Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:48 am
Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:49 am
Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:05 pm
Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:15 pm
Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:27 pm
Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:30 pm
Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:32 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:He says no more money will be spent unless players are sold and replacements are needed, but Warnock said last night he has put in a bid for a player?
I can only assume this player is dependant on Bennett joining Fulham.
Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:32 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:He says no more money will be spent unless players are sold and replacements are needed, but Warnock said last night he has put in a bid for a player?
I can only assume this player is dependant on Bennett joining Fulham.
Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:43 pm
Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:21 pm
Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:36 pm
Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:38 pm
Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:05 pm
Wed Aug 16, 2017 8:55 pm
City Slicker wrote:I think he's a very silly man in many ways. His failed project has been rescued by the installation of a top class manager and he could possibly be on the brink of the best period in the club's history. I fully expect Warnock not to make the same mistakes Malky made if we achieve promotion this time.
If we get up and stay up he will be lauded by most of the fans (which seems to be his main motivation) and he would reap more than the £118m he says he's lost. In the larger scheme of things it's small beer. He would do better to man up, forget the past and look forward to a bright future with all of us.
Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:00 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:He says no more money will be spent unless players are sold and replacements are needed, but Warnock said last night he has put in a bid for a player?
I can only assume this player is dependant on Bennett joining Fulham.
Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:42 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:He says no more money will be spent unless players are sold and replacements are needed, but Warnock said last night he has put in a bid for a player?
I can only assume this player is dependant on Bennett joining Fulham.
He also said only £3m was spent But Tomlin was reported to be £2.9m Patterson £400k and Ward £1.6m which is £4.9m. If the £3m is correct then we must have either paid much less than reported fees or they are heavily dependent on promotion, appearance and goals incentives.
Thu Aug 17, 2017 7:05 am
dogfound wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:He says no more money will be spent unless players are sold and replacements are needed, but Warnock said last night he has put in a bid for a player?
I can only assume this player is dependant on Bennett joining Fulham.
He also said only £3m was spent But Tomlin was reported to be £2.9m Patterson £400k and Ward £1.6m which is £4.9m. If the £3m is correct then we must have either paid much less than reported fees or they are heavily dependent on promotion, appearance and goals incentives.
maybe its 3mill net after the huws and saadi fees.