Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:36 am
Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:42 am
Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:46 am
ccfcgrangeend wrote:Yes i believe this is going to happen as we was talking about this on the way home, someone was saying that they will get exactly the same treatment we recieved.
Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:50 am
ccfcgrangeend wrote:Yes i believe this is going to happen as we was talking about this on the way home, someone was saying that they will get exactly the same treatment we recieved.
Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:14 am
Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:22 am
Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:30 am
Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:38 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Dont agree with this.
This was not any doing of WHU fans was it? It was all down to the match commander who is a copper. He most likely wanted an easy day for his men and basically used the Chelsea fiasco as an excuse.
Lets not take it out on the WHU fans but point our frustration towards the authorites who still want the overtime but an easy life with it.
Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:42 am
Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:45 am
Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:45 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Dont agree with this.
This was not any doing of WHU fans was it? It was all down to the match commander who is a copper. He most likely wanted an easy day for his men and basically used the Chelsea fiasco as an excuse.
Lets not take it out on the WHU fans but point our frustration towards the authorites who still want the overtime but an easy life with it.
Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:51 am
Leighton James Dont Like uS wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Dont agree with this.
This was not any doing of WHU fans was it? It was all down to the match commander who is a copper. He most likely wanted an easy day for his men and basically used the Chelsea fiasco as an excuse.
Lets not take it out on the WHU fans but point our frustration towards the authorites who still want the overtime but an easy life with it.
I see Your point, Also the lost revenue CCFC would loose if we sold only 1250 instead of 3-4000 would be considerable, However We can not allow the treatment Our Fans had at Westhamorient, It was despicable and WH didnt seem to care, That in my book leaves Us collectively Club/Fans/ etc etc No alternative but to return the same hospitality with only 1100 Tickets for WH!!!
Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:13 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Dont agree with this.
This was not any doing of WHU fans was it? It was all down to the match commander who is a copper. He most likely wanted an easy day for his men and basically used the Chelsea fiasco as an excuse.
Lets not take it out on the WHU fans but point our frustration towards the authorites who still want the overtime but an easy life with it.
Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:50 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Dont agree with this.
This was not any doing of WHU fans was it? It was all down to the match commander who is a copper. He most likely wanted an easy day for his men and basically used the Chelsea fiasco as an excuse.
Lets not take it out on the WHU fans but point our frustration towards the authorites who still want the overtime but an easy life with it.
Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:01 pm
Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Dont agree with this.
This was not any doing of WHU fans was it? It was all down to the match commander who is a copper. He most likely wanted an easy day for his men and basically used the Chelsea fiasco as an excuse.
Lets not take it out on the WHU fans but point our frustration towards the authorites who still want the overtime but an easy life with it.
No way treat them the same as we were treated, it's the only way.
The other point of this is we had less away support which was a disadvantage for our team, the same must happen to wet spam to even things up.
Other clubs need to learn to treat us properly or their fans get the same............
Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:12 pm
nerd wrote:Leighton James Dont Like uS wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Dont agree with this.
This was not any doing of WHU fans was it? It was all down to the match commander who is a copper. He most likely wanted an easy day for his men and basically used the Chelsea fiasco as an excuse.
Lets not take it out on the WHU fans but point our frustration towards the authorites who still want the overtime but an easy life with it.
I see Your point, Also the lost revenue CCFC would loose if we sold only 1250 instead of 3-4000 would be considerable, However We can not allow the treatment Our Fans had at Westhamorient, It was despicable and WH didnt seem to care, That in my book leaves Us collectively Club/Fans/ etc etc No alternative but to return the same hospitality with only 1100 Tickets for WH!!!
The option was for CCFC fans NOT to go to West Ham. To NOT condone the restrictions by going.
Big picture, folks.
People chose to go knowing the situation.
An empty away end would have been far, far more effective, because the issue would have been noted. West Ham would also have had a vested interest in dealing with it long term due to loss of income.
An empty away end would have been a far more telling picture than a few banners which very, very few outside of the CCFC fanbase understood the meaning behind.
Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:23 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Dont agree with this.
This was not any doing of WHU fans was it? It was all down to the match commander who is a copper. He most likely wanted an easy day for his men and basically used the Chelsea fiasco as an excuse.
Lets not take it out on the WHU fans but point our frustration towards the authorites who still want the overtime but an easy life with it.
Ian i always take seriously what you say, and i am in agreement with you it isn't WHU fans fault. But the only way we can say we want to be treated fair is by other fans being inconvenienced as well as our supporters.
Is it fair we could of had 3 or 4 thousand fans cheering on our team which could of made a massive difference.
If we impose the same restrictions on WHU then it will send out a massive message that we will do to others what they do to us. It isn't fair but we have to do what is right for our supporters other wise we will be walked over time and time again.
And for sure only 1000 of there fans will make less noise than 2200 and that puts them at the same disadvantage as we were put in yesterday. That is my opinion and i feel very passionate about it as well, and will be extremely angry if our Club does not back it.
Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:26 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Dont agree with this.
This was not any doing of WHU fans was it? It was all down to the match commander who is a copper. He most likely wanted an easy day for his men and basically used the Chelsea fiasco as an excuse.
Lets not take it out on the WHU fans but point our frustration towards the authorites who still want the overtime but an easy life with it.
Ian i always take seriously what you say, and i am in agreement with you it isn't WHU fans fault. But the only way we can say we want to be treated fair is by other fans being inconvenienced as well as our supporters.
Is it fair we could of had 3 or 4 thousand fans cheering on our team which could of made a massive difference.
If we impose the same restrictions on WHU then it will send out a massive message that we will do to others what they do to us. It isn't fair but we have to do what is right for our supporters other wise we will be walked over time and time again.
And for sure only 1000 of there fans will make less noise than 2200 and that puts them at the same disadvantage as we were put in yesterday. That is my opinion and i feel very passionate about it as well, and will be extremely angry if our Club does not back it.
Tbh I would rather be a welcoming club to prove other clubs that their perceptions about us are wrong.
Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:28 pm
Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:31 pm