Seems to have slipped under the radar but we spent £600k on
Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:01 pm
agents last season.
Disgrace.
Disgrace.
Re: Seems to have slipped under the radar but we spent £600k on
Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:05 pm
Link to table here
http://www.scribd.com/doc/63185179/Foot ... -Fees-2011
QPR £1,7m
including a few dodgy ones no doubt 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/63185179/Foot ... -Fees-2011
QPR £1,7m
including a few dodgy ones no doubt
Re: Seems to have slipped under the radar but we spent £600k on
Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:46 pm
Considering some of the expensive loans we had it does not seem too surprising.
Interesting the number of loans some clubs had Leicester City 23, Crystal Palace 21 so our 12 doesn't seem so bad. I presume a lot of the loans were extentions of existing loans, but they still involved the agent doing some work.
Interesting the number of loans some clubs had Leicester City 23, Crystal Palace 21 so our 12 doesn't seem so bad. I presume a lot of the loans were extentions of existing loans, but they still involved the agent doing some work.
Re: Seems to have slipped under the radar but we spent £600k on
Sat Aug 27, 2011 11:20 pm
we probably spent that on fannying around with jay
Re: Seems to have slipped under the radar but we spent £600k on
Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:50 am
englishbluebird wrote:we probably spent that on fannying around with jay
Uh
The "names" we had on loan I'm not surprised.