6 points out of the first 9...

for anyone who would have taken that??

bearing in mind that weve still had a better start than 16 other teams

bearing in mind that we had West Ham away in the opening game, a new manager and an incomplete squad

bearing in mind that if we carry on getting points at this rate of 2 in 3, we'll finish with 92 points and probably promotion

id say its a bloody good start, bearing all that in mind

:ayatollah: for anyone who would have taken that??

bearing in mind that weve still had a better start than 16 other teams

bearing in mind that we had West Ham away in the opening game, a new manager and an incomplete squad

bearing in mind that if we carry on getting points at this rate of 2 in 3, we'll finish with 92 points and probably promotion

id say its a bloody good start, bearing all that in mind

Good post scott If we are being honest i would have said 5 or 6 pts - before a ball was kicked.
So Yes with your above points,i agree 6 pts is good

Yes, it is a very good start, as I stated in my thread. People are being irrational.

:ayatollah: for anyone who would have taken that??

bearing in mind that weve still had a better start than 16 other teams

bearing in mind that we had West Ham away in the opening game, a new manager and an incomplete squad

bearing in mind that if we carry on getting points at this rate of 2 in 3, we'll finish with 92 points and probably promotion

id say its a bloody good start, bearing all that in mind

Good post scott If we are being honest i would have said 5 or 6 pts - before a ball was kicked.
So Yes with your above points,i agree 6 pts is good

thanks

Like I say year after year you only have to average 2 points a game to get promoted.
and you cant see the real runners and riders till christmas.