Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:33 pm
polo wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:polo wrote:Reading that statement there is no guaranteed 100 million at all.
Sold your soul for 100 pieces of silver which turned out to be chocolate money.
Show me their statement where they stated £100m. If it is then it was about clearing debt, building a training facility, extending the stadium and an amount for squad building. I know you're crap with figures but keep up
A figure given in the meeting by our CEO, Alan Whitley, as confirmed by various members present at the meeting, both sides of the colour debate.
All hes done is offered Sam 3 milion. No confirmation hes turned his 40m into equity.
And whats the point of extending the stadium if you dont invest in the team?
We couldnt sell out a playoff semi 2 years in a row.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:38 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:41 pm
polo wrote:pembroke allan wrote:The Lad wrote:Leighton James Dont Like uS wrote:d20 wrote:polo all the red heads will be moaning soon as possible when they see there wont be any big name signings...but they wanted it !!
Spot on.
We want it for stability not big names. Christ.
you are waisting time on people like polo as if vt put £ 100mil in there account they would say its not real>? and christ doesnt have anser to our debts either!!!
There is no 100m ffs. Nowhere near.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:42 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:46 pm
polo wrote:Well it better not to be too long term a plan the money we are losing each month because they dont know how to run a football club.
At 15-20m operating loss a season if we dont get promoted any time soon its back to square one even if he sticks to his word (debatable) and turns his 40m debt into equity.
Will need more than eastern luck and superstition then.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:49 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:polo wrote:Well it better not to be too long term a plan the money we are losing each month because they dont know how to run a football club.
At 15-20m operating loss a season if we dont get promoted any time soon its back to square one even if he sticks to his word (debatable) and turns his 40m debt into equity.
Will need more than eastern luck and superstition then.
Well then at least give them time instead of peddling What ifs and maybes, doom and gloom. History will tell us how successful we will be under the Malaysians, not you.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:00 pm
polo wrote:It was such a stupid hypethetical question it didnt warrant an answer, Alyn
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:02 pm
polo wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:polo wrote:Well it better not to be too long term a plan the money we are losing each month because they dont know how to run a football club.
At 15-20m operating loss a season if we dont get promoted any time soon its back to square one even if he sticks to his word (debatable) and turns his 40m debt into equity.
Will need more than eastern luck and superstition then.
Well then at least give them time instead of peddling What ifs and maybes, doom and gloom. History will tell us how successful we will be under the Malaysians, not you.
Why cant I express my disatisfaction at what I see as my club losing the most important part of its identity?
No different ifs or maybes to the happy clappers predicting we will be bigger than Real Madrid very soon
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:07 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:09 pm
polo wrote:"Making up nonsense to support your views"
Irony alert
Like your "Crowds of between 1900-3000 for much of the early 90s" bullshit.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:10 pm
Blazing Saddles wrote:polo wrote:"Making up nonsense to support your views"
Irony alert
Like your "Crowds of between 1900-3000 for much of the early 90s" bullshit.
Arguing with someone else now bullyboy??…….you really are the messageboard tosser aren't you!!
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:13 pm
polo wrote:"Making up nonsense to support your views"
Irony alert
Like your "Crowds of between 1900-3000 for much of the early 90s" bullshit.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:13 pm
polo wrote:Blazing Saddles wrote:polo wrote:"Making up nonsense to support your views"
Irony alert
Like your "Crowds of between 1900-3000 for much of the early 90s" bullshit.
Arguing with someone else now bullyboy??…….you really are the messageboard tosser aren't you!!
Just fighting my corner Spazmo
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:15 pm
polo wrote:Reading that statement there is no guaranteed 100 million at all.
Sold your soul for 100 pieces of silver which turned out to be chocolate money.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:15 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:15 pm
Blazing Saddles wrote:polo wrote:Blazing Saddles wrote:polo wrote:"Making up nonsense to support your views"
Irony alert
Like your "Crowds of between 1900-3000 for much of the early 90s" bullshit.
Arguing with someone else now bullyboy??…….you really are the messageboard tosser aren't you!!
Just fighting my corner Spazmo
You're a prize tw@t………….you cannot hold a conversation with anyone. Bit of a lack of education going on there we all think, but hey you don't need me to tell you that as I'm sure you have enough self awareness to realise you are a bit of a knob and a failure at all things in your life……………..da boch chi a nos da twypsin mawr.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:16 pm
Blazing Saddles wrote:polo wrote:"Making up nonsense to support your views"
Irony alert
Like your "Crowds of between 1900-3000 for much of the early 90s" bullshit.
Arguing with someone else now bullyboy??…….you really are the messageboard tosser aren't you!!
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:17 pm
polo wrote:Saddles I dont normally extend my messageboard hatred to real life but I really do hope you some serious ill.
Grotty little man.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:18 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:polo wrote:"Making up nonsense to support your views"
Irony alert
Like your "Crowds of between 1900-3000 for much of the early 90s" bullshit.
Given up on this as I've wrecked you so bringing up a different thread. Ok fair enough. Early 90s were 1990 and 1991. Avg crowds 3642 and 2946 respectively. Where's the bullshit Einstein? f**k me it's like groundhog day with you as all this was said last night. Remember I had to teach you about averages?
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:20 pm
Forever Blue wrote:polo wrote:Reading that statement there is no guaranteed 100 million at all.
Sold your soul for 100 pieces of silver which turned out to be chocolate money.
Correct Polo, there is no guarantee and when I asked if there was a guarantee they said they could not.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:20 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:26 pm
polo wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:polo wrote:"Making up nonsense to support your views"
Irony alert
Like your "Crowds of between 1900-3000 for much of the early 90s" bullshit.
Given up on this as I've wrecked you so bringing up a different thread. Ok fair enough. Early 90s were 1990 and 1991. Avg crowds 3642 and 2946 respectively. Where's the bullshit Einstein? f**k me it's like groundhog day with you as all this was said last night. Remember I had to teach you about averages?
Already established at 5482 but keep on making up nonsense to support your views.
You may have a wider vocabulary but I spanked you in the numbers game.
Get over it.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:29 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:36 pm
polo wrote:Let it go Carpe. Let it go.
You got done by a 'thick tw*t'
Let it
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:38 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:polo wrote:Let it go Carpe. Let it go.
You got done by a 'thick tw*t'
Let it
Still waiting for an answer. I can picture you right now head over your ears chanting la la la thereby keeping all those who better your arguments out of the world of Polo.
This is too easy
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:47 pm
polo wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:polo wrote:Let it go Carpe. Let it go.
You got done by a 'thick tw*t'
Let it
Still waiting for an answer. I can picture you right now head over your ears chanting la la la thereby keeping all those who better your arguments out of the world of Polo.
This is too easy
All the answers are in last nights thread. I dont wish to be bored to tears for a 2nd night.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:49 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:57 pm
polo wrote:Whilst you are out there check 92 and 93 are still early 90s and come back with the average.
Heres a clue. It isnt between 1900-3000.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:29 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:49 pm
Chip shop Alley wrote:Fook me what's going on in here! If you stick to the topic you will find that polo's point is factual. I see a lot of people hating on him because he explains himself really well and a lot of blockheaded individuals will deem him as a bad egg. But he has a point. Firstly the 100 mill. This is a non guaranteed amount , theres also no guarantee at this moment in time that the malaysians will turn our debt into equity/shares, they will only do so ONCE they start recieving positive revenues. In this case if the kit in asia goes tits up and the majority of malay ccfc sians decide to get fake kits thus not covering our current finances they could well seek other investors which could mean a multiple of things(I have hope that those with an indigo Quebec can figure that bit out for themselves)
Transfer kitty : I'll get straight to the point here with this one. For you "special Individuals" who think that after turning red we are gonna spend millions on players, prepare to be bitterly disappointed & I'm looking forward to those future contradictory posts and people waiting outside Carl's house with their pitchforks & flaming torches at how his information didn't turn out how it should've (his info btw is about as thorough as it gets on the interwebs and big thumbs up for committing the time/effort to do so)
So here's the possible math (non factual my opinion bla bla) 50mill VT DEBT (inc.7% interest?)10 mill. Langston. 8 mill. Training facilities. 1 mill. Advertising. 1.5mill * 12 Debt. = we've been screwed in the anus.
I'm being realistic. How about you?