over to you Sam :lol:

Lets just wait and see what happens over the coming weeks and months :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: 82m in debt

Sat Jun 09, 2012 9:04 pm

ihatealiens wrote:is it correct Ray Ransoms debt is being cleared via the sale of players and a percentage of such sales are reducing the debt as well as regular payments also reducing this debt?
Is it correct that PMG's debt is being cleared by regular payments and is coming down and will be gone within 18 months?
Is it correct that an agreement has been reached in principle for the Langstone/Sam Hammam debt to be cleared?
Is it also correct that once this Langstone debt has been cleared VT will turn much of, if not all of his debt into shares therefore reducing the debt figure on the balance sheet?
In conclusion isn't this £82 Million figure being bandied about a bit of scaremongering ? and that soon it could be greatly reduced, but of course as has been said before its down to whether a full and final settlement is reached with Sam. Until then everything is conjecture. Over to you Sam :lol:

Lets just wait and see what happens over the coming weeks and months :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:



Wrong it is not being reduced by regular payments,regarding Ray Ranson, it will only be reduced on a sale of a player, thats why we stopped selling.
No scaremongering just hard facts.