Winning Saturd worth at leasd 26 million or even 90million

Win on Saturday and we are third --

If QPR get deducted 10 points then its Promotion--Party time --Bingo 90 million

If QPR dont get deducted any points or only 5 then we have the right to appeal if we win at Burnley.

Sheff Utd won 26 million (Staged over 6 seasons) --we should get the same at least.-

Losing is not an option --neither is a draw

kerching


Big Game
Cmon City

Win on Saturday and we are third --

If QPR get deducted 10 points then its Promotion--Party time --Bingo 90 million

If QPR dont get deducted any points or only 5 then we have the right to appeal if we win at Burnley.

Sheff Utd won 26 million (Staged over 6 seasons) --we should get the same at least.-

Losing is not an option --neither is a draw

kerching


Big Game
Cmon City

Queue another bottle job from davie and the boys!!!!!

Win on Saturday and we are third --

If QPR get deducted 10 points then its Promotion--Party time --Bingo 90 million

If QPR dont get deducted any points or only 5 then we have the right to appeal if we win at Burnley.

Sheff Utd won 26 million (Staged over 6 seasons) --we should get the same at least.-

Losing is not an option --neither is a draw

kerching


Big Game
Cmon City

If we finish third and QPR are not deducted points even though they are proven to have breached one, some or all of the charges against them I'm of the opinion that we would have a very strong compensation claim against them if we don't then go on and win the play-offs.

It all comes down to a duty of care that QPR owed to the FA and 23 Championship clubs. That duty of care includes informing the FA/FL (and therefore the other 23 Championship clubs) that they did-not own the economic rights to Faurlin or that they had used an unlicensed agent to grease the wheels of his transfer.

Of course if the FA were aware of this Faurlin would-not be allowed to play for QPR and so they have breached their duty of care by keeping quite to gain an unfair advantage.

Paladini was experienced football administrator (and an ex-agent) so the legal test is, 'would a similar football administrator/agent think it 'reasonable' that the information was not disclosed to the FA?'

If the conclusion is 'no' (which is highly likely if the FA find against them) then the third placed club would be due compensation based on their economic losses.