Wed May 25, 2011 5:41 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 5:51 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 5:57 pm
Nathan Walker wrote:As some of you will be aware I am pretty against Sam returning but as you know, to form a solid opinion you need to know reasons for and against something. So 2 questions that the people who want the return could answer...
Number1:Bakers question, Now you have banned him for taking the piss, which is fair enough but he is asking a reasonable question that should be answered. What will Hammam bring that The Malaysians cannot?
Number2: Being that Sam has been out of football for what 5-6 years? The big plus point to many for Sam is his 'football knowledge'. Is this outdated?. 5-6 years is a long time in football.
This is not a snipe, these are genuine questions to get an opinion on this saga.
Thanks
Wed May 25, 2011 5:57 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 6:02 pm
01443casual wrote:Whatever you feel about Hammam he is full of passion and full of passion for this club. Whatever his accounting misdemeanors I genuinely feel he had the best interest of the club and more importantly the fans at heart.
The fact is simple, keep him away from the books and the money and let him assist in rallying the players and the fans which I'm sure you would agree is something none of the current regime do
Just an opinion
Wed May 25, 2011 6:06 pm
BigGwynram wrote:He as watched more football over the last few years than you or I.
As for what will he bring, how old are you and Baker, can you look back past the year 2000,the man has never been in charge of a club that got relegated, he has taken a team from the fourth division u up into the prem for ten years with a home based crowd of around 6,000 and kept them in the top half for the majority of thata time, he had 2 promotions in 4 seasons with us and we won a play off final, and you ask what does he bring.
Wed May 25, 2011 6:11 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 6:12 pm
Nathan Walker wrote:BigGwynram wrote:He as watched more football over the last few years than you or I.
As for what will he bring, how old are you and Baker, can you look back past the year 2000,the man has never been in charge of a club that got relegated, he has taken a team from the fourth division u up into the prem for ten years with a home based crowd of around 6,000 and kept them in the top half for the majority of thata time, he had 2 promotions in 4 seasons with us and we won a play off final, and you ask what does he bring.
Why do you feel the need to patronise and belittle people when giving an answer? If you had a bit of class like Tyler below you would just put an answer straight and not patronise people about age etc.
Wed May 25, 2011 6:14 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Nathan Walker wrote:BigGwynram wrote:He as watched more football over the last few years than you or I.
As for what will he bring, how old are you and Baker, can you look back past the year 2000,the man has never been in charge of a club that got relegated, he has taken a team from the fourth division u up into the prem for ten years with a home based crowd of around 6,000 and kept them in the top half for the majority of thata time, he had 2 promotions in 4 seasons with us and we won a play off final, and you ask what does he bring.
Why do you feel the need to patronise and belittle people when giving an answer? If you had a bit of class like Tyler below you would just put an answer straight and not patronise people about age etc.
Belittle and patronise, and what part of Merthyr do you live in, i would not go to far from your creche if i was you, there are plenty of rude suprises waiting, f**k me patronising, you'd have been butted up the road before you'd finished your question. It's a bad world out there, toughen up, or stay in.
Wed May 25, 2011 6:15 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 6:16 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 6:18 pm
Maesteg bluebirds wrote:Gwyn I agree with what you are saying, but there is a but? I remember you begging with Sam when he was tearing our club apart, selling players. And what about running up the huge debt that we are now left with.
He called us his family, and yet he borrowed money from his own company at an higher rate than what you could have had it from an high street bank. I think, if he can't get what he wants, he would pull this club down with him, as he did with Wimbledon, and yet he can be charismatic to get what he wants, and then he has another side to him where he is spitefull and vindictive and would go to any lengths to get what he wants.
These are my opinions and observations, I would like to know yours, as you were very close to him?
Wed May 25, 2011 6:20 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 6:23 pm
Maesteg bluebirds wrote:Gwyn I agree with what you are saying, but there is a but? I remember you begging with Sam when he was tearing our club apart, selling players. And what about running up the huge debt that we are now left with.
He called us his family, and yet he borrowed money from his own company at an higher rate than what you could have had it from an high street bank. I think, if he can't get what he wants, he would pull this club down with him, as he did with Wimbledon, and yet he can be charismatic to get what he wants, and then he has another side to him where he is spitefull and vindictive and would go to any lengths to get what he wants.
These are my opinions and observations, I would like to know yours, as you were very close to him?
Wed May 25, 2011 6:25 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Maesteg bluebirds wrote:Gwyn I agree with what you are saying, but there is a but? I remember you begging with Sam when he was tearing our club apart, selling players. And what about running up the huge debt that we are now left with.
He called us his family, and yet he borrowed money from his own company at an higher rate than what you could have had it from an high street bank. I think, if he can't get what he wants, he would pull this club down with him, as he did with Wimbledon, and yet he can be charismatic to get what he wants, and then he has another side to him where he is spitefull and vindictive and would go to any lengths to get what he wants.
These are my opinions and observations, I would like to know yours, as you were very close to him?
He didn't though, where did you get that from, when Sam took over the debt off Citi bank and covered it with the Langstons money, it was done as an unsecured loan with a very low repayment schedule, just above base rate, now if you look at the loans we have had from other directors you will find all sorts of tie ins and security with soem rates over 20%. Perhaps that's where your going wrong.
Wed May 25, 2011 6:28 pm
Eddie May wrote:Gwyn don not waste your time on a little boy called baker, he does not deserve to have a question even considered.
Wed May 25, 2011 6:30 pm
Nathan Walker wrote:As some of you will be aware I am pretty against Sam returning but as you know, to form a solid opinion you need to know reasons for and against something. So 2 questions that the people who want the return could answer...
Number1:Bakers question, Now you have banned him for taking the piss, which is fair enough but he is asking a reasonable question that should be answered. What will Hammam bring that The Malaysians cannot?
Number2: Being that Sam has been out of football for what 5-6 years? The big plus point to many for Sam is his 'football knowledge'. Is this outdated?. 5-6 years is a long time in football.
This is not a snipe, these are genuine questions to get an opinion on this saga.
Thanks
Wed May 25, 2011 6:30 pm
Eddie May wrote:Gwyn don not waste your time on a little boy called baker, he does not deserve to have a question even considered.
Wed May 25, 2011 6:32 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 6:35 pm
gileos boot boy wrote:Nathan Walker wrote:As some of you will be aware I am pretty against Sam returning but as you know, to form a solid opinion you need to know reasons for and against something. So 2 questions that the people who want the return could answer...
Number1:Bakers question, Now you have banned him for taking the piss, which is fair enough but he is asking a reasonable question that should be answered. What will Hammam bring that The Malaysians cannot?
Number2: Being that Sam has been out of football for what 5-6 years? The big plus point to many for Sam is his 'football knowledge'. Is this outdated?. 5-6 years is a long time in football.
This is not a snipe, these are genuine questions to get an opinion on this saga.
Thanks
I don't know what he said, but I'm not in favour of censorship, unless its absolutely necessary.
Sam's been out of football for "5-6 years". The Malaysians have NEVER been IN football!
With all his faults, I'd have him back. Eastern Passion In, Eastern Promise Out!
Wed May 25, 2011 6:36 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 6:39 pm
hirwaunbluebird wrote:this board is getting bitchy.
Wed May 25, 2011 6:41 pm
Wed May 25, 2011 6:44 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Eddie May wrote:Gwyn don not waste your time on a little boy called baker, he does not deserve to have a question even considered.
Just passing on some experience from living in the real word, where occasionally the keyboard doesn't protect you.
Wed May 25, 2011 6:58 pm
jinks-rct wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Eddie May wrote:Gwyn don not waste your time on a little boy called baker, he does not deserve to have a question even considered.
Just passing on some experience from living in the real word, where occasionally the keyboard doesn't protect you.
whose baker?
Wed May 25, 2011 7:29 pm
Nathan Walker wrote:As some of you will be aware I am pretty against Sam returning but as you know, to form a solid opinion you need to know reasons for and against something. So 2 questions that the people who want the return could answer...
Number1:Bakers question, Now you have banned him for taking the piss, which is fair enough but he is asking a reasonable question that should be answered. What will Hammam bring that The Malaysians cannot?
Number2: Being that Sam has been out of football for what 5-6 years? The big plus point to many for Sam is his 'football knowledge'. Is this outdated?. 5-6 years is a long time in football.
This is not a snipe, these are genuine questions to get an opinion on this saga.
Thanks
Wed May 25, 2011 7:35 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Nathan Walker wrote:As some of you will be aware I am pretty against Sam returning but as you know, to form a solid opinion you need to know reasons for and against something. So 2 questions that the people who want the return could answer...
Number1:Bakers question, Now you have banned him for taking the piss, which is fair enough but he is asking a reasonable question that should be answered. What will Hammam bring that The Malaysians cannot?
Number2: Being that Sam has been out of football for what 5-6 years? The big plus point to many for Sam is his 'football knowledge'. Is this outdated?. 5-6 years is a long time in football.
This is not a snipe, these are genuine questions to get an opinion on this saga.
Thanks
Nathan you answered question 1 with question 2. And that is Football knoledge of which the Malaysians have none. So with them (the Malaysians) and Sam both on board i think wde might just get a winner
Wed May 25, 2011 7:44 pm
Nathan Walker wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Nathan Walker wrote:As some of you will be aware I am pretty against Sam returning but as you know, to form a solid opinion you need to know reasons for and against something. So 2 questions that the people who want the return could answer...
Number1:Bakers question, Now you have banned him for taking the piss, which is fair enough but he is asking a reasonable question that should be answered. What will Hammam bring that The Malaysians cannot?
Number2: Being that Sam has been out of football for what 5-6 years? The big plus point to many for Sam is his 'football knowledge'. Is this outdated?. 5-6 years is a long time in football.
This is not a snipe, these are genuine questions to get an opinion on this saga.
Thanks
Nathan you answered question 1 with question 2. And that is Football knoledge of which the Malaysians have none. So with them (the Malaysians) and Sam both on board i think wde might just get a winner
To a certain extent Nukes, I suppose I did but I went further on in point two to say that has Sams football contacts been outdated leaving him with nothing over the Malaysians
Wed May 25, 2011 7:47 pm
Thu May 26, 2011 12:59 pm
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:gileos boot boy wrote:Nathan Walker wrote:As some of you will be aware I am pretty against Sam returning but as you know, to form a solid opinion you need to know reasons for and against something. So 2 questions that the people who want the return could answer...
Number1:Bakers question, Now you have banned him for taking the piss, which is fair enough but he is asking a reasonable question that should be answered. What will Hammam bring that The Malaysians cannot?
Number2: Being that Sam has been out of football for what 5-6 years? The big plus point to many for Sam is his 'football knowledge'. Is this outdated?. 5-6 years is a long time in football.
This is not a snipe, these are genuine questions to get an opinion on this saga.
Thanks
I don't know what he said, but I'm not in favour of censorship, unless its absolutely necessary.
Sam's been out of football for "5-6 years". The Malaysians have NEVER been IN football!
With all his faults, I'd have him back. Eastern Passion In, Eastern Promise Out!
maybe that's an advantage? everyone knows things get messy when chairmen/board members interfere with footballing matters. they should be there to keep finances ticking over, make sure we stick to budget(!!!) and so on. leave the footballing matters to the football staff (managers, coaches, players..)