Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:24 pm
Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:24 pm
Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:35 pm
Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:36 pm
NIBluebird wrote:Plus a lot more in last two months
Never knew it was that much
Good info
Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:08 pm
Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:16 pm
mallo wrote:Peanuts to what tan is owed - doubt go into team probably just keeping cash balances going at rip of stadium
Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:17 pm
Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:26 pm
Sven wrote:All steps in the right direction for City!
The team do well, the TV companies take notice and want a piece of the action, which brings in much needed revenue, which (even in comparatively small amounts) helps reduce debt and builds on the profile of the club
Should the dream occur at the end of this season, the financial rewards will be immense for a club like ours and (unlike last time) I honestly believe we are in a far better position to take advantage and do the job properly!
Sat Mar 03, 2018 10:17 pm
Forever Blue wrote:mallo wrote:Peanuts to what tan is owed - doubt go into team probably just keeping cash balances going at rip of stadium
Mallo, u mean the debts Tan ran up.
Only way Tan will get the debts he ran up back is Cardiff promoted to the Premier League.
In the last 4 years we received about £140mill from Sky tv and really that itself should of cleared any debts.
Rem when Tan arrived our debts were about £28-£35mill, then under Tan they rose to about £174MILL.
Cardiff's debt was £174m at the end of the 2013/14 financial year
Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:08 pm
Forever Blue wrote:mallo wrote:Peanuts to what tan is owed - doubt go into team probably just keeping cash balances going at rip of stadium
Mallo, u mean the debts Tan ran up.
Only way Tan will get the debts he ran up back is Cardiff promoted to the Premier League.
In the last 4 years we received about £140mill from Sky tv and really that itself should of cleared any debts.
Rem when Tan arrived our debts were about £28-£35mill, then under Tan they rose to about £174MILL.
Cardiff's debt was £174m at the end of the 2013/14 financial year
Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:09 pm
Igovernor wrote:Forever Blue wrote:mallo wrote:Peanuts to what tan is owed - doubt go into team probably just keeping cash balances going at rip of stadium
Mallo, u mean the debts Tan ran up.
Only way Tan will get the debts he ran up back is Cardiff promoted to the Premier League.
In the last 4 years we received about £140mill from Sky tv and really that itself should of cleared any debts.
Rem when Tan arrived our debts were about £28-£35mill, then under Tan they rose to about £174MILL.
Cardiff's debt was £174m at the end of the 2013/14 financial year
Annis if we received £140m off sky then that would mean that sky televised us 1.4million times ? also did we not owe Sam £35m without all the other large debts?
Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:09 pm
Forever Blue wrote:mallo wrote:Peanuts to what tan is owed - doubt go into team probably just keeping cash balances going at rip of stadium
Mallo, u mean the debts Tan ran up.
Only way Tan will get the debts he ran up back is Cardiff promoted to the Premier League.
In the last 4 years we received about £140mill from Sky tv and really that itself should of cleared any debts.
Rem when Tan arrived our debts were about £28-£35mill, then under Tan they rose to about £174MILL.
Cardiff's debt was £174m at the end of the 2013/14 financial year
Sun Mar 04, 2018 8:25 am
Igovernor wrote:Forever Blue wrote:mallo wrote:Peanuts to what tan is owed - doubt go into team probably just keeping cash balances going at rip of stadium
Mallo, u mean the debts Tan ran up.
Only way Tan will get the debts he ran up back is Cardiff promoted to the Premier League.
In the last 4 years we received about £140mill from Sky tv and really that itself should of cleared any debts.
Rem when Tan arrived our debts were about £28-£35mill, then under Tan they rose to about £174MILL.
Cardiff's debt was £174m at the end of the 2013/14 financial year
Annis if we received £140m off sky then that would mean that sky televised us 1.4million times ? also did we not owe Sam £35m without all the other large debts?
Sun Mar 04, 2018 8:27 am
maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:mallo wrote:Peanuts to what tan is owed - doubt go into team probably just keeping cash balances going at rip of stadium
Mallo, u mean the debts Tan ran up.
Only way Tan will get the debts he ran up back is Cardiff promoted to the Premier League.
In the last 4 years we received about £140mill from Sky tv and really that itself should of cleared any debts.
Rem when Tan arrived our debts were about £28-£35mill, then under Tan they rose to about £174MILL.
Cardiff's debt was £174m at the end of the 2013/14 financial year
Annis those figures aren’t correct at all.
Plus when Tan took over we were losing over a million a month.
We are now in debt to one person who is changing that to equity so we are far better off.
Sun Mar 04, 2018 10:09 am
Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:mallo wrote:Peanuts to what tan is owed - doubt go into team probably just keeping cash balances going at rip of stadium
Mallo, u mean the debts Tan ran up.
Only way Tan will get the debts he ran up back is Cardiff promoted to the Premier League.
In the last 4 years we received about £140mill from Sky tv and really that itself should of cleared any debts.
Rem when Tan arrived our debts were about £28-£35mill, then under Tan they rose to about £174MILL.
Cardiff's debt was £174m at the end of the 2013/14 financial year
Annis those figures aren’t correct at all.
Plus when Tan took over we were losing over a million a month.
We are now in debt to one person who is changing that to equity so we are far better off.
A fact
Cardiff's debt was £174m at the end of the 2013/14 financial year
Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:12 am
Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:21 am
Jules wrote:Annis how did you manage to turn a positive into a negative there?
Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:49 am
Forever Blue wrote:Jules wrote:Annis how did you manage to turn a positive into a negative there?
Jules, I start the topic positive as usual and the usual suspects change and drag me in to Tan negative.
Shocked this time as it was Mallo, who can’t stand Tan.
I wanted this to be a positive topic.
Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:08 pm
Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:09 pm
Igovernor wrote:Just one last post all the money off sky had to pay for premiership wages look at how much deadwood that slade had to get rid of and us losing over a million per month over 4 years
(£48m)it is soon eaten up so no way that that Sky money would ever come close to paying off our debt.
Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:55 pm
Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:06 pm
theclaw wrote:It’s great to see us getting plenty tv coverage and paid handsomely for the privilege.Long May it continue
Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:08 pm
maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jules wrote:Annis how did you manage to turn a positive into a negative there?
Jules, I start the topic positive as usual and the usual suspects change and drag me in to Tan negative.
Shocked this time as it was Mallo, who can’t stand Tan.
I wanted this to be a positive topic.
Makes no sense Annis. Mallo mentioned Tan and then you waded in size 13s. Didn’t have to respond.
Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:21 pm
Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jules wrote:Annis how did you manage to turn a positive into a negative there?
Jules, I start the topic positive as usual and the usual suspects change and drag me in to Tan negative.
Shocked this time as it was Mallo, who can’t stand Tan.
I wanted this to be a positive topic.
Makes no sense Annis. Mallo mentioned Tan and then you waded in size 13s. Didn’t have to respond.
Neil, I don't want to talk about Tan, I actually stay of other fans topics regarding Tan nowadays, so I would prefer his name stays of mine, I will never agree regarding Tan, so pointless involving me with him
As to Mallo,Mallo actually detests Tans.
Sun Mar 04, 2018 5:22 pm
maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jules wrote:Annis how did you manage to turn a positive into a negative there?
Jules, I start the topic positive as usual and the usual suspects change and drag me in to Tan negative.
Shocked this time as it was Mallo, who can’t stand Tan.
I wanted this to be a positive topic.
Makes no sense Annis. Mallo mentioned Tan and then you waded in size 13s. Didn’t have to respond.
Neil, I don't want to talk about Tan, I actually stay of other fans topics regarding Tan nowadays, so I would prefer his name stays of mine, I will never agree regarding Tan, so pointless involving me with him
As to Mallo,Mallo actually detests Tans.
And he has reasons to hate those that represented Tan at Cardiff.
You could easily have ignored Mallo’s comment and not mentioned Tan and the debt though.
Sun Mar 04, 2018 5:30 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jules wrote:Annis how did you manage to turn a positive into a negative there?
Jules, I start the topic positive as usual and the usual suspects change and drag me in to Tan negative.
Shocked this time as it was Mallo, who can’t stand Tan.
I wanted this to be a positive topic.
Makes no sense Annis. Mallo mentioned Tan and then you waded in size 13s. Didn’t have to respond.
Neil, I don't want to talk about Tan, I actually stay of other fans topics regarding Tan nowadays, so I would prefer his name stays of mine, I will never agree regarding Tan, so pointless involving me with him
As to Mallo,Mallo actually detests Tans.
And he has reasons to hate those that represented Tan at Cardiff.
You could easily have ignored Mallo’s comment and not mentioned Tan and the debt though.
Annis misunderstood what Mallo was implying. Mallo brought the Tan debt into the subject and implied the tv money is peanuts compared to the debt owed to Tan and is most likely being used to help some of the running costs.
Even so it is extra income not to be sneezed at and it is all down to Warnock getting the attention of the TV companies thanks to the success he has brought in.
Sun Mar 04, 2018 6:01 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jules wrote:Annis how did you manage to turn a positive into a negative there?
Jules, I start the topic positive as usual and the usual suspects change and drag me in to Tan negative.
Shocked this time as it was Mallo, who can’t stand Tan.
I wanted this to be a positive topic.
Makes no sense Annis. Mallo mentioned Tan and then you waded in size 13s. Didn’t have to respond.
Neil, I don't want to talk about Tan, I actually stay of other fans topics regarding Tan nowadays, so I would prefer his name stays of mine, I will never agree regarding Tan, so pointless involving me with him
As to Mallo,Mallo actually detests Tans.
And he has reasons to hate those that represented Tan at Cardiff.
You could easily have ignored Mallo’s comment and not mentioned Tan and the debt though.
Annis misunderstood what Mallo was implying. Mallo brought the Tan debt into the subject and implied the tv money is peanuts compared to the debt owed to Tan and is most likely being used to help some of the running costs.
Even so it is extra income not to be sneezed at and it is all down to Warnock getting the attention of the TV companies thanks to the success he has brought in.
Sun Mar 04, 2018 6:03 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jules wrote:Annis how did you manage to turn a positive into a negative there?
Jules, I start the topic positive as usual and the usual suspects change and drag me in to Tan negative.
Shocked this time as it was Mallo, who can’t stand Tan.
I wanted this to be a positive topic.
Makes no sense Annis. Mallo mentioned Tan and then you waded in size 13s. Didn’t have to respond.
Neil, I don't want to talk about Tan, I actually stay of other fans topics regarding Tan nowadays, so I would prefer his name stays of mine, I will never agree regarding Tan, so pointless involving me with him
As to Mallo,Mallo actually detests Tans.
And he has reasons to hate those that represented Tan at Cardiff.
You could easily have ignored Mallo’s comment and not mentioned Tan and the debt though.
Annis misunderstood what Mallo was implying. Mallo brought the Tan debt into the subject and implied the tv money is peanuts compared to the debt owed to Tan and is most likely being used to help some of the running costs.
Even so it is extra income not to be sneezed at and it is all down to Warnock getting the attention of the TV companies thanks to the success he has brought in.
Spot on Ian
A positive made in to a negative by the usual suspects .
Sun Mar 04, 2018 7:20 pm
Sven wrote:All steps in the right direction for City!
The team do well, the TV companies take notice and want a piece of the action, which brings in much needed revenue, which (even in comparatively small amounts) helps reduce debt and builds on the profile of the club
Should the dream occur at the end of this season, the financial rewards will be immense for a club like ours and (unlike last time) I honestly believe we are in a far better position to take advantage and do the job properly!
Sun Mar 04, 2018 9:28 pm
Daya wrote:Sven wrote:All steps in the right direction for City!
The team do well, the TV companies take notice and want a piece of the action, which brings in much needed revenue, which (even in comparatively small amounts) helps reduce debt and builds on the profile of the club
Should the dream occur at the end of this season, the financial rewards will be immense for a club like ours and (unlike last time) I honestly believe we are in a far better position to take advantage and do the job properly!
Your only 2nd and can't even get above wolves!