Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:41 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:43 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:44 pm
CityGent wrote:A representative of Cardiff City is meeting Mackie tonight in London just for preliminary talks. Jamie Mackie has already told him that he recently tried to secure an improved contract at Loftus Road. His words to CCFC are that he's on 18k a week and wanted 30k in a new deal, but obvioulsly the situation has all changed at QPR. The new contract story could be the players way of getting as much out of his next club as possible. There's a long way to go yet, but I was also told we've got two permanents and a loan lined up. Defender, striker and a"special"winger?
To be continued
Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:50 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:06 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:10 pm
carlccfc wrote:Tony I have been told the very same re: Mackie except the only difference is that the meeting is tomorrow but only a few hours difference so we are definitely being told very much the same
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:11 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:26 pm
CityGent wrote:Carl, I think his wages will be a massive stumbling point. It's already been mentioned that Malky has approached the board for more money. If Mackie is on a minimum 18k do you think City would be prepared to match that? I hope so, but it's debatable I think
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:33 pm
Rita Pidsdale wrote:CityGent wrote:Carl, I think his wages will be a massive stumbling point. It's already been mentioned that Malky has approached the board for more money. If Mackie is on a minimum 18k do you think City would be prepared to match that? I hope so, but it's debatable I think
Of course it's debatable, as anything is, what you mean I think is 'It's Doubtful' ?
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:34 pm
CityGent wrote:Rita Pidsdale wrote:CityGent wrote:Carl, I think his wages will be a massive stumbling point. It's already been mentioned that Malky has approached the board for more money. If Mackie is on a minimum 18k do you think City would be prepared to match that? I hope so, but it's debatable I think
Of course it's debatable, as anything is, what you mean I think is 'It's Doubtful' ?
Debatable in the context I've used it is a subtle version of doubtful, but thanks for clearing that up. I'm hopeful though, as my glass is half full, which is another meaning for'positive'
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:38 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:39 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:42 pm
Why in Gods name do we need another defender?
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:43 pm
angelis49 wrote:Why in Gods name do we need another defender?
Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:01 pm
CityGent wrote:Carl, I think his wages will be a massive stumbling point. It's already been mentioned that Malky has approached the board for more money. If Mackie is on a minimum 18k do you think City would be prepared to match that? I hope so, but it's debatable I think
Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:13 pm
CityGent wrote:Carl, I think his wages will be a massive stumbling point. It's already been mentioned that Malky has approached the board for more money. If Mackie is on a minimum 18k do you think City would be prepared to match that? I hope so, but it's debatable I think
Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:03 pm
CityGent wrote:A representative of Cardiff City is meeting Mackie tonight in London just for preliminary talks. Jamie Mackie has already told him that he recently tried to secure an improved contract at Loftus Road. His words to CCFC are that he's on 18k a week and wanted 30k in a new deal, but obvioulsly the situation has all changed at QPR. The new contract story could be the players way of getting as much out of his next club as possible. There's a long way to go yet, but I was also told we've got two permanents and a loan lined up. Defender, striker and a"special"winger?
To be continued
Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:26 pm
CityGent wrote:A representative of Cardiff City is meeting Mackie tonight in London just for preliminary talks. Jamie Mackie has already told him that he recently tried to secure an improved contract at Loftus Road. His words to CCFC are that he's on 18k a week and wanted 30k in a new deal, but obvioulsly the situation has all changed at QPR. The new contract story could be the players way of getting as much out of his next club as possible. There's a long way to go yet, but I was also told we've got two permanents and a loan lined up. Defender, striker and a"special"winger?
To be continued
Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:38 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:14 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:14 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:11 pm
buckleys brewery wrote:He played again today. That's 3 starts under their new manager. Ca'nt see him leaving Rangers.
Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:19 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:He played again today. That's 3 starts under their new manager. Ca'nt see him leaving Rangers.
He will not be leaving them fact i really dont know why or where people soak this shit up then put it on a forums and it never ends
Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:22 pm
Merlin wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:He played again today. That's 3 starts under their new manager. Ca'nt see him leaving Rangers.
He will not be leaving them fact i really dont know why or where people soak this shit up then put it on a forums and it never ends
Regardless of what you say or think (Mr.Negative!) there is a CCFC rep travelling to discuss a possible deal of some sort tomorrow.....
We'll leave it at that and see who's right then?
Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:24 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:Merlin wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:He played again today. That's 3 starts under their new manager. Ca'nt see him leaving Rangers.
He will not be leaving them fact i really dont know why or where people soak this shit up then put it on a forums and it never ends
Regardless of what you say or think (Mr.Negative!) there is a CCFC rep travelling to discuss a possible deal of some sort tomorrow.....
We'll leave it at that and see who's right then?
Ok merlin lets hope your magic pays off hes played all games since hughes become there manager and they rejected a 2million quid offer from fulham last week which i doubt we even have the fee lets alone his wages,but yea we will see.
Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:32 pm
Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:46 pm