Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:31 am
Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:50 am
Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:53 am
carlccfc wrote:13 Crystal Palace 26 4 7 2 12 9 6 0 7 13 16 0 37
14 Barnsley 26 6 2 5 22 19 4 4 5 15 20 -2 36
15 Leicester 26 6 3 5 20 15 3 5 4 14 15 4 35
16 Peterborough 26 6 2 4 27 20 3 4 7 17 22 2 33
17 Portsmouth 25 7 3 3 19 10 1 4 7 8 16 1 31
18 Watford 26 5 4 5 19 20 2 5 5 9 16 -8 30
19 Ipswich 26 5 1 7 20 22 3 3 7 17 29 -14 28
20 Bristol City 26 3 3 6 10 14 4 3 7 13 22 -13 27
21 Millwall 26 5 5 4 17 16 13 8 7 18 -10 26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22 Nott'm Forest 26 3 2 9 11 24 4 1 7 10 18 -21 24
23 Doncaster 26 4 5 4 10 12 2 0 11 12 31 -21 23
24 Coventry 26 4 4 5 14 14 0 3 10 6 21 -15 19
I was looking at the table last night and felt a little disappointed at the points we have dropped against teams in the lower half of the table.
Coventry, Doncaster, Millwall, Ipswich, Watford, Portsmouth, Peterborough, and Leicester.
A total of 17 points dropped against teams currently in the bottom half of the table leaves me thinking 'what could the table have looked like'.
We have taken 25 points from the teams in the lower half of the table.
Hopefully we can turn the away draws against Portsmouth, Watford, Millwall and Coventry and beat them all at home.
IpswIch and Leicester away next month and at present neither team is having a good time so who knows we may look back at this post and think it is not as bad as it seemed weeks ago.
This will probably be deemed a negative post but which ever way it is read it is fact.
I will counteract this post with a look at the points gained/dropped against teams in the top half later today.
Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:54 am
polo wrote:to be fair though this is a division where all teams are capable if beating each other.
it always has been and even more so this year jydging by the fact ni one is running away with it
Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:57 am
castleblue wrote:carlccfc wrote:13 Crystal Palace 26 4 7 2 12 9 6 0 7 13 16 0 37
14 Barnsley 26 6 2 5 22 19 4 4 5 15 20 -2 36
15 Leicester 26 6 3 5 20 15 3 5 4 14 15 4 35
16 Peterborough 26 6 2 4 27 20 3 4 7 17 22 2 33
17 Portsmouth 25 7 3 3 19 10 1 4 7 8 16 1 31
18 Watford 26 5 4 5 19 20 2 5 5 9 16 -8 30
19 Ipswich 26 5 1 7 20 22 3 3 7 17 29 -14 28
20 Bristol City 26 3 3 6 10 14 4 3 7 13 22 -13 27
21 Millwall 26 5 5 4 17 16 13 8 7 18 -10 26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22 Nott'm Forest 26 3 2 9 11 24 4 1 7 10 18 -21 24
23 Doncaster 26 4 5 4 10 12 2 0 11 12 31 -21 23
24 Coventry 26 4 4 5 14 14 0 3 10 6 21 -15 19
I was looking at the table last night and felt a little disappointed at the points we have dropped against teams in the lower half of the table.
Coventry, Doncaster, Millwall, Ipswich, Watford, Portsmouth, Peterborough, and Leicester.
A total of 17 points dropped against teams currently in the bottom half of the table leaves me thinking 'what could the table have looked like'.
We have taken 25 points from the teams in the lower half of the table.
Hopefully we can turn the away draws against Portsmouth, Watford, Millwall and Coventry and beat them all at home.
IpswIch and Leicester away next month and at present neither team is having a good time so who knows we may look back at this post and think it is not as bad as it seemed weeks ago.
This will probably be deemed a negative post but which ever way it is read it is fact.
I will counteract this post with a look at the points gained/dropped against teams in the top half later today.
Carl we have dropped more points than any other club from a winning position 16 in total and as you have quite rightly pointed out holding onto the lead in any 2 of those away draws would see us joint top of the table.
However we have scored the first goal in 18 of our league matches so maybe it is not surprising that we have dropped more points from a winning position than any other club because we have been in a wining position more often than any other club. Also our opponents have only scored the first goal in 5 of our league matches which is also better than any other team in the league. The remaining 3 games being 0-0 draws which is also the lowest number of games where a club has failed to score in the League.
In short that means we are a very difficult team to beat and why I still believe we will make the playoffs at least. I totally agree with you that if we can turn draws to wins then the table would look so very different.
But we all know what we need a winger or two with real pace and another CF and we will be on our way.
Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:01 am
carlccfc wrote:polo wrote:to be fair though this is a division where all teams are capable if beating each other.
it always has been and even more so this year jydging by the fact ni one is running away with it
Polo that is said every season but if we think we can gain automatic promotion then we have to beating the teams on poor runs.
I could say the table don't lie and you're where you are because you deserve to be, so a team in 3rd should be beating a team in 23rd, unless of course factors such as injuries and suspensions hinder team selection but that was not the case yesterday.
Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:10 am
polo wrote:carlccfc wrote:polo wrote:to be fair though this is a division where all teams are capable if beating each other.
it always has been and even more so this year jydging by the fact ni one is running away with it
Polo that is said every season but if we think we can gain automatic promotion then we have to beating the teams on poor runs.
I could say the table don't lie and you're where you are because you deserve to be, so a team in 3rd should be beating a team in 23rd, unless of course factors such as injuries and suspensions hinder team selection but that was not the case yesterday.
I agree if we want autos we got to go to somewhere like donny and take 3 points and im dissapointed we didnt.
however i think 3rd place and 4 points off top at halfway stage is good going.
i think we would snap malkys hand off if he offered play offs at the start of the season so im not to downbeat.
Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:37 am
carlccfc wrote:castleblue wrote:carlccfc wrote:13 Crystal Palace 26 4 7 2 12 9 6 0 7 13 16 0 37
14 Barnsley 26 6 2 5 22 19 4 4 5 15 20 -2 36
15 Leicester 26 6 3 5 20 15 3 5 4 14 15 4 35
16 Peterborough 26 6 2 4 27 20 3 4 7 17 22 2 33
17 Portsmouth 25 7 3 3 19 10 1 4 7 8 16 1 31
18 Watford 26 5 4 5 19 20 2 5 5 9 16 -8 30
19 Ipswich 26 5 1 7 20 22 3 3 7 17 29 -14 28
20 Bristol City 26 3 3 6 10 14 4 3 7 13 22 -13 27
21 Millwall 26 5 5 4 17 16 13 8 7 18 -10 26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22 Nott'm Forest 26 3 2 9 11 24 4 1 7 10 18 -21 24
23 Doncaster 26 4 5 4 10 12 2 0 11 12 31 -21 23
24 Coventry 26 4 4 5 14 14 0 3 10 6 21 -15 19
I was looking at the table last night and felt a little disappointed at the points we have dropped against teams in the lower half of the table.
Coventry, Doncaster, Millwall, Ipswich, Watford, Portsmouth, Peterborough, and Leicester.
A total of 17 points dropped against teams currently in the bottom half of the table leaves me thinking 'what could the table have looked like'.
We have taken 25 points from the teams in the lower half of the table.
Hopefully we can turn the away draws against Portsmouth, Watford, Millwall and Coventry and beat them all at home.
IpswIch and Leicester away next month and at present neither team is having a good time so who knows we may look back at this post and think it is not as bad as it seemed weeks ago.
This will probably be deemed a negative post but which ever way it is read it is fact.
I will counteract this post with a look at the points gained/dropped against teams in the top half later today.
Carl we have dropped more points than any other club from a winning position 16 in total and as you have quite rightly pointed out holding onto the lead in any 2 of those away draws would see us joint top of the table.
However we have scored the first goal in 18 of our league matches so maybe it is not surprising that we have dropped more points from a winning position than any other club because we have been in a wining position more often than any other club. Also our opponents have only scored the first goal in 5 of our league matches which is also better than any other team in the league. The remaining 3 games being 0-0 draws which is also the lowest number of games where a club has failed to score in the League.
In short that means we are a very difficult team to beat and why I still believe we will make the playoffs at least. I totally agree with you that if we can turn draws to wins then the table would look so very different.
But we all know what we need a winger or two with real pace and another CF and we will be on our way.
Gary the only surprise in this thread for me is you were not the first to reply, I love your stats on all things City
Hard to beat is something we have agreed on, both on the board and the phone, but I find it frustrating when we don't hold a lead, especially when we are becoming a team difficult to break down.
Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:06 pm
carlccfc wrote:13 Crystal Palace 26 4 7 2 12 9 6 0 7 13 16 0 37
14 Barnsley 26 6 2 5 22 19 4 4 5 15 20 -2 36
15 Leicester 26 6 3 5 20 15 3 5 4 14 15 4 35
16 Peterborough 26 6 2 4 27 20 3 4 7 17 22 2 33
17 Portsmouth 25 7 3 3 19 10 1 4 7 8 16 1 31
18 Watford 26 5 4 5 19 20 2 5 5 9 16 -8 30
19 Ipswich 26 5 1 7 20 22 3 3 7 17 29 -14 28
20 Bristol City 26 3 3 6 10 14 4 3 7 13 22 -13 27
21 Millwall 26 5 5 4 17 16 13 8 7 18 -10 26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22 Nott'm Forest 26 3 2 9 11 24 4 1 7 10 18 -21 24
23 Doncaster 26 4 5 4 10 12 2 0 11 12 31 -21 23
24 Coventry 26 4 4 5 14 14 0 3 10 6 21 -15 19
I was looking at the table last night and felt a little disappointed at the points we have dropped against teams in the lower half of the table.
Coventry, Doncaster, Millwall, Ipswich, Watford, Portsmouth, Peterborough, and Leicester.
A total of 17 points dropped against teams currently in the bottom half of the table leaves me thinking 'what could the table have looked like'.
We have taken 25 points from the teams in the lower half of the table.
Hopefully we can turn the away draws against Portsmouth, Watford, Millwall and Coventry and beat them all at home.
IpswIch and Leicester away next month and at present neither team is having a good time so who knows we may look back at this post and think it is not as bad as it seemed weeks ago.
This will probably be deemed a negative post but which ever way it is read it is fact.
I will counteract this post with a look at the points gained/dropped against teams in the top half later today.
Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:55 am
Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:38 pm
Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:44 pm
Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:49 pm
Nedd Glas wrote:I can't get my head around the fact that the lower teams have lost a lot of games but not to us - why not?
Time someone got hold of footage of the defeats of those teams and analysed why and how they lost. It's not rocket science, so there must be someone in the CCFC set up who can figure it out.
Most importantly, IF WE NEED MORE PLAYERS, PLEASE, LET'S SIGN THEM SOON!
Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:56 pm
jezzy666 wrote:Nedd Glas wrote:I can't get my head around the fact that the lower teams have lost a lot of games but not to us - why not?
Time someone got hold of footage of the defeats of those teams and analysed why and how they lost. It's not rocket science, so there must be someone in the CCFC set up who can figure it out.
Most importantly, IF WE NEED MORE PLAYERS, PLEASE, LET'S SIGN THEM SOON!
its quite obvious, lower teams stay defensive and get everbody behind the ball knowing were the better team, rarely do they open up themselves which would allow us to open them up in return.
as they stay back its much harder for us the break them down and create chances, with us lacking in a couple of wingers and a striker, if teams put 11 players behind the ball we lack the cutting edge to break down teams
Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:09 pm
Nedd Glas wrote:jezzy666 wrote:Nedd Glas wrote:I can't get my head around the fact that the lower teams have lost a lot of games but not to us - why not?
Time someone got hold of footage of the defeats of those teams and analysed why and how they lost. It's not rocket science, so there must be someone in the CCFC set up who can figure it out.
Most importantly, IF WE NEED MORE PLAYERS, PLEASE, LET'S SIGN THEM SOON!
its quite obvious, lower teams stay defensive and get everbody behind the ball knowing were the better team, rarely do they open up themselves which would allow us to open them up in return.
as they stay back its much harder for us the break them down and create chances, with us lacking in a couple of wingers and a striker, if teams put 11 players behind the ball we lack the cutting edge to break down teams
That begs the question: do they do that in all their games, though?
They clearly don't, which is why they've lost so many (other than to us).
Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:50 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Surely getting results against the top sides is better as those games become the proverbial '6 pointers'
Although I agree we should be doing better against lower placed teams, the situation we have now is better than the reverse i.e. beating lower end teams instead of those at the top.