Ben wrote:i dont think sam will sign
jonah wrote:f**k Hamman he is a c**t, Held us to randsom for years, great chance to punch on in the new year and the cockroach will pull all the heart strings he only thinks about one thing HIMSELF
Owain wrote:jonah wrote:f**k Hamman he is a c**t, Held us to randsom for years, great chance to punch on in the new year and the cockroach will pull all the heart strings he only thinks about one thing HIMSELF
So Sam loses out on £10m while PR and the rest of the cronies make a shed load if they're shareholding gets bought out
Ben wrote:ohhh yer, 10mil or 20mil owed to same is like him losing £10 or £20
bugger all really lol
Wayne S wrote:Ben wrote:ohhh yer, 10mil or 20mil owed to same is like him losing £10 or £20
bugger all really lol
Have we had a breakdown to prove the debt to Langston is as high as mentioned? Always confused me that it got so high and have never seen proof that it was the figure mentioned.
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Wayne S wrote:Ben wrote:ohhh yer, 10mil or 20mil owed to same is like him losing £10 or £20
bugger all really lol
Have we had a breakdown to prove the debt to Langston is as high as mentioned? Always confused me that it got so high and have never seen proof that it was the figure mentioned.
When Ridsdale and Co. took over in 2007 they accepted the club had a debt of £15m capital and £9m naming rights to Langston. I presume they did their own due diligence beforehand.
Therefore it doesn't matter how the original £24m was spent the club have an unsecured liability for that amount to Langston, unless it is amended by the new agreement.
elliott wrote:Owain wrote:jonah wrote:f**k Hamman he is a c**t, Held us to randsom for years, great chance to punch on in the new year and the cockroach will pull all the heart strings he only thinks about one thing HIMSELF
So Sam loses out on £10m while PR and the rest of the cronies make a shed load if they're shareholding gets bought out
How is sam losing money we as a club could not have run that much debt up the only one to blame is sam and the 10mil is just his greed
Owain wrote:jonah wrote:f**k Hamman he is a c**t, Held us to randsom for years, great chance to punch on in the new year and the cockroach will pull all the heart strings he only thinks about one thing HIMSELF
So Sam loses out on £10m while PR and the rest of the cronies make a shed load if they're shareholding gets bought out
Uccello Azzurro wrote:Owain wrote:jonah wrote:f**k Hamman he is a c**t, Held us to randsom for years, great chance to punch on in the new year and the cockroach will pull all the heart strings he only thinks about one thing HIMSELF
So Sam loses out on £10m while PR and the rest of the cronies make a shed load if they're shareholding gets bought out
Like everything, the answer usually lies somewhere in the middle and both will have to compromise. PR "and his cronies" took their risk and deserve a slice for driving on in the face of difficulties. Risk-Return: that's just business..
Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot [Bot], Clickagy [Bot], Clusterman, cmorris1927, Don Keydick, Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Proximic [Bot] and 195 guests