Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:48 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:54 pm
grangetownblue96 wrote:I don't not have a clue why people are still blaming sam hamman for this debt, sam offered the malaysians to pay him 10m and the debt will be cleared but the malaysians said they will pay 3m upfront and 7m in the future so I for one will not be blaming any of this on sam as I believe that the man still loves the club as he was at wembley and wants to be involved so as for the people who think they are sky sports and know everything by blaming sam I think you should no speak fiction and only speak fact.
The new kits are decent
The new bagde is poor
Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:56 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:56 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:58 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:and where do you get your facts from then
Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:02 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:06 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:07 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:People can blame him for putting us in that much debt in the first place
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:14 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:People can blame him for putting us in that much debt in the first place
How else was we going to climb leagues thats like saying we was 30million odd in debt the day he left now we are a near 80milion and what have we achieved in the meantime f**k ALL for another 50million on top
No matter what people think about him he achieved something all the others have not which is getting us up the leagues thats the hard truth of it all and im no sam fan either.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:19 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:19 pm
Leighton James Dont Like uS wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:and where do you get your facts from then
The same place where the Malaysians get theirs, We only had 20-29M debt pending on certain successes, When they arrived, yet wembley after wembleys more tv money than ever Our debt is now heading to the 80M ?????????????? Stinks!!!
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:22 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:27 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:29 pm
Bowmonster wrote:It is all Sam's fault we are in this position in the first place with his ridiculous spending back then and paying over the top wages.And allegedly borrowing off his own family with high interest rates.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:30 pm
Bowmonster wrote:It is all Sam's fault we are in this position in the first place with his ridiculous spending back then and paying over the top wages.And allegedly borrowing off his own family with high interest rates.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:30 pm
Bowmonster wrote:It is all Sam's fault we are in this position in the first place with his ridiculous spending back then and paying over the top wages.And allegedly borrowing off his own family with high interest rates.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:32 pm
gabbs wrote:I think Sam Hammam has been put into a position where he will have to accept this new offer, otherwise he may never see that money again, and I certainly cant see him defeating Vincent Tan in this battle for money.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:38 pm
pembroke allan wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:People can blame him for putting us in that much debt in the first place
How else was we going to climb leagues thats like saying we was 30million odd in debt the day he left now we are a near 80milion and what have we achieved in the meantime f**k ALL for another 50million on top
No matter what people think about him he achieved something all the others have not which is getting us up the leagues thats the hard truth of it all and im no sam fan either.
but miss point where would we be if malasians hadnt come in?? as for moving up leagues we been going up down since i can remember and being honest we would be going down now as sam was not trusted by anyone so stadium would never be built as long as he was on board thats a fact! sam put 3mil in as far as i am aware so how does 3mil turn into 24 mil actual debt to langstone?
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:39 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:gabbs wrote:I think Sam Hammam has been put into a position where he will have to accept this new offer, otherwise he may never see that money again, and I certainly cant see him defeating Vincent Tan in this battle for money.
I agree gabs but if he didnt agree to the lesser terms so to speak who would the blame be pointed at if the malaysians turned around and said they couldnt agree things so there pulling out but finding new investment in the meantime, i dont think he wanted this but had no choice in it all. I find it amazing that people still blame him for the debt @30million while climbing the leagues yet they still blame him for it all when hes taking 1/3 of what hes owed in drip feeds over a few seasons
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:42 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:Bowmonster wrote:It is all Sam's fault we are in this position in the first place with his ridiculous spending back then and paying over the top wages.And allegedly borrowing off his own family with high interest rates.
Lets go back to league 2 then if this is the case
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:45 pm
Bowmonster wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Bowmonster wrote:It is all Sam's fault we are in this position in the first place with his ridiculous spending back then and paying over the top wages.And allegedly borrowing off his own family with high interest rates.
Lets go back to league 2 then if this is the case
Thats what you blue boys want aint it, Make your mind up one minute your are anti Tan now you are saying we need them or it will be league 2
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:51 pm
gabbs wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:gabbs wrote:I think Sam Hammam has been put into a position where he will have to accept this new offer, otherwise he may never see that money again, and I certainly cant see him defeating Vincent Tan in this battle for money.
I agree gabs but if he didnt agree to the lesser terms so to speak who would the blame be pointed at if the malaysians turned around and said they couldnt agree things so there pulling out but finding new investment in the meantime, i dont think he wanted this but had no choice in it all. I find it amazing that people still blame him for the debt @30million while climbing the leagues yet they still blame him for it all when hes taking 1/3 of what hes owed in drip feeds over a few seasons
Thats the only danger about the Langstone deal, what will happen if Sam says no?
But many people on here say, Sam loves Cardiff City, if thats true will he want to see the club die by declining this last offer?
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:51 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:People can blame him for putting us in that much debt in the first place
How else was we going to climb leagues thats like saying we was 30million odd in debt the day he left now we are a near 80milion and what have we achieved in the meantime f**k ALL for another 50million on top
No matter what people think about him he achieved something all the others have not which is getting us up the leagues thats the hard truth of it all and im no sam fan either.
but miss point where would we be if malasians hadnt come in?? as for moving up leagues we been going up down since i can remember and being honest we would be going down now as sam was not trusted by anyone so stadium would never be built as long as he was on board thats a fact! sam put 3mil in as far as i am aware so how does 3mil turn into 24 mil actual debt to langstone?
We been in this league since he left so we have not been going up and down as you say, you say he put 3million pound in to the club only the guy bought the club and wrote off more to start with. hes achieved more than any other owner thats the facts here with a debt of 30million so how can you even compare it to are 80million now we owe yet we have achieved nothing along the way for 50million ,As for the stadium you will find its in another name company name to are normal trading one ask the riddler why . why do people cover up the truth by side tracking.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:58 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:gabbs wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:gabbs wrote:I think Sam Hammam has been put into a position where he will have to accept this new offer, otherwise he may never see that money again, and I certainly cant see him defeating Vincent Tan in this battle for money.
I agree gabs but if he didnt agree to the lesser terms so to speak who would the blame be pointed at if the malaysians turned around and said they couldnt agree things so there pulling out but finding new investment in the meantime, i dont think he wanted this but had no choice in it all. I find it amazing that people still blame him for the debt @30million while climbing the leagues yet they still blame him for it all when hes taking 1/3 of what hes owed in drip feeds over a few seasons
Thats the only danger about the Langstone deal, what will happen if Sam says no?
But many people on here say, Sam loves Cardiff City, if thats true will he want to see the club die by declining this last offer?
I have no idea if he loves the club or not im not a sam fan either tbh but just pointing out people are saying its his fault and the next breath they say the blue camp would rather stay blue in league two but if it wasnt for sam thats where we would still be thats the facts here. The other owners since then have achieved NOTHING bar another 50million debt yet we are still sittin in the same league the day sam left.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:04 pm
pembroke allan wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:People can blame him for putting us in that much debt in the first place
How else was we going to climb leagues thats like saying we was 30million odd in debt the day he left now we are a near 80milion and what have we achieved in the meantime f**k ALL for another 50million on top
No matter what people think about him he achieved something all the others have not which is getting us up the leagues thats the hard truth of it all and im no sam fan either.
but miss point where would we be if malasians hadnt come in?? as for moving up leagues we been going up down since i can remember and being honest we would be going down now as sam was not trusted by anyone so stadium would never be built as long as he was on board thats a fact! sam put 3mil in as far as i am aware so how does 3mil turn into 24 mil actual debt to langstone?
We been in this league since he left so we have not been going up and down as you say, you say he put 3million pound in to the club only the guy bought the club and wrote off more to start with. hes achieved more than any other owner thats the facts here with a debt of 30million so how can you even compare it to are 80million now we owe yet we have achieved nothing along the way for 50million ,As for the stadium you will find its in another name company name to are normal trading one ask the riddler why . why do people cover up the truth by side tracking.
why do people think sun shines out of sams ass? more to the point fact council refused to deal with him because there was no transparency in his financail accounts! that is still a fact, who is langstone?? sam ?? vt god knows! and what about naming rights to stadium that is add on to langastone oops mean sams bill! hence no name for stadium whilst agree about way things are done at city sam is no better than any others we have had as owners at least malasains havnt taken money out of club yet???? meant been up down well before sam and because we havnt done so since him has got nothing to do with him has it? as players all gone now?
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:11 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:gabbs wrote:I have no idea if he loves the club or not im not a sam fan either tbh but just pointing out people are saying its his fault and the next breath they say the blue camp would rather stay blue in league two but if it wasnt for sam thats where we would still be thats the facts here. The other owners since then have achieved NOTHING bar another 50million debt yet we are still sittin in the same league the day sam left.
yes it was his dreams that started the rise of Cardiff City into the championship, but I think he is what's now holding this club back with this situation with Langstone, once that debt disappears, then we can see Vincent Tan pushing this club to the next level.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:14 pm
grangetownblue96 wrote:I don't not have a clue why people are still blaming sam hamman for this debt, sam offered the malaysians to pay him 10m and the debt will be cleared but the malaysians said they will pay 3m upfront and 7m in the future so I for one will not be blaming any of this on sam as I believe that the man still loves the club as he was at wembley and wants to be involved so as for the people who think they are sky sports and know everything by blaming sam I think you should no speak fiction and only speak fact.
The new kits are decent
The new bagde is poor
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:19 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:gabbs wrote:I have no idea if he loves the club or not im not a sam fan either tbh but just pointing out people are saying its his fault and the next breath they say the blue camp would rather stay blue in league two but if it wasnt for sam thats where we would still be thats the facts here. The other owners since then have achieved NOTHING bar another 50million debt yet we are still sittin in the same league the day sam left.
yes it was his dreams that started the rise of Cardiff City into the championship, but I think he is what's now holding this club back with this situation with Langstone, once that debt disappears, then we can see Vincent Tan pushing this club to the next level.
The debts been settled thats why the rebrand has gone ahead, as for VT hes no diffrent to any other owner they will blag us till there blue in the face as proven with pure lies
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:28 pm
grangetownblue96 wrote:I don't not have a clue why people are still blaming sam hamman for this debt, sam offered the malaysians to pay him 10m and the debt will be cleared but the malaysians said they will pay 3m upfront and 7m in the future so I for one will not be blaming any of this on sam as I believe that the man still loves the club as he was at wembley and wants to be involved so as for the people who think they are sky sports and know everything by blaming sam I think you should no speak fiction and only speak fact.
The new kits are decent
The new bagde is poor