Blue_Barber wrote:i think they either A- will ( come end of the season) or B- its just our ownership/management teams best excuse....i can understand FFP to a point, but when your pretty much penny pinching the majority of the time then i think it just turns into an excuse.
Blueboys1927 wrote:Falling foul of FFP. Seems the idiots we have running our club such as choo choo and Del Boy Dalman always find ways of not finding money for player recruitment. Mark my words, mess Warnock around and he,ll be gone quick sharpish
Blueboys1927 wrote:Falling foul of FFP. Seems the idiots we have running our club such as choo choo and Del Boy Dalman always find ways of not finding money for player recruitment. Mark my words, mess Warnock around and he,ll be gone quick sharpish
dogfound wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:Falling foul of FFP. Seems the idiots we have running our club such as choo choo and Del Boy Dalman always find ways of not finding money for player recruitment. Mark my words, mess Warnock around and he,ll be gone quick sharpish
these other clubs everyone goes on about but never ever name?
Tony Blue Williams wrote:FFP works on a 3 year cycle with a club allowed to 'lose' £39m over that period. So in theory a club could spend heavily this season and not breach FFP until next season or even the season after or not at all if it cost cut enough to even out before the cycle ended.
As explained above it also depends on the clubs turnover (Newcastle's would obviously be much bigger than ours) and we are also writing off debt @ the rate of £8m per season or £24m over the cycle period which cuts down the amount of wriggle room we have.
Tony Blue Williams wrote:dogfound wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:Falling foul of FFP. Seems the idiots we have running our club such as choo choo and Del Boy Dalman always find ways of not finding money for player recruitment. Mark my words, mess Warnock around and he,ll be gone quick sharpish
these other clubs everyone goes on about but never ever name?
Bournemouth and Derby are 2 in recent years.
skiprat wrote:Wolves have spent £13 million on 1 player plus his and rest of the teams wages they must have a hell of a turn over to stop falling foul of the ffp rules?
wez1927 wrote:Blue_Barber wrote:i think they either A- will ( come end of the season) or B- its just our ownership/management teams best excuse....i can understand FFP to a point, but when your pretty much penny pinching the majority of the time then i think it just turns into an excuse.
The clubs spending serious money have massive crowds and much larger turnover than us
smakerzthebluebird wrote:Think people need to read the rules before commenting
The money ole spent is what's been a nouse around the clubs neck the past 2 seasons it's left us on the brink of the rules as that eases we will have leg room but not much due to debt write offs high wages and low income streams plus we have made it clear to mr tan we wanted blue and he made it clear that would come with zero investment and that means he won't overspend anymore simple as that
RICK+CCFC wrote:NW said on the 3rd Feb that City still have "commitments" to players long since gone?????
Could this be the reason why?????
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Blue_Barber wrote:i think they either A- will ( come end of the season) or B- its just our ownership/management teams best excuse....i can understand FFP to a point, but when your pretty much penny pinching the majority of the time then i think it just turns into an excuse.
The clubs spending serious money have massive crowds and much larger turnover than us
Wez, So are you saying we are not that well supported for a Championship club?
Gate money is nothing compared to a Sky money and sponsorship and good chairmen.
What's gone wrong Wez?
RICK+CCFC wrote:NW said on the 3rd Feb that City still have "commitments" to players long since gone?????
Could this be the reason why?????
nubbsy wrote:I was speaking to a Norwich fan the other day, they bought that fella for 7m and a few others, but they've made way more money on outgoings. So just looks like some of the ones we think should be in trouble have played it a bit smarter and have stuck within the rules.
nubbsy wrote:I was speaking to a Norwich fan the other day, they bought that fella for 7m and a few others, but they've made way more money on outgoings. So just looks like some of the ones we think should be in trouble have played it a bit smarter and have stuck within the rules.
dogfound wrote:nubbsy wrote:I was speaking to a Norwich fan the other day, they bought that fella for 7m and a few others, but they've made way more money on outgoings. So just looks like some of the ones we think should be in trouble have played it a bit smarter and have stuck within the rules.
its something many dont see.or in some cases deliberately close their eyes to.
Derby keep being mentioned but nowhere do the people saying Derby aknowledge they sold players too.
RICK+CCFC wrote:NW said on the 3rd Feb that City still have "commitments" to players long since gone?????
Could this be the reason why?????
Users browsing this forum: DotBot [Bot], Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Proximic [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 143 guests