Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:28 pm
Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:32 pm
Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:37 pm
Tue Jan 17, 2017 6:34 pm
Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:57 pm
Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:42 am
DreamWelsh wrote:Badwillie
Wed Jan 18, 2017 12:00 pm
Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:10 pm
RV Casual wrote::lol:DreamWelsh wrote:Badwillie
Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:20 pm
polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:26 pm
Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:42 pm
DreamWelsh wrote:Gone are the days where you could pump a shit load of vodka down a bird then smash the guts out of her, you need to get them to sign a form these days to consent ffss
Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:51 pm
DreamWelsh wrote:Gone are the days where you could pump a shit load of vodka down a bird then smash the guts out of her, you need to get them to sign a form these days to consent ffss
Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:37 am
DreamWelsh wrote:Gone are the days where you could pump a shit load of vodka down a bird then smash the guts out of her, you need to get them to sign a form these days to consent ffss
Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:59 am
polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:19 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
If a man really feels that he did not give consent to sex because he was drunk then in law there is no reason why he can't make a compliant of rape or sexual assault.
I believe there have been a few case of where men have taken advantage of men in such circumstances.
I just wonder if you would have the same attitude if you woke up next to a bloke after a drunken night out, whether he was a minger or not?
I assume not so the principle is the same it is not how much you have had to drink which is the deciding factor it's whether you wanted to engage in sexual activity consensually.
Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:42 am
polo wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
If a man really feels that he did not give consent to sex because he was drunk then in law there is no reason why he can't make a compliant of rape or sexual assault.
I believe there have been a few case of where men have taken advantage of men in such circumstances.
I just wonder if you would have the same attitude if you woke up next to a bloke after a drunken night out, whether he was a minger or not?
I assume not so the principle is the same it is not how much you have had to drink which is the deciding factor it's whether you wanted to engage in sexual activity consensually.
Bore me later Tony
Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:42 am
DreamWelsh wrote:Gone are the days where you could pump a shit load of vodka down a bird then smash the guts out of her, you need to get them to sign a form these days to consent ffss
Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:03 pm
polo wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
If a man really feels that he did not give consent to sex because he was drunk then in law there is no reason why he can't make a compliant of rape or sexual assault.
I believe there have been a few case of where men have taken advantage of men in such circumstances.
I just wonder if you would have the same attitude if you woke up next to a bloke after a drunken night out, whether he was a minger or not?
I assume not so the principle is the same it is not how much you have had to drink which is the deciding factor it's whether you wanted to engage in sexual activity consensually.
Bore me later Tony
Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:04 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:polo wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
If a man really feels that he did not give consent to sex because he was drunk then in law there is no reason why he can't make a compliant of rape or sexual assault.
I believe there have been a few case of where men have taken advantage of men in such circumstances.
I just wonder if you would have the same attitude if you woke up next to a bloke after a drunken night out, whether he was a minger or not?
I assume not so the principle is the same it is not how much you have had to drink which is the deciding factor it's whether you wanted to engage in sexual activity consensually.
Bore me later Tony
Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:11 pm
Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:04 pm
polo wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
If a man really feels that he did not give consent to sex because he was drunk then in law there is no reason why he can't make a compliant of rape or sexual assault.
I believe there have been a few case of where men have taken advantage of men in such circumstances.
I just wonder if you would have the same attitude if you woke up next to a bloke after a drunken night out, whether he was a minger or not?
I assume not so the principle is the same it is not how much you have had to drink which is the deciding factor it's whether you wanted to engage in sexual activity consensually.
Bore me later Tony
Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:04 pm
polo wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
If a man really feels that he did not give consent to sex because he was drunk then in law there is no reason why he can't make a compliant of rape or sexual assault.
I believe there have been a few case of where men have taken advantage of men in such circumstances.
I just wonder if you would have the same attitude if you woke up next to a bloke after a drunken night out, whether he was a minger or not?
I assume not so the principle is the same it is not how much you have had to drink which is the deciding factor it's whether you wanted to engage in sexual activity consensually.
Bore me later Tony
Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:06 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:polo wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
If a man really feels that he did not give consent to sex because he was drunk then in law there is no reason why he can't make a compliant of rape or sexual assault.
I believe there have been a few case of where men have taken advantage of men in such circumstances.
I just wonder if you would have the same attitude if you woke up next to a bloke after a drunken night out, whether he was a minger or not?
I assume not so the principle is the same it is not how much you have had to drink which is the deciding factor it's whether you wanted to engage in sexual activity consensually.
Bore me later Tony
Fri Jan 20, 2017 12:50 am
polo wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:polo wrote:Goldigger. Pure and simple. Trying to sue for £500,000 originally.
In my day you woke up next to someone without fully remembering how you got there you just put it down to drunken high jinks or drunken mistake if she was a minger.
Also, how come the drunken state of the man never get taken into consideration? Seems to me women want equality only when it suits them.
If a man really feels that he did not give consent to sex because he was drunk then in law there is no reason why he can't make a compliant of rape or sexual assault.
I believe there have been a few case of where men have taken advantage of men in such circumstances.
I just wonder if you would have the same attitude if you woke up next to a bloke after a drunken night out, whether he was a minger or not?
I assume not so the principle is the same it is not how much you have had to drink which is the deciding factor it's whether you wanted to engage in sexual activity consensually.
Bore me later Tony