Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:31 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:mjw6150 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:mjw6150 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:First off a large chunk of the money that's comes in from selling a shirt will go the manufacturer aswell as the shop it is being sold in so no we would not be getting £400 million
Doesn't affect it much. Could be more than 10 million if we really hit it off and become Asia's PL football team
You honestly believe we will sell more than 10 million shirts?? None of the premier league teams sell anywhere near that many shirts so how are we going to do it
By marketing ourselves as their club, a fusion of Welsh & Asian values..who you going to trust..CCFC season ticket holders or VT who has already become almost a billionaire from the Asian market?
It's not about trusting fans or vt (which right now is hard to do) it's about thinking realistically about this. WE WILL NEVER SELL MORE SHIRTS THAN UNITED OR MADRID
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:33 pm
Andy1927 wrote:mjw6150 wrote:By marketing ourselves as their club, a fusion of Welsh & Asian values..who you going to trust..CCFC season ticket holders or VT who has already become almost a billionaire from the Asian market?
CCFC season ticket holders thanks.... as why would I want to trust a man who has made millions on the back of a country run as a dictatorship, and yes I know it is now based on a constitutional monarchy and is no longer a communist state, but anyone who knows anything about Malaysia knows that to claim it to be democratic would be laughable.... The rumours to come out of Malaysia have been quite clear in how VT has made his money, and it is not on the back of fair trade that's for sure....
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:35 pm
polo wrote:
Whens the last time Liverpool got in the Champions league? Nevermind win their league (22 years and counting)?
Whens the last time Arsenal won a trophy? Cannot hold onto their best players.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:36 pm
Birchgrove wrote:I don't want to have a go at anyone on here but gulible is the only word that springs to mind
As an aside there was a picture doing the rounds a couple of weeks ago with two Swansea guys and about 20 guys from Bangkok all in Swansea kit, (insert ladyboy joke here) when you looked closer, they were not made by Adidas and cost $2 dollars each to make, Swansea didn't make a bean (other than publicity).
As for TV, yes Sky sell rights to Asia but Cardiff City can't, its not theirs to sell, otherwise Manchester United would have done it when Giggs was a lad. Get real
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:38 pm
ElyBlueAj wrote:£400m a year from shirt sales. You want to get yourself down to the doctors if you think that is anywhere near possible
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:41 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:41 pm
mjw6150 wrote:Birchgrove wrote:I don't want to have a go at anyone on here but gulible is the only word that springs to mind
As an aside there was a picture doing the rounds a couple of weeks ago with two Swansea guys and about 20 guys from Bangkok all in Swansea kit, (insert ladyboy joke here) when you looked closer, they were not made by Adidas and cost $2 dollars each to make, Swansea didn't make a bean (other than publicity).
As for TV, yes Sky sell rights to Asia but Cardiff City can't, its not theirs to sell, otherwise Manchester United would have done it when Giggs was a lad. Get real
You don't understand completely the strength and growth of the Asian market and you also completely misunderstand the TV rights process. I never said Cardiff would sell the rights but VT can buy them for his TV Company from whoever sells them and use it to publicise Cardiff over there.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:42 pm
mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:£400m a year from shirt sales. You want to get yourself down to the doctors if you think that is anywhere near possible
It's possible for Manchester United who sell between 1.2m & 1.5m shirts a year, at £40 a shirt that is £480m and £600m.
Obviously they don't sell them all for that much but a it can't be denied United have a fantastic merchandising machine going on.
Even just £40m a year from shirt sales would be huge for Cardiff and help us become a top club!
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:53 pm
SCFC wrote:You can be as big as Real Madrid, but you'll still have sold your soul to the devil.
(By the way your not going to be as big as Real Madrid, more like Crawley Town)
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:53 pm
Birchgrove wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Birchgrove wrote:I don't want to have a go at anyone on here but gulible is the only word that springs to mind
As an aside there was a picture doing the rounds a couple of weeks ago with two Swansea guys and about 20 guys from Bangkok all in Swansea kit, (insert ladyboy joke here) when you looked closer, they were not made by Adidas and cost $2 dollars each to make, Swansea didn't make a bean (other than publicity).
As for TV, yes Sky sell rights to Asia but Cardiff City can't, its not theirs to sell, otherwise Manchester United would have done it when Giggs was a lad. Get real
You don't understand completely the strength and growth of the Asian market and you also completely misunderstand the TV rights process. I never said Cardiff would sell the rights but VT can buy them for his TV Company from whoever sells them and use it to publicise Cardiff over there.
Of course he can and if my auntie had a set of bollocks she'd be my uncle.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:54 pm
Birchgrove wrote:mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:£400m a year from shirt sales. You want to get yourself down to the doctors if you think that is anywhere near possible
It's possible for Manchester United who sell between 1.2m & 1.5m shirts a year, at £40 a shirt that is £480m and £600m.
Obviously they don't sell them all for that much but a it can't be denied United have a fantastic merchandising machine going on.
Even just £40m a year from shirt sales would be huge for Cardiff and help us become a top club!
Deluded
Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:57 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:00 pm
mjw6150 wrote:Birchgrove wrote:mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:£400m a year from shirt sales. You want to get yourself down to the doctors if you think that is anywhere near possible
It's possible for Manchester United who sell between 1.2m & 1.5m shirts a year, at £40 a shirt that is £480m and £600m.
Obviously they don't sell them all for that much but a it can't be denied United have a fantastic merchandising machine going on.
Even just £40m a year from shirt sales would be huge for Cardiff and help us become a top club!
Deluded
So an extra £40m a year wouldn't help your beloved Swansea become a top club?
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:00 pm
ElyBlueAj wrote:These are a few facts. The 1.2 to 1.5 million shirts were sold over a four year period. Not annually. So roughly 350,000 a year. At just over £10 per shirt. £3.5m a year is a lot less than the £420m to £600m a year you were talking about. The colour change was never about selling shirts. It was simply Tan showing us who the boss is
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:02 pm
Birchgrove wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Birchgrove wrote:mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:£400m a year from shirt sales. You want to get yourself down to the doctors if you think that is anywhere near possible
It's possible for Manchester United who sell between 1.2m & 1.5m shirts a year, at £40 a shirt that is £480m and £600m.
Obviously they don't sell them all for that much but a it can't be denied United have a fantastic merchandising machine going on.
Even just £40m a year from shirt sales would be huge for Cardiff and help us become a top club!
Deluded
So an extra £40m a year wouldn't help your beloved Swansea become a top club?
So you've plucked a figure out of thin air
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:03 pm
mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:These are a few facts. The 1.2 to 1.5 million shirts were sold over a four year period. Not annually. So roughly 350,000 a year. At just over £10 per shirt. £3.5m a year is a lot less than the £420m to £600m a year you were talking about. The colour change was never about selling shirts. It was simply Tan showing us who the boss is
There is no way all those shirts went for £10 per shirt!
Even at £40 a shirt, and I may have got figures seriously wrong at first, it's still an extra £10m plus a year which is super. That's on top of sales of other merchandise.
and it is not a fact that Tan is doing it for that reason, that is just your opinion. There is no way Tan changed the kits to just show us who the boss was. He has business reasons and that much is obvious and what the whole post is about!
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:06 pm
mjw6150 wrote:mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:These are a few facts. The 1.2 to 1.5 million shirts were sold over a four year period. Not annually. So roughly 350,000 a year. At just over £10 per shirt. £3.5m a year is a lot less than the £420m to £600m a year you were talking about. The colour change was never about selling shirts. It was simply Tan showing us who the boss is
There is no way all those shirts went for £10 per shirt!
Even at £40 a shirt, and I may have got figures seriously wrong at first, it's still an extra £10m plus a year which is super. That's on top of sales of other merchandise.
and it is not a fact that Tan is doing it for that reason, that is just your opinion. There is no way Tan changed the kits to just show us who the boss was. He has business reasons and that much is obvious and what the whole post is about!
Having been in Madrid, new RM shirts sell for almost £100 in Madrid out there. So it can go the other way, too.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:06 pm
mjw6150 wrote:mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:These are a few facts. The 1.2 to 1.5 million shirts were sold over a four year period. Not annually. So roughly 350,000 a year. At just over £10 per shirt. £3.5m a year is a lot less than the £420m to £600m a year you were talking about. The colour change was never about selling shirts. It was simply Tan showing us who the boss is
There is no way all those shirts went for £10 per shirt!
Even at £40 a shirt, and I may have got figures seriously wrong at first, it's still an extra £10m plus a year which is super. That's on top of sales of other merchandise.
and it is not a fact that Tan is doing it for that reason, that is just your opinion. There is no way Tan changed the kits to just show us who the boss was. He has business reasons and that much is obvious and what the whole post is about!
Having been in Madrid, new RM shirts sell for almost £100 in Madrid out there. So it can go the other way, too.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:06 pm
mjw6150 wrote:mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:These are a few facts. The 1.2 to 1.5 million shirts were sold over a four year period. Not annually. So roughly 350,000 a year. At just over £10 per shirt. £3.5m a year is a lot less than the £420m to £600m a year you were talking about. The colour change was never about selling shirts. It was simply Tan showing us who the boss is
There is no way all those shirts went for £10 per shirt!
Even at £40 a shirt, and I may have got figures seriously wrong at first, it's still an extra £10m plus a year which is super. That's on top of sales of other merchandise.
and it is not a fact that Tan is doing it for that reason, that is just your opinion. There is no way Tan changed the kits to just show us who the boss was. He has business reasons and that much is obvious and what the whole post is about!
Having been in Madrid, new RM shirts sell for almost £100 in Madrid out there. So it can go the other way, too.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:09 pm
mjw6150 wrote:mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:These are a few facts. The 1.2 to 1.5 million shirts were sold over a four year period. Not annually. So roughly 350,000 a year. At just over £10 per shirt. £3.5m a year is a lot less than the £420m to £600m a year you were talking about. The colour change was never about selling shirts. It was simply Tan showing us who the boss is
There is no way all those shirts went for £10 per shirt!
Even at £40 a shirt, and I may have got figures seriously wrong at first, it's still an extra £10m plus a year which is super. That's on top of sales of other merchandise.
and it is not a fact that Tan is doing it for that reason, that is just your opinion. There is no way Tan changed the kits to just show us who the boss was. He has business reasons and that much is obvious and what the whole post is about!
Having been in Madrid, new RM shirts sell for almost £100 in Madrid out there. So it can go the other way, too.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:13 pm
ElyBlueAj wrote:mjw6150 wrote:mjw6150 wrote:ElyBlueAj wrote:These are a few facts. The 1.2 to 1.5 million shirts were sold over a four year period. Not annually. So roughly 350,000 a year. At just over £10 per shirt. £3.5m a year is a lot less than the £420m to £600m a year you were talking about. The colour change was never about selling shirts. It was simply Tan showing us who the boss is
There is no way all those shirts went for £10 per shirt!
Even at £40 a shirt, and I may have got figures seriously wrong at first, it's still an extra £10m plus a year which is super. That's on top of sales of other merchandise.
and it is not a fact that Tan is doing it for that reason, that is just your opinion. There is no way Tan changed the kits to just show us who the boss was. He has business reasons and that much is obvious and what the whole post is about!
Having been in Madrid, new RM shirts sell for almost £100 in Madrid out there. So it can go the other way, too.
But Real Madrid don't manufacture their shirts. Adidas do. Adidas are shirt sponsors. They pay real Madrid a set fee every year for the rights to sell their kit and merchandise.
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:19 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:23 pm
mjw6150 wrote:So VT is corrupt? You better be careful with comments like that.
And you've completely contradicted yourself, a dictatorship that is a consitutional monarchy!?!
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:26 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:28 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:33 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Your type of thread is making us look a laughing stock down west again. You are an embarrassment to the proud club we once was, before we sold our souls to the devil
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:37 pm
Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:48 pm
Igovernor wrote:Forget about the shirts, as has been stated VT has his own TV station, he will put City on pay per view, the malaysians and chinese will lap it up and that will just be the start
Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:04 pm
mjw6150 wrote:SCFC wrote:You can be as big as Real Madrid, but you'll still have sold your soul to the devil.
(By the way your not going to be as big as Real Madrid, more like Crawley Town)
I'd rather change colour than rip off all the local businesses in my local area
Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:23 pm
mjw6150 wrote:Stern wrote:Real Madrid ................................... r u on glue?
As above, just 1% of China being interested enough to buy a shirt is £400m a year. Add in Malaysia, Asia and the fact that VT will be marketing us as 'their' team and showing games live...it's a genius way around FFP.
I'm not happy about this, just trying to see the positives...and there are HUGE positives.