Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:15 am
Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:19 am
Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:19 am
Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:07 am
Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:13 am
Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:16 am
Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:37 pm
Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:58 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:I think our friends from West Wales must be thankful this rule is not in place.
60% of turnover.....
Given an average attendance of only 15000 and a low of only 12000 - (Equatable to £300k per match at £20 per head) - they would only be able to afford Div 1 and Div 2 players.
By comparison our lowest attendance is still a good 5000 more than their average!
Statistics taken from Swansea City web site - http://www.swanseacity.net/page/DivisionalAttendance/
Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:07 pm
Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:12 pm
milly44 wrote:joke was it. thank f**k for that, had me worried jack
Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:01 pm
Jack wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:I think our friends from West Wales must be thankful this rule is not in place.
60% of turnover.....
Given an average attendance of only 15000 and a low of only 12000 - (Equatable to £300k per match at £20 per head) - they would only be able to afford Div 1 and Div 2 players.
By comparison our lowest attendance is still a good 5000 more than their average!
Statistics taken from Swansea City web site - http://www.swanseacity.net/page/DivisionalAttendance/
And you spent all your time on that rather than take it as the joke it was intended. How pathetic.
Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:43 pm
Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:49 am
Jack wrote:milly44 wrote:joke was it. thank f**k for that, had me worried jack
At last a sense of humour.
Sat Apr 02, 2011 6:42 am
milly44 wrote:Jack wrote:milly44 wrote:joke was it. thank f**k for that, had me worried jack
At last a sense of humour.
i have humour my flower. life is to short to be serious xx