Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:20 am

' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

17/02/17

Neil Warnock:
“Rickie Lambert is struggling, he’s seeing a specialist with his back next Tuesday.
“He went up to Derby but wasn’t fit enough to make the bench. It’s frustrating for both of us because Rickie needs to play to keep his fitness up.
“He hasn’t been able to train or do anything. It’s not looking good at the moment.”
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:32 pm

What would constitute an insurance claim ? This looks a career ending injury

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:09 pm

What an incredible waste of money signing Lambert has been. :banghead:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:23 pm

llan bluebird wrote:What would constitute an insurance claim ? This looks a career ending injury


City have not been able to claim as he has had problems for years on all his latest injuries.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:03 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
llan bluebird wrote:What would constitute an insurance claim ? This looks a career ending injury


City have not been able to claim as he has had problems for years on all his latest injuries.


This signing keeps looking worse and worse.

Paying an absolute fortune to an over the hill crock!

Whoever authorised this truly appalling signing needs to take a long hard look at themselves.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:10 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
llan bluebird wrote:What would constitute an insurance claim ? This looks a career ending injury


City have not been able to claim as he has had problems for years on all his latest injuries.


Exactly, you can't just decide to quit and take a big insurance pay out due to age and niggling injuries.
Insurance doesn't work like that.
Complete waste of money this guy.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:30 pm

When we signed him I said he would never get to double figures in goals scored, and would spend a lot of time out injured. Did'nt need to be Einstein to work that one out, not sure why the club were unable to make an educated guess as to what would happen. Another one who is costing the club money, while contributing very little. Not his fault I know, but why could'nt the club anticipate this. A few us on here did.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:34 pm

OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
llan bluebird wrote:What would constitute an insurance claim ? This looks a career ending injury


City have not been able to claim as he has had problems for years on all his latest injuries.


Exactly, you can't just decide to quit and take a big insurance pay out due to age and niggling injuries.
Insurance doesn't work like that.
Complete waste of money this guy.


Madness and the signing Authorised by the Committee :roll:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:46 pm

I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:51 pm

Two words, Robbie Fowler.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:59 pm

Rydogsccfc wrote:Two words, Robbie Fowler.


AND?

If you rem right, the crowds increased massively and shirts sales were a record high.

Waste of time on the pitch as past his sell by date.

Rickie Lambert, Well pst his sell by date and nothing back at all in return.

Also don't forget,we've now had 7 years of mistake,after mistake after mistake,all costly.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:03 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:08 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Rydogsccfc wrote:Two words, Robbie Fowler.


AND?

If you rem right, the crowds increased massively and shirts sales were a record high.

Waste of time on the pitch as past his sell by date.

Rickie Lambert, Well pst his sell by date and nothing back at all in return.

Also don't forget,we've now had 7 years of mistake,after mistake after mistake,all costly.

The problem with this signing is that is was so easy to predict what was going to happen. I was not the only one who posted on here to say that this would turn out to be a complete waste of money. Calculate the fee to sign him, wages to date, and goals scored and work out how much money per goal the club has spent. Could have got ourselves a couple of half decent players for the same sort of money, can't get my head around why we keep buying this type of player. Those who shrug their shoulders and say so what are usually the same ones who expect Tan to dip into his pocket and throw a few more million into the club. Not a lot of point unless we have people capable of using a bit of common sense when we buy players, no point in spending £5m and having another two or three Lamberts at the club.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:13 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:14 pm

Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Rydogsccfc wrote:Two words, Robbie Fowler.


AND?

If you rem right, the crowds increased massively and shirts sales were a record high.

Waste of time on the pitch as past his sell by date.

Rickie Lambert, Well pst his sell by date and nothing back at all in return.

Also don't forget,we've now had 7 years of mistake,after mistake after mistake,all costly.

The problem with this signing is that is was so easy to predict what was going to happen. I was not the only one who posted on here to say that this would turn out to be a complete waste of money. Calculate the fee to sign him, wages to date, and goals scored and work out how much money per goal the club has spent. Could have got ourselves a couple of half decent players for the same sort of money, can't get my head around why we keep buying this type of player. Those who shrug their shoulders and say so what are usually the same ones who expect Tan to dip into his pocket and throw a few more million into the club. Not a lot of point unless we have people capable of using a bit of common sense when we buy players, no point in spending £5m and having another two or three Lamberts at the club.


Steve, 100% agree, but in the eyes of the Tan followers it's never his fault or mistake.
Tan never seems to learn and everyone else gets blamed, Lambert and Amos were very bad,costly signings.
So far we have wasted nearly £1million on Lambert after wages,signing on fee and taxs etc.
They signed N injured player,you seriously can't make it up.
Yet Warnock a proven manager is struggling to get funds.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:16 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:20 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:

Probably wrong choice of words. Easy enough to say get over it when somebody else is forking out a lot of money each month to pay someone who is making no contribution to the team. May be one of the reasons why there was no money to bring in the extra player many were anticipating at the end of last month.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:22 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:


Signed 4 players outside of a transfer window but you claim he hasn't been backed?

Like your reply back to Steve, so many flaws in what you are saying..

No-one ever says it's not Tans fault they say he should never get the FULL blame in everything because the manager has their say as well and you can't keep playing the manager/coach has no say card every time a bad signing is made.

Trollope wanted Lambert and he was the priority signing, Tan and the board got him what he wanted.. but Trollope is gonna receive no blame on that signing in anyway?

You keep saying Warnock is struggling to get funds and be backed yet he has only been here for ONE transfer window which is incredibly inflated window in terms of prices?

Annis the matter of the fact is I do agree Tan and the board have got a lot of things wrong but you cannot continually keep letting managers at this club under Tan's stay here walk away with no blame.

We gonna hide from the Chamakh and Richardson signings? :thumbright:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:33 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Rydogsccfc wrote:Two words, Robbie Fowler.


AND?

If you rem right, the crowds increased massively and shirts sales were a record high.

Waste of time on the pitch as past his sell by date.

Rickie Lambert, Well pst his sell by date and nothing back at all in return.

Also don't forget,we've now had 7 years of mistake,after mistake after mistake,all costly.


That's football Annis mistakes are inevitable but hopefully they will make a whole lot less of them now with Warnock at the club at the time Rickie Lambert looked a good signing experienced scored goals the highest level and championship and was excited just like when Fowler came in but has turned out be a crock and needs disposing as soon as the summer arrives.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:35 pm

Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:

Probably wrong choice of words. Easy enough to say get over it when somebody else is forking out a lot of money each month to pay someone who is making no contribution to the team. May be one of the reasons why there was no money to bring in the extra player many were anticipating at the end of last month.




Steve and Dando,

Chamakh and Richardson signings?

Hardly cost us anything, they were both on very short contracts and as soon Warnock saw they were no help to his current squad he was able to move them out fast.

Let's be honest Warnock has made this club £millions just by staying in the Championship, Warnock has only made this club success and money :thumbright: :bluebird:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:39 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:

Probably wrong choice of words. Easy enough to say get over it when somebody else is forking out a lot of money each month to pay someone who is making no contribution to the team. May be one of the reasons why there was no money to bring in the extra player many were anticipating at the end of last month.




Steve and Dando,

Chamakh and Richardson signings?

Hardly cost us anything, they were both on very short contracts and as soon Warnock saw they were no help to his current squad he was able to move them out fast.

Let's be honest Warnock has made this club £millions just by staying in the Championship, Warnock has only made this club success and money :thumbright: :bluebird:


It did cost and they were pointless signings, regardless of short contracts..

I have nothing but support and belief in this club that we can achieve better things with Warnock in charge but he has made 2 bad signings himself and I believe he will get backed no doubt.. but he has only been with us through one window and we made the right choice in not bringing anyone in permanently.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:40 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:

Probably wrong choice of words. Easy enough to say get over it when somebody else is forking out a lot of money each month to pay someone who is making no contribution to the team. May be one of the reasons why there was no money to bring in the extra player many were anticipating at the end of last month.




Steve and Dando,

Chamakh and Richardson signings?

Hardly cost us anything, they were both on very short contracts and as soon Warnock saw they were no help to his current squad he was able to move them out fast.

Let's be honest Warnock has made this club £millions just by staying in the Championship, Warnock has only made this club success and money :thumbright: :bluebird:

That was a sensible way to do business. Hopefully, Warnock will be given a decent budget, and I don't think he will waste much money. Unfortunately, because of the past mistakes made by the club, that budget will probably be a lot smaller than it could have been.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:40 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


Hmmmmm who was our . Longest serving'm manager in those . Last seven years
Whisperit quietly to yourselves dont wantto upset annis .it was milky :oops: :oops: :oops:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:41 pm

Rydogsccfc wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Rydogsccfc wrote:Two words, Robbie Fowler.


AND?

If you rem right, the crowds increased massively and shirts sales were a record high.

Waste of time on the pitch as past his sell by date.

Rickie Lambert, Well pst his sell by date and nothing back at all in return.

Also don't forget,we've now had 7 years of mistake,after mistake after mistake,all costly.


That's football Annis mistakes are inevitable but hopefully they will make a whole lot less of them now with Warnock at the club at the time Rickie Lambert looked a good signing experienced scored goals the highest level and championship and was excited just like when Fowler came in but has turned out be a crock and needs disposing as soon as the summer arrives.



Ryan, Not 7years running surely.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:42 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


Hmmmmm who was our . Longest serving'm manager in those . Last seven years
Whisperit quietly to yourselves dont wantto upset annis .it was milky :oops: :oops: :oops:



And made our club a fortune and most successful in 50years a fact.

Don't forget Steve, You praised Ole even at the end Hmmmmm :lol:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:43 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Rydogsccfc wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Rydogsccfc wrote:Two words, Robbie Fowler.


AND?

If you rem right, the crowds increased massively and shirts sales were a record high.

Waste of time on the pitch as past his sell by date.

Rickie Lambert, Well pst his sell by date and nothing back at all in return.

Also don't forget,we've now had 7 years of mistake,after mistake after mistake,all costly.


That's football Annis mistakes are inevitable but hopefully they will make a whole lot less of them now with Warnock at the club at the time Rickie Lambert looked a good signing experienced scored goals the highest level and championship and was excited just like when Fowler came in but has turned out be a crock and needs disposing as soon as the summer arrives.



Ryan, Not 7years running surely.


Tan and co I feel have learnt alot from these past 7 years as we all know how inexperienced they were in the football world you've got to make mistakes in order to learn. :thumbright: :ayatollah:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:44 pm

Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:

Probably wrong choice of words. Easy enough to say get over it when somebody else is forking out a lot of money each month to pay someone who is making no contribution to the team. May be one of the reasons why there was no money to bring in the extra player many were anticipating at the end of last month.




Steve and Dando,

Chamakh and Richardson signings?

Hardly cost us anything, they were both on very short contracts and as soon Warnock saw they were no help to his current squad he was able to move them out fast.

Let's be honest Warnock has made this club £millions just by staying in the Championship, Warnock has only made this club success and money :thumbright: :bluebird:

That was a sensible way to do business. Hopefully, Warnock will be given a decent budget, and I don't think he will waste much money. Unfortunately, because of the past mistakes made by the club, that budget will probably be a lot smaller than it could have been.



Try telling Dando and Troobloo that :lol:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:57 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:

Probably wrong choice of words. Easy enough to say get over it when somebody else is forking out a lot of money each month to pay someone who is making no contribution to the team. May be one of the reasons why there was no money to bring in the extra player many were anticipating at the end of last month.




Steve and Dando,

Chamakh and Richardson signings?

Hardly cost us anything, they were both on very short contracts and as soon Warnock saw they were no help to his current squad he was able to move them out fast.

Let's be honest Warnock has made this club £millions just by staying in the Championship, Warnock has only made this club success and money :thumbright: :bluebird:

That was a sensible way to do business. Hopefully, Warnock will be given a decent budget, and I don't think he will waste much money. Unfortunately, because of the past mistakes made by the club, that budget will probably be a lot smaller than it could have been.



Try telling Dando and Troobloo that :lol:


Sensible way of doing business signing 2 players on quite a bit of wages where one of them didn't even start one game in the 2 months here? Yeah great business that.

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:07 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:

Probably wrong choice of words. Easy enough to say get over it when somebody else is forking out a lot of money each month to pay someone who is making no contribution to the team. May be one of the reasons why there was no money to bring in the extra player many were anticipating at the end of last month.




Steve and Dando,

Chamakh and Richardson signings?

Hardly cost us anything, they were both on very short contracts and as soon Warnock saw they were no help to his current squad he was able to move them out fast.

Let's be honest Warnock has made this club £millions just by staying in the Championship, Warnock has only made this club success and money :thumbright: :bluebird:

That was a sensible way to do business. Hopefully, Warnock will be given a decent budget, and I don't think he will waste much money. Unfortunately, because of the past mistakes made by the club, that budget will probably be a lot smaller than it could have been.



Try telling Dando and Troobloo that :lol:


Sensible way of doing business signing 2 players on quite a bit of wages where one of them didn't even start one game in the 2 months here? Yeah great business that.



Ok Dando, I can see you don't rate Warnock :lol:

Re: ' NOT GOOD ON RICKIE LAMBERT '

Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:09 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Steve Zodiak wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think for age it was always a risk but like most signings it's always a risk.. we have made plenty of bad signings before the current board, it happens get over it.


Famous words of Dando "get over it", You can't keep getting over loss after loss as in the end it catches up on you, common sense.

This has been going on for 7 years this is why we are in the shit we currently are and thats why when we finally get a good manager like Neil Warnock,we are struggling to back him.


How can you hold the board 100% responsible for every player that walks through the door and just assume the manager/coach has had no say in whatsoever? Trollope wanted Lambert and the board got him his man.. you can't keep pushing the whole blame on the board and let the manager/coach get away with receiving no flack.

How on earth are we struggling to back him? We gave him backing to sign 4 players outside of a transfer window period?! How many managers have been given that? Let's remember we have seen Chamakh and Richardson walk out of this club which were Warnock's signings, I have nothing against Warnock but we gonna pretend them signings were non existent and not bad signings?



Dando, Trollope was Tans manager and Tan had the final say on everything a fact, end off.

Warnock has done his job on peanuts :thumbright:

Probably wrong choice of words. Easy enough to say get over it when somebody else is forking out a lot of money each month to pay someone who is making no contribution to the team. May be one of the reasons why there was no money to bring in the extra player many were anticipating at the end of last month.




Steve and Dando,

Chamakh and Richardson signings?

Hardly cost us anything, they were both on very short contracts and as soon Warnock saw they were no help to his current squad he was able to move them out fast.

Let's be honest Warnock has made this club £millions just by staying in the Championship, Warnock has only made this club success and money :thumbright: :bluebird:

That was a sensible way to do business. Hopefully, Warnock will be given a decent budget, and I don't think he will waste much money. Unfortunately, because of the past mistakes made by the club, that budget will probably be a lot smaller than it could have been.



Try telling Dando and Troobloo that :lol:


Sensible way of doing business signing 2 players on quite a bit of wages where one of them didn't even start one game in the 2 months here? Yeah great business that.

One thing nobody can dispute is our league position on the day he arrived, and the position we are in today.