Sat Jun 25, 2011 6:21 am
Sat Jun 25, 2011 7:40 am
Sat Jun 25, 2011 7:41 am
ROB CCFC wrote:he's not going to be foud guilty
Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:42 am
Midfield general wrote:Would there be a clause in the transfer agreement..?
Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:29 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:37 pm
Midfield general wrote:Bloobirds101 wrote:he will be found not guilty.
and how do you know..?
Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:52 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:57 pm
Bloobirds101 wrote:he will be found not guilty.
Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:58 pm
taffyapple wrote:Midfield general wrote:Bloobirds101 wrote:he will be found not guilty.
and how do you know..?
Its a fair point you raise.
I posted elsewhere, a Scottish Copper has told me the case is a joke and the
Procurater feller will not go ahead with it. Being charged is a million miles
from getting to court mate. Apparently it was a set-up, the girl is a known
munter, all about trying to get money and damages for f**k all. Id imagine
the Club know more about it than all of us by now, the fact that they are
still going ahead speaks volumes,
Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:06 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:32 pm
nerd wrote:Bloobirds101 wrote:he will be found not guilty.
And your evidence for that claim is?
Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:44 pm
Midfield general wrote:x
Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:47 pm
Bloobirds101 wrote:1) I've been told by dozens of people up in Scotland that the case is an absolute joke. It has also been spread round that a copper has said the case is a shambles and the CPU are still trying to gather more evidence and witnesses to put a case together. At the moment, its his word vs his. in 99% of 1 on 1 cases in reference to a rape case the person charged gets found not guilty.
2) He will have a very strong lawyer who will claim the woman was drunk and unable to give an accurate description of events. That throws the whole case into jeopardy and he'll walk free because of it. Conviction of rape is extremely hard.
3) If they had any solid evidence like traces of semen taken from swabs he'd have been thrown before a judge instantly and sentenced because there would be damning evidence. They've drawn it out because they're still trying to put a case together against him. He was charged in January and only just now is the case going to court. If they had solid evidence, they wouldn't have taken this long.
4) There was another player involved who will also back up his story and say she was drunk after the night out.
5) Its rife around the internet that the charges are dropped. This is due to an information leak. This would back up the CPU's weak case against him and in my opinion given the SPF's rumoured attachment with certain Scottish clubs *Rangers* it wouldn't surprise me if this was all dragged out so that they could use it against Dundee to get him on the cheap. Rangers have had a £750,000 bid rejected for him.
So yeah, I am 100% certain given all that that the case will be thrown out. It still wont stop the chants though of whichever club he goes too.
Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:04 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:05 pm
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:doooooooooom and gloooooooooooom
Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:31 am
Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:26 am
Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:31 am
Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:50 am
Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:51 am