Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

22 shots

Sat Mar 31, 2012 11:18 pm

on goal today,is that correct? CCFC

Re: 22 shots

Sat Mar 31, 2012 11:20 pm

taffy123 wrote:on goal today,is that correct? CCFC


No.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/match?id=318783&cc=5739

Re: 22 shots

Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:12 pm

NJ73 wrote:
taffy123 wrote:on goal today,is that correct? CCFC


No.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/match?id=318783&cc=5739

Thanks for putting us in our place then :?

Re: 22 shots

Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:08 pm

Cwmann_Bluebird wrote:
NJ73 wrote:
taffy123 wrote:on goal today,is that correct? CCFC


No.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/match?id=318783&cc=5739

Thanks for putting us in our place then :?


I simply answered the question. No need to be so touchy.

Re: 22 shots

Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:21 pm

It's not the first time mm has lost count on the number of shots.

Re: 22 shots

Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:45 pm

NJ73 wrote:
Cwmann_Bluebird wrote:
NJ73 wrote:
taffy123 wrote:on goal today,is that correct? CCFC


No.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/match?id=318783&cc=5739

Thanks for putting us in our place then :?


I simply answered the question. No need to be so touchy.

You're just so awkward about it. Couldn't you have just given the link? The resounding 'No.' wasn't really needed was it?

Re: 22 shots

Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:48 pm

Cwmann_Bluebird wrote:
NJ73 wrote:
Cwmann_Bluebird wrote:
NJ73 wrote:
taffy123 wrote:on goal today,is that correct? CCFC


No.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/match?id=318783&cc=5739

Thanks for putting us in our place then :?


I simply answered the question. No need to be so touchy.

You're just so awkward about it. Couldn't you have just given the link? The resounding 'No.' wasn't really needed was it?


Yes.

Re: 22 shots

Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:52 pm

NJ73 wrote:
Cwmann_Bluebird wrote:
NJ73 wrote:
Cwmann_Bluebird wrote:
NJ73 wrote:
taffy123 wrote:on goal today,is that correct? CCFC


No.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/match?id=318783&cc=5739

Thanks for putting us in our place then :?


I simply answered the question. No need to be so touchy.

You're just so awkward about it. Couldn't you have just given the link? The resounding 'No.' wasn't really needed was it?


Yes.

Cool beans!