" PL Procedure For Postponed Matches "

A forum for all things Cardiff City

" PL Procedure For Postponed Matches "

Postby castleblue » Tue Mar 20, 2018 6:23 pm

" PL Procedure For Postponed Matches "

Many have asked over the last few days what exactly is the correct procedure to follow for postponed matches and who has the authority to postpone matches. Here is the PL procedure in the 2017/18 PL Handbook.


L.12. A League Match shall not be postponed or abandoned except:

L.12.1. when on the date fixed for it to be played either the Home Club or the Visiting Club is competing in a competition permitted by Rules L.9.1, L.9.2,and L.9.3;

L.12.2. with the approval of or on the instructions of the officiating referee;

L.12.3. by order of the police;

L.12.4. by order of any other authority exercising its statutory powers to that effect; or

L.12.5. on the instructions of or with the prior written consent of the Board.

L.13. Where it is proposed to postpone a League Match pursuant to Rule L.12.4 on the grounds of safety, the appropriate Official of the Home Club shall:

L.13.1. complete and make available on request to the League all relevant risk assessment documentation; and

L.13.2. time permitting, consult with the officiating referee, the police and the chairman of the Club’s safety advisory group and ensure that the match delegate appointed to attend the League Match pursuant to Rule L.17 is fully briefed as to the reasons for the postponement.


L.14. Upon a League Match being postponed or abandoned in accordance with Rules

L.12.1, L.12.2, L.12.3, or L.12.4 the Home Club shall forthwith inform the Board, and the Board will thereupon exercise its power under Rule L.1.2 and fix a date and kick-off time of the re-arranged League Match.


" Guıdance "

Clubs are reminded of their obligation pursuant to Rule L.2 to use their best endeavours to ensure that all
League Matches take place on the date and at the kick-off time fixed for them. Pursuant to this, Clubs are
expected to do all they can to address any concerns raised by a statutory authority


I'm sure the EFL apply a very similar process and in my opinion it leaves Derby County deep in the smelly stuff.



:bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf:
User avatar
castleblue
 
Posts: 6110
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:21 pm
Location: Caerphilly

" PL Procedure For Postponed Matches "

Advertisement

Advertisement
Login or Register to remove this ad.

Re: PL Procedure For Postponed Matches

Postby pembroke allan » Tue Mar 20, 2018 6:40 pm

castleblue wrote:Many have asked over the last few days what exactly is the correct procedure to follow for postponed matches and who has the authority to postpone matches. Here is the PL procedure in the 2017/18 PL Handbook.

L.12. A League Match shall not be postponed or abandoned except:
L.12.1. when on the date fixed for it to be played either the Home Club or the Visiting Club is competing in a competition permitted by Rules L.9.1, L.9.2,and L.9.3;
L.12.2. with the approval of or on the instructions of the officiating referee;
L.12.3. by order of the police;
L.12.4. by order of any other authority exercising its statutory powers to that effect; or
L.12.5. on the instructions of or with the prior written consent of the Board.
L.13. Where it is proposed to postpone a League Match pursuant to Rule L.12.4 on the grounds of safety, the appropriate Official of the Home Club shall:
L.13.1. complete and make available on request to the League all relevant risk assessment documentation; and
L.13.2. time permitting, consult with the officiating referee, the police and the chairman of the Club’s safety advisory group and ensure that the match delegate appointed to attend the League Match pursuant to Rule L.17 is fully briefed as to the reasons for the postponement.
L.14. Upon a League Match being postponed or abandoned in accordance with Rules
L.12.1, L.12.2, L.12.3, or L.12.4 the Home Club shall forthwith inform the Board, and the Board will thereupon exercise its power under Rule L.1.2 and fix a date and kick-off time of the re-arranged League Match.

Guıdance
Clubs are reminded of their obligation pursuant to Rule L.2 to use their best endeavours to ensure that all
League Matches take place on the date and at the kick-off time fixed for them. Pursuant to this, Clubs are
expected to do all they can to address any concerns raised by a statutory authority


I'm sure the EFL apply a very similar process and in my opinion it leaves Derby County deep in the smelly stuff.



:bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf:




Well it's clear that the proper authority was not informed prior to game, although sag did say they aproved postponement that certainly was not correct procedure! The damning thing is last paragraph make attempt to get game on? they did no such thing that's obvious as no one from club at ground was there?
User avatar
pembroke allan
 
Posts: 29543
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: PL Procedure For Postponed Matches

Postby castleblue » Tue Mar 20, 2018 6:43 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
castleblue wrote:Many have asked over the last few days what exactly is the correct procedure to follow for postponed matches and who has the authority to postpone matches. Here is the PL procedure in the 2017/18 PL Handbook.

L.12. A League Match shall not be postponed or abandoned except:
L.12.1. when on the date fixed for it to be played either the Home Club or the Visiting Club is competing in a competition permitted by Rules L.9.1, L.9.2,and L.9.3;
L.12.2. with the approval of or on the instructions of the officiating referee;
L.12.3. by order of the police;
L.12.4. by order of any other authority exercising its statutory powers to that effect; or
L.12.5. on the instructions of or with the prior written consent of the Board.
L.13. Where it is proposed to postpone a League Match pursuant to Rule L.12.4 on the grounds of safety, the appropriate Official of the Home Club shall:
L.13.1. complete and make available on request to the League all relevant risk assessment documentation; and
L.13.2. time permitting, consult with the officiating referee, the police and the chairman of the Club’s safety advisory group and ensure that the match delegate appointed to attend the League Match pursuant to Rule L.17 is fully briefed as to the reasons for the postponement.
L.14. Upon a League Match being postponed or abandoned in accordance with Rules
L.12.1, L.12.2, L.12.3, or L.12.4 the Home Club shall forthwith inform the Board, and the Board will thereupon exercise its power under Rule L.1.2 and fix a date and kick-off time of the re-arranged League Match.

Guıdance
Clubs are reminded of their obligation pursuant to Rule L.2 to use their best endeavours to ensure that all
League Matches take place on the date and at the kick-off time fixed for them. Pursuant to this, Clubs are
expected to do all they can to address any concerns raised by a statutory authority


I'm sure the EFL apply a very similar process and in my opinion it leaves Derby County deep in the smelly stuff.



:bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf:




Well it's clear that the proper authority was not informed prior to game, although sag did say they aproved postponement that certainly was not correct procedure! The damning thing is last paragraph make attempt to get game on? they did no such thing that's obvious as no one from club at ground was there?


I would love to get a copy of the risk assessment to back up the safety claim. That is if one was ever done. :?


:bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf:
User avatar
castleblue
 
Posts: 6110
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:21 pm
Location: Caerphilly

Re: PL Procedure For Postponed Matches

Postby pembroke allan » Tue Mar 20, 2018 7:24 pm

castleblue wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
castleblue wrote:Many have asked over the last few days what exactly is the correct procedure to follow for postponed matches and who has the authority to postpone matches. Here is the PL procedure in the 2017/18 PL Handbook.

L.12. A League Match shall not be postponed or abandoned except:
L.12.1. when on the date fixed for it to be played either the Home Club or the Visiting Club is competing in a competition permitted by Rules L.9.1, L.9.2,and L.9.3;
L.12.2. with the approval of or on the instructions of the officiating referee;
L.12.3. by order of the police;
L.12.4. by order of any other authority exercising its statutory powers to that effect; or
L.12.5. on the instructions of or with the prior written consent of the Board.
L.13. Where it is proposed to postpone a League Match pursuant to Rule L.12.4 on the grounds of safety, the appropriate Official of the Home Club shall:
L.13.1. complete and make available on request to the League all relevant risk assessment documentation; and
L.13.2. time permitting, consult with the officiating referee, the police and the chairman of the Club’s safety advisory group and ensure that the match delegate appointed to attend the League Match pursuant to Rule L.17 is fully briefed as to the reasons for the postponement.
L.14. Upon a League Match being postponed or abandoned in accordance with Rules
L.12.1, L.12.2, L.12.3, or L.12.4 the Home Club shall forthwith inform the Board, and the Board will thereupon exercise its power under Rule L.1.2 and fix a date and kick-off time of the re-arranged League Match.

Guıdance
Clubs are reminded of their obligation pursuant to Rule L.2 to use their best endeavours to ensure that all
League Matches take place on the date and at the kick-off time fixed for them. Pursuant to this, Clubs are
expected to do all they can to address any concerns raised by a statutory authority


I'm sure the EFL apply a very similar process and in my opinion it leaves Derby County deep in the smelly stuff.



:bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf:




Well it's clear that the proper authority was not informed prior to game, although sag did say they aproved postponement that certainly was not correct procedure! The damning thing is last paragraph make attempt to get game on? they did no such thing that's obvious as no one from club at ground was there?


I would love to get a copy of the risk assessment to back up the safety claim. That is if one was ever done. :?


:bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf:




The risk assessment would be for stadium and the ground it stands on and car parks and public areas , Public rds is council responsibility the ground was obviously OK so was surrounding area! So not sure what risk assessment they undertook? Get feeling they pre empted the weather as being bad but it wasn't and they were cought with their snowballs down. :laughing6:
User avatar
pembroke allan
 
Posts: 29543
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: PL Procedure For Postponed Matches

Postby Mr Potato » Tue Mar 20, 2018 7:43 pm

So derby did the councils job as haven’t they already said it was the surrounding areas not the stadium. they have come out with so much crap I don’t know what is what anymore.
Mr Potato
 
Posts: 645
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: PL Procedure For Postponed Matches

Postby epping blue » Tue Mar 20, 2018 7:44 pm

This is all getting bogged down with procedure when it should be really about the actual conditions at and in the vicinity of the ground. As yet I haven't seen a single photograph of snow on the paving or roadways in the vicinity of the ground.

I've read plenty of anecdotal accounts of the roads in Derby being clear of all bar a bit of slush by 8am.What the conditions were like 10 miles away in the Peak District should have no bearing on whether or not this game could take place.

If the conditions were poor then what is the excuse to Derby for making no attempt to deal with the snow. Why was the council who performed so well in the lead up to the Fulham game so deficient for this game ? There was after all no comparison in the severity of the conditions. The answer to the last questions is of course there was very little to clear.
epping blue
 
Posts: 1749
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:09 pm

Re: PL Procedure For Postponed Matches

Postby pembroke allan » Tue Mar 20, 2018 7:57 pm

Mr Potato wrote:So derby did the councils job as haven’t they already said it was the surrounding areas not the stadium. they have come out with so much crap I don’t know what is what anymore.



Truth is derby did sweet fa to try and get game on as per guidelines so they are culpable! Their problem is no effort was made by themselves on morning of match to make stadium areas safe cannot blame snow as wasn't any from 4am and picture evidence is damning inthe extreme.as castle says they are fcked. :laughing6:
Council did their bit with gritting public rds, as all local amenities were open it appears pride park was only area effected by snow on Derbyshire. :roll:
User avatar
pembroke allan
 
Posts: 29543
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: PL Procedure For Postponed Matches

Postby Mr Potato » Tue Mar 20, 2018 8:42 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Mr Potato wrote:So derby did the councils job as haven’t they already said it was the surrounding areas not the stadium. they have come out with so much crap I don’t know what is what anymore.



Truth is derby did sweet fa to try and get game on as per guidelines so they are culpable! Their problem is no effort was made by themselves on morning of match to make stadium areas safe cannot blame snow as wasn't any from 4am and picture evidence is damning inthe extreme.as castle says they are fcked. :laughing6:
Council did their bit with gritting public rds, as all local amenities were open it appears pride park was only area effected by snow on Derbyshire. :roll:


Surely this just makes it harder for the EFL not to act, SAG supporting a club decision (eventually) that it cannot make to postpone a game they made no effort to ensure was played. Police play a blinder by stating that discussions were held in the days leading up to the game but it was a club decision. Which to me is now implying that Derby new full well they were postponing this game, using the weather as the perfect excuse, expecting SAG and Police to confirm which they haven’t. No wonder Rowett was all over me shop in is pre match conference, he’s been told game is off, it’s just not yet common knowledge.
Mr Potato
 
Posts: 645
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: PL Procedure For Postponed Matches

Postby pembroke allan » Tue Mar 20, 2018 8:50 pm

Mr Potato wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Mr Potato wrote:So derby did the councils job as haven’t they already said it was the surrounding areas not the stadium. they have come out with so much crap I don’t know what is what anymore.



Truth is derby did sweet fa to try and get game on as per guidelines so they are culpable! Their problem is no effort was made by themselves on morning of match to make stadium areas safe cannot blame snow as wasn't any from 4am and picture evidence is damning inthe extreme.as castle says they are fcked. :laughing6:
Council did their bit with gritting public rds, as all local amenities were open it appears pride park was only area effected by snow on Derbyshire. :roll:


Surely this just makes it harder for the EFL not to act, SAG supporting a club decision (eventually) that it cannot make to postpone a game they made no effort to ensure was played. Police play a blinder by stating that discussions were held in the days leading up to the game but it was a club decision. Which to me is now implying that Derby new full well they were postponing this game, using the weather as the perfect excuse, expecting SAG and Police to confirm which they haven’t. No wonder Rowett was all over me shop in is pre match conference, he’s been told game is off, it’s just not yet common knowledge.



yes they have not followed protocol and the evidence as seen on here shows they already decided to postponed the game before consulting sag or police bad move totally :thumbup:
User avatar
pembroke allan
 
Posts: 29543
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: " PL Procedure For Postponed Matches "

Postby Forever Blue » Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:40 pm

The Derby County v Cardiff City evidence, the key questions and what the EFL are looking at


By John Doel

Wednesday 21st March 2018

By now, pretty much every Cardiff City fan will be familiar with the basics of what unfolded at Derby County on Sunday.

Long story short, Derby called the game off after heavy snow, Cardiff fans were very unhappy, Neil Warnock was apoplectic and we now have ourselves a rearranged game for April 24.

In between there have have been demands from Bluebirds CEO Ken Choo for Derby to reimburse every Bluebirds supporter who made the trip, while the EFL have asked for observations from both clubs on the matter after initially declaring themselves satisfied with Derby's account.

A series of statements have been issued by various bodies (Derbyshire Police, Derby County, Derby City Council) but, in truth, they have largely served to muddy the waters and fuel conspiracy theories that, to use Neil Warnock's words, this was some sort of "stitch-up" from a Derby County team ravaged by injury and unable to buy a win in recent weeks.

As is often the case, the devil will be in the detail and the EFL's investigation into matters will need to focus on the grey areas that currently exist amid the information in the public domain.

Here's a look at what we've been trying to find out, what responses we've had, the key issues and the questions that remain unanswered.





What do the rules say about the process that should be followed?

The whole rumpus in terms of potential repercussions boils down to what were Derby required to do and did they do it?

The EFL previously told us that the club is required to consult with police and the local Safety Advisory Group (SAG) before a game is called off in these circumstances.

A document must be completed that provides an evidence base for the decision to postpone, which is then sent to the Football League to give its approval. According to the Football League on Monday, this document was completed.

The EFL have so far been unable to provide us with the specifics of what the rules actually say about the full process that is required, although it is accepted that both clubs must endeavour to do all they can to get a game on.





What actually happened on Sunday morning?

The information we have is that a Derby County official or officials decided the game should be called off shortly before 7am on Sunday morning, specifically citing the fact persistent heavy snowfall overnight had made the surrounding areas at Pride Park Stadium unsafe for supporters, staff and officials.

As we know, Cardiff City fans and Bluebirds midfielder Greg Halford have shared pictures of the walkways and roads around the ground that appear to show the area largely snow-free later that morning.

The referee did not make the decision to postpone the game and the Bluebirds were not consulted for their views beforehand.

When Cardiff turned up at Pride Park on Sunday morning, with no travel issues, there were no Derby club officials to greet them.

A later statement from Derby in the wake of Warnock's stinging criticism was then issued in which the club insisted they "fully complied with all the matchday operational regulations surrounding the postponement of the game".

They added: "The decision was fully supported by the independent Safety Advisory Group (SAG), who are responsible for ensuring that the club complies with the terms and conditions of our Safety Certificate."





What is the Safety Advisory Group (SAG)

Our colleagues at the Derby Telegraph have put together this informative guide to the SAG in the area.

The local SAG in Derby features two representatives from Derby City Council and is chaired by Mike Kay, Head of Environmental Protection, Licensing, Housing Standards and Emergency Planning.

The SAG also includes a senior fire officer, a senior ambulance officer, a senior police officer, a police liaison officer and a representative from the Sports Ground Safety Authority inspectorate.

Derby County are not represented on the SAG but the club's head of safety and operations, Nigel Wood, liaises with the group on a regular basis.





So what involvement did the SAG actually have?

Around 7.30am a call was made by a Derby County official to the chair of the local SAG, Mike Kay, who is Head of Environmental Protection, Licensing, Housing Standards and Emergency Planning at Derby City Council.

Now, things have actually got a bit confusing here as a result of somewhat conflicting public statements issued by Derby City Council to WalesOnline on Monday and Tuesday.

The first read: "Derby County Football Club took the decision to postpone the Sky Bet Championship fixture at home to Cardiff City on Sunday due to the weather conditions and the health and safety of people travelling to the ground. This was the club’s decision.

"As Chair of the Safety Advisory Group, the Council representative was subsequently informed.

The second read: “Further to our previous statement on the postponement of the Derby County versus Cardiff City game, the Council’s representatives on the Safety Advisory Group were consulted and fully supportive of the club’s subsequent decision to postpone the fixture for public safety reasons.”

On the face of it, this appears to be a u-turn from Derby City Council, particularly if you focus your attention on the bolded words above. However, it seems clear nuance and subjectivity could to be key in this whole thing.

We understand the chair of the SAG was not in Derby when he received the call at 7.30am and was told by the club they thought the game should be called off. Although he was not on site himself he told the club he had no issue and was supportive of the decision given the information they provided him - hence the second statement. So, the crux of it could be whether it's accepted that this conversation constitutes 'consultation' or not.

What the level of consultation required by the EFL is again unclear as they have so far been unable to provide us with that information.







What about the role of the police?

Derbyshire Police have been pretty consistent here. This was not their decision, they merely helped deliver information in the aftermath of the decision on Sunday morning.

They've told us they did have dialogue with Derby County's safety team and other agencies during the days before and on the morning of the scheduled fixture.

So, it's an established fact the police had no involvement in actually making the decision. The natural next question is did they offer advice to the club that would have led them to make the decision they did? We understand the police did not offer any direct advice to Derby on the Sunday morning suggesting they should call the game off.

The role of the police in this situation is largely to just help share information around things like road closures and general public safety advice.

Perhaps significantly though, a police statement at 8.50am on Sunday morning contained the following words: "We are continuing to advise people to only make necessary journeys following overnight snow, which is continuing in many areas into this morning."






What was the travel situation in Derby on Sunday morning?

It's clear snow was a big issue in the wider Derbyshire area on the weekend, with an Amber weather warning in place between Saturday afternoon and 9am on Sunday morning.

Police stated seven A roads were closed in the north West of the county on Sunday morning, largely around the Buxton and Glossop area. For context, the closest confirmed road closure was approximately 30 miles from Pride Park.

Buses in Derby appear to have been largely running on Sunday morning, however, with Arriva Midlands East stating there were "minor changes" to the normal schedule affecting two services around three or four miles from the ground.





We've already covered Derby's statements and they are publicly adamant they have done nothing wrong and that all proper processes have been followed.

There are two reasons why Cardiff City fans are generally unhappy with their statements. The first is the apparent disparity between pictures like the one Greg Halford tweeted and the club's insistence the game was called off because "the surrounding areas at Pride Park Stadium were unsafe after heavy snowfall."

The other point Cardiff fans will focus their attention on is the declaration the "the decision was fully supported by the independent Safety Advisory Group (SAG)."

Given we know the chair of the SAG who was contacted on Sunday morning was nowhere near Derby at the time and simply gave his support to a decision neither he nor the police had any involvement in making, is that enough? That, of course is for the Football League to decide.

For the record, we have contacted Derby County since their last statement and asked the following five questions.

1. Who exactly did the club speak to on Sunday morning before making the decision and what exactly was the advice given that led to the decision being made?

2. Was official documentation completed and sent to the Football League?

3. Did the club realise the game could be in jeopardy on the Saturday and was this communicated to Cardiff City and their fans?

4. What discussions, if any, were held with other agencies in the days prior to Sunday's postponement. What advice was given?

5. Do you have a response to Cardiff City CEO Ken Choo's statement that "Derby County need to agree to pay Cardiff fans back in full the cost of tickets and travel"?

Derby County responded by saying they have no further comment to make.






What are Cardiff City fans doing now?

Cardiff City Supporters' Club chief Vince Alm is determined to get to the bottom of what happened and is unhappy that travelling fans were given no warning the match could be in jeopardy.

He says the first he knew of the game being called off was when he received a phone call from a South Wales Police representative at 8.06am when coaches carrying Bluebirds fans had already crossed the border into England.

He has sent a 4-page letter to the EFL demanding answers but is yet to receive a response. The dossier contains more than 20 pictures taken by fans in Derby on Sunday morning showing the relatively snow-free conditions in the vicinity of the stadium.





What happens next?

The EFL are currently digesting the "observations" they have requested from both clubs and we go from there.

This isn't likely to be something that drags on though, with a resolution one way or the other likely to be in the coming days.
Attachments
Pride-Park-800am-18-3-18.jpg
Pride-Park-800am-18-3-18.jpg (68.45 KiB) Viewed 334 times
Annis Jnr Author and Publisher of 7 Books.

My 7th Book is Available Now "MY STORY"

http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/books/buy-books/
http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/news/

My email : annisabraham@aol.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/annisabraham
User avatar
Forever Blue
Admin
 
Posts: 163300
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:30 am



Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Clickagy [Bot], Clusterman, Don Keydick, Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Proximic [Bot] and 182 guests

Disclaimer :
The views and comments entered in these forums are personal and are not necessarily those of the management of this board.
The management of this board is not responsible for the content of any external internet sites.