Sat Jun 24, 2017 3:30 pm
Sat Jun 24, 2017 3:32 pm
Sat Jun 24, 2017 3:40 pm
City Slicker wrote:We're already looking for a pacy, creative midfielder which will cost money. Another £1 million or so will help that cause nicely. I'd say bite their hand off!
Sat Jun 24, 2017 4:20 pm
Forever Blue wrote:City Slicker wrote:We're already looking for a pacy, creative midfielder which will cost money. Another £1 million or so will help that cause nicely. I'd say bite their hand off!
If they really want to give that much money, I say the same, bite their hands off
Sat Jun 24, 2017 7:42 pm
Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:36 pm
Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:38 pm
Forever Blue wrote:City Slicker wrote:We're already looking for a pacy, creative midfielder which will cost money. Another £1 million or so will help that cause nicely. I'd say bite their hand off!
If they really want to give that much money, I say the same, bite their hands off
Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:26 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Forever Blue wrote:City Slicker wrote:We're already looking for a pacy, creative midfielder which will cost money. Another £1 million or so will help that cause nicely. I'd say bite their hand off!
If they really want to give that much money, I say the same, bite their hands off
Same here we would be mad not taking the cash. If all these teams think he is so brilliant then they won't mind paying £1.5m plus a 20% sell on clause
Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:50 pm
dogfound wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Forever Blue wrote:City Slicker wrote:We're already looking for a pacy, creative midfielder which will cost money. Another £1 million or so will help that cause nicely. I'd say bite their hand off!
If they really want to give that much money, I say the same, bite their hands off
Same here we would be mad not taking the cash. If all these teams think he is so brilliant then they won't mind paying £1.5m plus a 20% sell on clause
dont think its a case of brilliant in Ipswichs case but more a case of already knowing what they are getting and him fitting in.
£1.5 mill isnt really that much money for a 1st team player . we have gambled that much many times on players that have done zilch for us.
Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:02 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:dogfound wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Forever Blue wrote:City Slicker wrote:We're already looking for a pacy, creative midfielder which will cost money. Another £1 million or so will help that cause nicely. I'd say bite their hand off!
If they really want to give that much money, I say the same, bite their hands off
Same here we would be mad not taking the cash. If all these teams think he is so brilliant then they won't mind paying £1.5m plus a 20% sell on clause
dont think its a case of brilliant in Ipswichs case but more a case of already knowing what they are getting and him fitting in.
£1.5 mill isnt really that much money for a 1st team player . we have gambled that much many times on players that have done zilch for us.
The 'brilliant' quote was a bit tongue in cheek as was the sell on clause but overall I agree £1.5m is not much for a first teamer and it would be nice to continue our run of selling on duffs onto other clubs rather than the recent norm of the other way around.
Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:15 am
nubbsy wrote:Annis I think too many city fans have judged him too soon. Just ask Ipswich town fans what he's worth, and Chris Coleman!
Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:11 am
Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:29 am
Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:44 am
Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:16 am
Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:22 am
llan bluebird wrote:He is a poor mans Whitts.
He is a stroller, get the ball, play a simple pass, make yourself available again , play a simple pass. He is weak in the tackle and generally languid. We just let the master leave for free !!!!!!
He is a year older than Joe Ralls (24 in sept) and played half the first team games. I would take £500k with loads of add ons and a chunk of any transfer fee in case he does discover himself.
This is all about horses for course and i just don't see him in Warnocks game plan.
Sun Jun 25, 2017 11:20 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:All this keep him, sell him business - it's all horses for courses and not if he's good enough for us.
As with Whitts it's about the system and the TYPE of player Warnock wants not if some of us think he's pretty good. I'm sure we'll sell him.
As for what he's worth - he's worth what a team want to pay. If someone on here says he's worth 500,000 but Ipswich are willing to pay 1mill then that's what he's worth to them.
Mon Jun 26, 2017 7:56 am
dogfound wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:All this keep him, sell him business - it's all horses for courses and not if he's good enough for us.
As with Whitts it's about the system and the TYPE of player Warnock wants not if some of us think he's pretty good. I'm sure we'll sell him.
As for what he's worth - he's worth what a team want to pay. If someone on here says he's worth 500,000 but Ipswich are willing to pay 1mill then that's what he's worth to them.
correct.
seems the club are for once in a strong position here with more than one club interested.
yet there are suggestions that we should ...hold out for less.??????????????
Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:54 am
Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:28 pm
Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:57 am