Stringfellow wrote:He’s done am afraid, I banged the drum about him last year and most agreed. I so hoped I was wrong and we have seen something from him but for whatever reason it’s the zohore before his purple patch. Hindsight is a wonderful thing but we should have cashed in. Forget ability, he doesn’t want it simple as that. Don’t give me the not fit argument, he’s not good enough he’s a parks player and his speed of though is not quick enough either. Sadly don’t think will see much more of him. Shame.
Steve Zodiak wrote:I think I have been his biggest critic almost from day one. Could never see why everyone was convinced he was destined to be something great. One of the most frustrating players I have seen here, he has much more ability than he usually shows us. Just does'nt seem interested half the time, and as I have always claimed, he is not a goal scorer and not being able to head the ball is a bit of a handicap for a number one target man. I still hope he comes good, but lost count of the number of times I have said that.
krabb wrote:I now he only had half hour and at best scraps of balls but I really wanted to see him put a shift in ...... and he just doesn’t offer anything ...
captbirdseye wrote:He get a lot of unwarranted shit from City fans when he's basically feeding of scraps with this side. The majority of the games we've played so far we've created absolutely nothing. He's also stuck up top on his own with very little support chasing a lost cause the majority of the time.
I've never got this idea that a player needs to run around for 90mins for the shirt.
Charlie Harper wrote:Personally I think he is a confidence player and right now I think that he thinks he isn't good enough for the PL.
Come on big Ken have a word with yourself before its too late
Lengee wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Personally I think he is a confidence player and right now I think that he thinks he isn't good enough for the PL.
Come on big Ken have a word with yourself before its too late
completely agree- people making him a scapegoat won't help
Lengee wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Personally I think he is a confidence player and right now I think that he thinks he isn't good enough for the PL.
Come on big Ken have a word with yourself before its too late
completely agree- people making him a scapegoat won't help
krabb wrote:Lengee wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Personally I think he is a confidence player and right now I think that he thinks he isn't good enough for the PL.
Come on big Ken have a word with yourself before its too late
completely agree- people making him a scapegoat won't help
Would you stick with him..??..... I’m not using him as a scapegoat but he had a half hour to show that he wanted it.... I think I’d have given him the whole game as we were never likely to get anything out of it tbh....
Lengee wrote:krabb wrote:Lengee wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Personally I think he is a confidence player and right now I think that he thinks he isn't good enough for the PL.
Come on big Ken have a word with yourself before its too late
completely agree- people making him a scapegoat won't help
Would you stick with him..??..... I’m not using him as a scapegoat but he had a half hour to show that he wanted it.... I think I’d have given him the whole game as we were never likely to get anything out of it tbh....
I think the team were deflated defeated and demoralised when he came on and within a couple of minutes it was 4-0. Imo on balance of p!at the final score could have been 7 or 8 nil.The defeat had nothing to do with big Kens performance as a sub. If we are looking to blame someone for the SIZE of defeat and performance then it has to be the management because of how they were set up. Hoilett and Arter as wide men
Morrison against small pacey forwards. Camerassa out of position in Gunners type role. Having said that Man City would almost certainly have won whatever way we set up.
However,I on a positive I would like to see Manga Richards and Cunningham play together in defence because they are comfortable in possession and have some pace!! our goal difference is -11 And our goalie has been very good all games
Also imo Murphy should start as he also has pace.
Whether Zahore plays or not should be determined by who is likely to be most effective against the given opposition. The problem is that Zahore is a big unit and therefore type of player who needs game time to look match fit and to get confidence. On the other hand Reid and Ward work quite well together so it's a tricky one!
actionman wrote:If somebody comes in with 6,000,000 in January would you sell
actionman wrote:If somebody comes in with 6,000,000 in January would you sell
dogfound wrote:started 2 games...should have scored v Newcastle....had the least service I can remember a Cardiff striker get in 40 odd years for that hour in Huddersfield...then got sold a pup last Saturday...3 nil down, heads had dropped, Man City now in training game mode under zero pressure and I just knew as he ran on he A} stood no chance and B } would get shit on here.
Users browsing this forum: Bakedalasker, Bytespider [Bot], Clickagy [Bot], cs_original, Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], lincoln blue, MOZZER1, Paul Keevil, Proximic [Bot], YM Bluebird and 210 guests