Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:33 am
Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:43 am
Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:10 pm
Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:14 pm
forest lad wrote:I was gutted when we didn't sign him, I suspect it was a bullshit story at the time.
A good article from a pro who isn't full of himself.
It sounds as if a few of you haven't much time for your Trust which I find a bit odd. If you lifted it off them that's a bit out of order but to rub their noses in it is a bit over the top.
A very odd way to treat fellow fans.
Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:15 pm
forest lad wrote:I was gutted when we didn't sign him, I suspect it was a bullshit story at the time.
A good article from a pro who isn't full of himself.
It sounds as if a few of you haven't much time for your Trust which I find a bit odd. If you lifted it off them that's a bit out of order but to rub their noses in it is a bit over the top.
A very odd way to treat fellow fans.
Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:20 pm
Forever Blue wrote:forest lad wrote:I was gutted when we didn't sign him, I suspect it was a bullshit story at the time.
A good article from a pro who isn't full of himself.
It sounds as if a few of you haven't much time for your Trust which I find a bit odd. If you lifted it off them that's a bit out of order but to rub their noses in it is a bit over the top.
A very odd way to treat fellow fans.
I wont go in to it, but when they start backing our fans in time of troubles etc and stand up to our club in future if things are wrong, then they would get our full support, not worth talking about. They would not even speak out or march against the Riddler. I would rather not talk about them.
I have total respect for Newport's/Wrexham's and even Swansea's trust.
Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:26 pm
Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:29 pm
BigGwynram wrote:I think this needs looking at.They should set up a steering group to brainstorm some ideas over a working breakfeast. These ideas should then be passed on to the general committee who can then vote on and ratify thenext move which will be to ballot the whole membership for permission. These woll then need clarification by the legal branch who can check with all the other trulst in the
Country to slee if they have any similar problems. Hopefully we should hear the outcome some time in November.
Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:54 pm
forest lad wrote:BigGwynram wrote:I think this needs looking at.They should set up a steering group to brainstorm some ideas over a working breakfeast. These ideas should then be passed on to the general committee who can then vote on and ratify thenext move which will be to ballot the whole membership for permission. These woll then need clarification by the legal branch who can check with all the other trulst in the
Country to slee if they have any similar problems. Hopefully we should hear the outcome some time in November.
I see you're the type who likes his own way.
Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:59 pm
Xcasual wrote:forest lad wrote:BigGwynram wrote:I think this needs looking at.They should set up a steering group to brainstorm some ideas over a working breakfeast. These ideas should then be passed on to the general committee who can then vote on and ratify thenext move which will be to ballot the whole membership for permission. These woll then need clarification by the legal branch who can check with all the other trulst in the
Country to slee if they have any similar problems. Hopefully we should hear the outcome some time in November.
I see you're the type who likes his own way.
At 6ft 4" ,18 stone and ex Great Britain judo champ he usually gets it
Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:12 pm
forest lad wrote:
I know it's none of my business but as a Forest fan I wouldn't be too confident if fellow fans seemed to have a vendetta against each other.
Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:30 pm
Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:47 pm
thehumblegringo wrote:I'm sorry lads i agree with forest lad. As someone who is niether part of the trust or the forum bus, i think this bickering between supporters groups is at best silly!
I know it can sometimes work both ways and i dont know the ins and outs of it as i tend to distance myself from it but with regards to the interview personally i think it was out of order and merlin himself said so.
I'm sure a lot of time and effort went into producing the interview and i honestly dont see what is acheived by stealing the interview before its published!
Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:50 pm
Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:52 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:thehumblegringo wrote:I'm sorry lads i agree with forest lad. As someone who is niether part of the trust or the forum bus, i think this bickering between supporters groups is at best silly!
I know it can sometimes work both ways and i dont know the ins and outs of it as i tend to distance myself from it but with regards to the interview personally i think it was out of order and merlin himself said so.
I'm sure a lot of time and effort went into producing the interview and i honestly dont see what is acheived by stealing the interview before its published!
Cant find where Merlin said it was out of order but I do read that he gives credit to the MTDB and the Supporters Trust for the interview.
Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:55 pm
thehumblegringo wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:thehumblegringo wrote:I'm sorry lads i agree with forest lad. As someone who is niether part of the trust or the forum bus, i think this bickering between supporters groups is at best silly!
I know it can sometimes work both ways and i dont know the ins and outs of it as i tend to distance myself from it but with regards to the interview personally i think it was out of order and merlin himself said so.
I'm sure a lot of time and effort went into producing the interview and i honestly dont see what is acheived by stealing the interview before its published!
Cant find where Merlin said it was out of order but I do read that he gives credit to the MTDB and the Supporters Trust for the interview.
he said it on friday night
Sun Jan 22, 2012 6:50 pm