Bluebina wrote:What an ego, trying to stop parliament doing its job, it may not make any difference anyway, because they are making a hash of it anyway, but he is overstepping the mark IMO.
I expect they will find a loophole to have another vote, or maybe Europe will give a bit more on the backstop, to change things enough for one more vote before an extension?
pembroke allan wrote:He is suppose to be impartial but he is a remainer and on 2 separate occasions recently as turned down amendments for leave to be debated in favour of remain amendments even though one had over a hundred mps in favour of debate...! And he actually went against parliament democracy to interfere previously? The man is a joke and should be removed
NIBluebird wrote:We need to renegotiate.
Euro think they have upper hand , we need to start dictating .
He's made a great decision
ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:If you want a no deal Brexit - you will be happy with what Berkow did
If you want an extension to article 50 - you will be happy with what Berkow did
The only people not happy is the PM who wants her deal.
BUT - they can call a halt to parliament and re start it - and bring the deal bag as it is and Berkow cant do anything about it - according to LBC radio.
It seems though his strings are being pulled though by the majority Remainers in Westminster, to postpone it and then let it die.
ffs wrote:Funny how there's allowed to be 2+ votes on her deal however we are only allowed one on Leave or Remain
ffs wrote:Funny how there's allowed to be 2+ votes on her deal however we are only allowed one on Leave or Remain
pembroke allan wrote:ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:If you want a no deal Brexit - you will be happy with what Berkow did
If you want an extension to article 50 - you will be happy with what Berkow did
The only people not happy is the PM who wants her deal.
BUT - they can call a halt to parliament and re start it - and bring the deal bag as it is and Berkow cant do anything about it - according to LBC radio.
It seems though his strings are being pulled though by the majority Remainers in Westminster, to postpone it and then let it die.
He is openly a remainer so doesn't need anything pulled! Hes probably right with what he says but you can bet your bottom dollar he was grinning like Cheshire cat when he announced it.
worcester_ccfc wrote:pembroke allan wrote:ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:If you want a no deal Brexit - you will be happy with what Berkow did
If you want an extension to article 50 - you will be happy with what Berkow did
The only people not happy is the PM who wants her deal.
BUT - they can call a halt to parliament and re start it - and bring the deal bag as it is and Berkow cant do anything about it - according to LBC radio.
It seems though his strings are being pulled though by the majority Remainers in Westminster, to postpone it and then let it die.
He is openly a remainer so doesn't need anything pulled! Hes probably right with what he says but you can bet your bottom dollar he was grinning like Cheshire cat when he announced it.
He followed the rules. Whatever his opinions are were always going to be irrelevant.
I’ve seen the video of him reading out his statement to the house, and his face is neutral - not smiling like a Cheshire Cat.
worcester_ccfc wrote:pembroke allan wrote:ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:If you want a no deal Brexit - you will be happy with what Berkow did
If you want an extension to article 50 - you will be happy with what Berkow did
The only people not happy is the PM who wants her deal.
BUT - they can call a halt to parliament and re start it - and bring the deal bag as it is and Berkow cant do anything about it - according to LBC radio.
It seems though his strings are being pulled though by the majority Remainers in Westminster, to postpone it and then let it die.
He is openly a remainer so doesn't need anything pulled! Hes probably right with what he says but you can bet your bottom dollar he was grinning like Cheshire cat when he announced it.
He followed the rules. Whatever his opinions are were always going to be irrelevant.
I’ve seen the video of him reading out his statement to the house, and his face is neutral - not smiling like a Cheshire Cat.
pembroke allan wrote:ffs wrote:Funny how there's allowed to be 2+ votes on her deal however we are only allowed one on Leave or Remain
So you want anothet vote so that So you can vote remain again? Then if you win thats final referendum because people said no? : what happened to 1st vote it was just a test run? as for parliament voting twice thats what it does all the time just depends on what it is?
ffs wrote:pembroke allan wrote:ffs wrote:Funny how there's allowed to be 2+ votes on her deal however we are only allowed one on Leave or Remain
So you want anothet vote so that So you can vote remain again? Then if you win thats final referendum because people said no? : what happened to 1st vote it was just a test run? as for parliament voting twice thats what it does all the time just depends on what it is?
The elderly and weak, easily led people had the wool pulled over their eyes by the rich elites for the first vote. Now everyone knows what they are voting for it will be a far more genuine result
Bonner wrote:It’s not him stopping it, it’s constitutional law.
Shows how out of touch kostnof the MP’s are,!they were not even aware of the law.
An embarrassment to this whole shambles .
pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:pembroke allan wrote:ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:If you want a no deal Brexit - you will be happy with what Berkow did
If you want an extension to article 50 - you will be happy with what Berkow did
The only people not happy is the PM who wants her deal.
BUT - they can call a halt to parliament and re start it - and bring the deal bag as it is and Berkow cant do anything about it - according to LBC radio.
It seems though his strings are being pulled though by the majority Remainers in Westminster, to postpone it and then let it die.
He is openly a remainer so doesn't need anything pulled! Hes probably right with what he says but you can bet your bottom dollar he was grinning like Cheshire cat when he announced it.
He followed the rules. Whatever his opinions are were always going to be irrelevant.
I’ve seen the video of him reading out his statement to the house, and his face is neutral - not smiling like a Cheshire Cat.
No well picture in paper as him smirking! Also he used a very little used 400yr old rule to stop vote and didn't tell anyone what he was doing... everyman and his dog knows this man wants to stop brexit, like said hes got history of putting obstacles in way of this gvnmt and is openly opposed to brexit and is using his power to this aim
ffs wrote:pembroke allan wrote:ffs wrote:Funny how there's allowed to be 2+ votes on her deal however we are only allowed one on Leave or Remain
So you want anothet vote so that So you can vote remain again? Then if you win thats final referendum because people said no? : what happened to 1st vote it was just a test run? as for parliament voting twice thats what it does all the time just depends on what it is?
The elderly and weak, easily led people had the wool pulled over their eyes by the rich elites for the first vote. Now everyone knows what they are voting for it will be a far more genuine result
pembroke allan wrote:He is suppose to be impartial but he is a remainer and on 2 separate occasions recently as turned down amendments for leave to be debated in favour of remain amendments even though one had over a hundred mps in favour of debate...! And he actually went against parliament democracy to interfere previously? The man is a joke and should be removed
worcester_ccfc wrote:If the house vote on anything and it’s rejected, does the same thing unaltered go back to the house a second or third time? No.
Bercow is right here, and just following what the house has done since 1604.
Nobody wants May’s deal anyway.
Bluebina wrote:pembroke allan wrote:He is suppose to be impartial but he is a remainer and on 2 separate occasions recently as turned down amendments for leave to be debated in favour of remain amendments even though one had over a hundred mps in favour of debate...! And he actually went against parliament democracy to interfere previously? The man is a joke and should be removed
He's a tool and completely biased, trying to manipulate Parliament into a No Brexit, him running the house of Commons is like having Alistair Campbell referee the Burnley - Cardiff game.
I would love it is May said f u then we will crash out on 29th March, but she doesn't have the balls !!!
epping blue wrote:ffs wrote:pembroke allan wrote:ffs wrote:Funny how there's allowed to be 2+ votes on her deal however we are only allowed one on Leave or Remain
So you want anothet vote so that So you can vote remain again? Then if you win thats final referendum because people said no? : what happened to 1st vote it was just a test run? as for parliament voting twice thats what it does all the time just depends on what it is?
The elderly and weak, easily led people had the wool pulled over their eyes by the rich elites for the first vote. Now everyone knows what they are voting for it will be a far more genuine result
I was lied too. 95% of the establishment, political leaders past and present, leaders of financial institutions almost without exception stood up and told me of the financial armageddon that would immediately ensue should we vote to leave. Well despite their promises of doom, we're 3 years on and its pretty where we were.
That despite government as a whole being determined to thwart the democratic vote of the people. Where could we be now if they really had excepted the result, stopped talking down the economy and got on with it.
Lets be honest, they were finger in the air predictions to suit their individual positions and in many cases a serious abuse of their positions of influence.
Users browsing this forum: Bakedalasker, Bebbsyboy, DotBot [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Iceblue, Igovernor, Magpie [Bot], Proximic [Bot] and 200 guests