RYANBLUE wrote:lets hope he doesn't...!. If it aint broke and all....
bluesince62 wrote:RYANBLUE wrote:lets hope he doesn't...!. If it aint broke and all....
Agree 100% Ryan blue, who knows who we could end up with! Better the devil you know
JJ1927 wrote:He is hedging his bets. He gave Warnock just enough money to give us a fighting chance to stay up and unless we spend heavily in the January window he will be making a big profit this year due to Sky money, probably more than £40 million and possibly as much as £50 million.
If we go down he will have got part of his money back with the promise of further money from parachute payments. Not saying he would, but if he wanted to he could recoup more by player sales.
If we stay up he is laughing. He can sell, take more of the Sky money or invest the Sky money and build a sustainable Premier League side which would further increase the value of the club.
He has got a lot to thank Warnock for!
Forever Blue wrote:Cardiff City have been for sale for the last 4 yrs under Tan, We were nearly sold last summer, but we were still in a big mess behind the scenes.
Now will be his best time, this season Tan has the best chance of getting out, thanks to the Premier League money
Igovernor wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Cardiff City have been for sale for the last 4 yrs under Tan, We were nearly sold last summer, but we were still in a big mess behind the scenes.
Now will be his best time, this season Tan has the best chance of getting out, thanks to the Premier League money
Annis what makes you say we a mess behind the scenes?
bridgendbluebird30 wrote:JJ1927 wrote:He is hedging his bets. He gave Warnock just enough money to give us a fighting chance to stay up and unless we spend heavily in the January window he will be making a big profit this year due to Sky money, probably more than £40 million and possibly as much as £50 million.
If we go down he will have got part of his money back with the promise of further money from parachute payments. Not saying he would, but if he wanted to he could recoup more by player sales.
If we stay up he is laughing. He can sell, take more of the Sky money or invest the Sky money and build a sustainable Premier League side which would further increase the value of the club.
He has got a lot to thank Warnock for!
At this time 24m does not give us a fighting chance of staying up. I believe that the club needed to invest 35-45m. Clear as day that we needed to bring in a striker at the start of the season but didn’t do so. I can see the club bring in a striker in January but unfortunately the majority have been snapped up so it won’t be easy. Add on 15m for a striker and that’s about right. Just look at every other team in the Premiership and what team do you consider are weaker in the striking department than City?
bridgendbluebird30 wrote:JJ1927 wrote:He is hedging his bets. He gave Warnock just enough money to give us a fighting chance to stay up and unless we spend heavily in the January window he will be making a big profit this year due to Sky money, probably more than £40 million and possibly as much as £50 million.
If we go down he will have got part of his money back with the promise of further money from parachute payments. Not saying he would, but if he wanted to he could recoup more by player sales.
If we stay up he is laughing. He can sell, take more of the Sky money or invest the Sky money and build a sustainable Premier League side which would further increase the value of the club.
He has got a lot to thank Warnock for!
At this time 24m does not give us a fighting chance of staying up. I believe that the club needed to invest 35-45m. Clear as day that we needed to bring in a striker at the start of the season but didn’t do so. I can see the club bring in a striker in January but unfortunately the majority have been snapped up so it won’t be easy. Add on 15m for a striker and that’s about right. Just look at every other team in the Premiership and what team do you consider are weaker in the striking department than City?
Sven wrote:I don't know what's in Vincent Tan's mind but it does seem apparent an approach was made last summer, which ultimately failed and/or was rejected
Seems to me he has repaired a lot of the damage and built some major bridges across the previously troubled waters but there are clearly those who still want him gone
I don't necessarily agree with that particular (now) old and some might say tired sentiment; but whilst I can't appreciate why the hostility has to continue, I can understand why some will never forgive and forget
The ones who make me laugh the most are those on here (and elsewhere) who appear to genuinely believe it's 'their' money that Vincent Tan is spending!
It's not, people...it's his! And he has (mainly thanks to a certain Neil Warnock) delivered with it and not only placed us in the Premier League but also in a position of strength to go forward!
As temporary custodian of the club, he will eventually sell and move on when it suits. That is his prerogative!
In the meantime, let's just concentrate on the team itself and enjoy what we currently have, eh?
bridgendbluebird30 wrote:JJ1927 wrote:He is hedging his bets. He gave Warnock just enough money to give us a fighting chance to stay up and unless we spend heavily in the January window he will be making a big profit this year due to Sky money, probably more than £40 million and possibly as much as £50 million.
If we go down he will have got part of his money back with the promise of further money from parachute payments. Not saying he would, but if he wanted to he could recoup more by player sales.
If we stay up he is laughing. He can sell, take more of the Sky money or invest the Sky money and build a sustainable Premier League side which would further increase the value of the club.
He has got a lot to thank Warnock for!
At this time 24m does not give us a fighting chance of staying up. I believe that the club needed to invest 35-45m. Clear as day that we needed to bring in a striker at the start of the season but didn’t do so. I can see the club bring in a striker in January but unfortunately the majority have been snapped up so it won’t be easy. Add on 15m for a striker and that’s about right. Just look at every other team in the Premiership and what team do you consider are weaker in the striking department than City?
RhiwEbbwBluebird wrote:Im happy with tan and the way the club is being run at the moment, but if a mega rich saudi wanted to come in to take us to the next level then great lol... sure it was a cousin or someone associated to the man city owners the other day who nearly bought out liverpool, imagine someone like that seeing cardiff city as a project like the man city one!
Users browsing this forum: Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], mikeyblue, Proximic [Bot], zapo and 175 guests