Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:10 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:15 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:20 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:23 pm
castleblue wrote:and only gets a Football Banning order. Why?
http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/news/ ... ticle.html
It's been many years now since I travelled to an away game on a supporters bus but it appears to me that for our cousins this was something of a giant piss up. Knowingly breaking the Law by being drunk is one thing but throwing a glass bottle into a crowd of people is such a dangerous thing to do as the chances of serious injury to an innocent party are huge.
So why has this guy not been charged with a more serious public order offence, like our guys have been at Chelsea, but he has been saved from a more serious charge BECAUSE NOBODY WAS HURT.
The chap who threw the traffic bollard injuring no one and now serving a 16 month jail sentance how must he be feeling tonight, how are his family feeling afterall common sense would tell anyone which act would most likely lead to serious injury.
The difference here is that Bristol Police haven't bothered to find a handful of Wurzel fans to give evidence that they felt at risk of harm, and there lies the truth the Met Police worked the system to set people up to a big fall.
Bristol Police have handled the situation completely differently with the result that a drunken thug, and that's what anyone who throws a glass bottle into a crowd is A THUG, gets away with a banning order.
If any doubted before that our fans at Chelsea were stitched up doubt no longer, it's a f*cking disgrace.
Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:24 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:27 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:castleblue wrote:and only gets a Football Banning order. Why?
http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/news/ ... ticle.html
It's been many years now since I travelled to an away game on a supporters bus but it appears to me that for our cousins this was something of a giant piss up. Knowingly breaking the Law by being drunk is one thing but throwing a glass bottle into a crowd of people is such a dangerous thing to do as the chances of serious injury to an innocent party are huge.
So why has this guy not been charged with a more serious public order offence, like our guys have been at Chelsea, but he has been saved from a more serious charge BECAUSE NOBODY WAS HURT.
The chap who threw the traffic bollard injuring no one and now serving a 16 month jail sentance how must he be feeling tonight, how are his family feeling afterall common sense would tell anyone which act would most likely lead to serious injury.
The difference here is that Bristol Police haven't bothered to find a handful of Wurzel fans to give evidence that they felt at risk of harm, and there lies the truth the Met Police worked the system to set people up to a big fall.
Bristol Police have handled the situation completely differently with the result that a drunken thug, and that's what anyone who throws a glass bottle into a crowd is A THUG, gets away with a banning order.
If any doubted before that our fans at Chelsea were stitched up doubt no longer, it's a f*cking disgrace.
If i was judge he would have got life
Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:30 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:31 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:40 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:45 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:48 pm
colours wrote:i'm not saying it's right but get over it, ffs.
Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:00 pm
Billy Hunt. wrote:colours wrote:i'm not saying it's right but get over it, ffs.
Why should we? A Cardiff fan was jailed for throwing a cone that hit no-one. A Swansea fan throws a glass bottle that hit no-one and gets just a ban?
Not being funny, if I had both of them objects thrown towards me, I'd much much rather the cone.
Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:01 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:28 pm
Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:20 pm
Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:26 am
Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:36 am
Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:39 am
Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:51 am
colours wrote:i'm not saying it's right but get over it, ffs.
Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:53 am
MAESTEG BLUE wrote:boys regardless of what the jack had the real issue is the charges that are made against football fans are not consistant with offences that happen away from the game. if the cone had been thrown during a scrap on a night out the guy would have had section 4 at most thats if the coppers could be arsed
f**k me how many punches were thrown on the footage ,there will be far worse in maesteg tomorrow night
the laws an arse
Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:56 am
PtB wrote:That's a joke. He clearly threw it with the intent of hurting someone.
This country is a f*cking mess.
Sat Feb 26, 2011 1:42 pm
colours wrote:i'm not saying it's right but get over it, ffs.
Sat Feb 26, 2011 3:13 pm
Willy the Wombat wrote:PtB wrote:That's a joke. He clearly threw it with the intent of hurting someone.
This country is a f*cking mess.
Thatchers fault.
If it wasn't for her we'd be called a f*cking joke. we are now. Sad really, still freedom for Clydebank and freedom for Talgarth, free Upper Cwntwch from being near swansea.
Free Willy, but only for ladies who shave...
Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:37 pm