Scott Malone

A forum for all things Cardiff City

Scott Malone

Postby DandoCCFC » Sat Oct 15, 2016 5:46 pm

2 assists and a goal today for them.

Just have to remember when we swapped him for Richards and people thought we had a better deal getting a fraud of a footballer. :laughing6:

Been consistent for them and one of their best players by some fans on twitter.

Obviously with Bennett I feel like we got a decent left back in but my word I would have Malone back in a heartbeat as competition.

Hopefully Warnock gets rid of Richards or terminates his contract in January. :ayatollah:
I will.
And before anyone els gets in there no im not an ideot abroad

SL69.
User avatar
DandoCCFC
 
Posts: 13386
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:14 am
Location: Tredegar <O>

Scott Malone

Advertisement

Advertisement
Login or Register to remove this ad.

Re: Scott Malone

Postby Stringfellow » Sun Oct 16, 2016 8:29 am

DandoCCFC wrote:2 assists and a goal today for them.

Just have to remember when we swapped him for Richards and people thought we had a better deal getting a fraud of a footballer. :laughing6:

Been consistent for them and one of their best players by some fans on twitter.

Obviously with Bennett I feel like we got a decent left back in but my word I would have Malone back in a heartbeat as competition.

Hopefully Warnock gets rid of Richards or terminates his contract in January. :ayatollah:


Looked like 3 assists, Richards been improving and will be decent. :thumbup:
You have to go through the bad times to appreciate the good times!!!
Stringfellow
 
Posts: 4354
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:08 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby ianto13 » Sun Oct 16, 2016 9:44 am

I think Richards has played consistently well this season and can cover both full back positions. Malone plays one good game then has 10 games when he is a liability?
ianto13
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:02 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby piledriver64 » Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:10 am

Sorry but I don't see how anyone can think that Malone is as good as Richards ???

Clearly they didn't watch him play last season!!!!
piledriver64
 
Posts: 4588
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:45 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby petesmeat » Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:46 am

Malone was unfairly criticised, he was a major scapegoat last year. Richards is poor. He doesn't offer anything going forward and doesn't really install confidence defending.
petesmeat
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:02 am

Re: Scott Malone

Postby piledriver64 » Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:41 am

petesmeat wrote:Malone was unfairly criticised, he was a major scapegoat last year. Richards is poor. He doesn't offer anything going forward and doesn't really install confidence defending.


Really ?

Malone can't cross, can't tackle, lacks pace and got knocked off the ball too easily.

Richards doesn't offer enough going forward but is good in the air, distribution is excellent, strong in the air and physically strong.

Richards probably won't play in front of Peltier or Bennett but is way better than Malone.
piledriver64
 
Posts: 4588
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:45 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby gwentbluebirds » Sun Oct 16, 2016 1:33 pm

I quite liked Malone for us
gwentbluebirds
 
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 3:24 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby KBK-13 » Sun Oct 16, 2016 2:00 pm

Malone was decent for us
Richards has been decent for us
KBK-13
 
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:33 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby DandoCCFC » Sun Oct 16, 2016 4:49 pm

Malone bad crosser yet was third with most assists last season, so that's a load of crap.

Had a decent cross and scored 2/3 goals for us as well.

Richards is abysmal and don't think we won a game when he's played, horrendous full back.. no pace no nothing.

Malone only got criticism because people were obsessed and had a massive love in with Fabio and didn't like it Malone started over him, only reason people call him rubbish and all that. :sleepy2:
I will.
And before anyone els gets in there no im not an ideot abroad

SL69.
User avatar
DandoCCFC
 
Posts: 13386
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:14 am
Location: Tredegar <O>

Re: Scott Malone

Postby gwentbluebirds » Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:53 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:Malone bad crosser yet was third with most assists last season, so that's a load of crap.

Had a decent cross and scored 2/3 goals for us as well.

Richards is abysmal and don't think we won a game when he's played, horrendous full back.. no pace no nothing.

Malone only got criticism because people were obsessed and had a massive love in with Fabio and didn't like it Malone started over him, only reason people call him rubbish and all that. :sleepy2:


Agree with that
gwentbluebirds
 
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 3:24 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby Sneggyblubird » Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:00 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:2 assists and a goal today for them.

Just have to remember when we swapped him for Richards and people thought we had a better deal getting a fraud of a footballer. :laughing6:

Been consistent for them and one of their best players by some fans on twitter.

Obviously with Bennett I feel like we got a decent left back in but my word I would have Malone back in a heartbeat as competition.

Hopefully Warnock gets rid of Richards or terminates his contract in January. :ayatollah:


Don't let your anti Jack sentiment cloud your judgement.Malone couldn't buy a compliment on here not long ago.
User avatar
Sneggyblubird
 
Posts: 7498
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 11:22 am

Re: Scott Malone

Postby DandoCCFC » Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:35 pm

Sneggyblubird wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:2 assists and a goal today for them.

Just have to remember when we swapped him for Richards and people thought we had a better deal getting a fraud of a footballer. :laughing6:

Been consistent for them and one of their best players by some fans on twitter.

Obviously with Bennett I feel like we got a decent left back in but my word I would have Malone back in a heartbeat as competition.

Hopefully Warnock gets rid of Richards or terminates his contract in January. :ayatollah:


Don't let your anti Jack sentiment cloud your judgement.Malone couldn't buy a compliment on here not long ago.


Has nothing to do with him being a Jack at all, I just think if you are Welsh and play for us you can get away with anything, could run someone over and you'd have the loudest reception in the next Cardiff game when your name is announced because you are Welsh.

But Richards is a fraud of a footballer and never been first choice anywhere he's gone.. he had one great performance v Belgium and that's what he and fans live off.
I will.
And before anyone els gets in there no im not an ideot abroad

SL69.
User avatar
DandoCCFC
 
Posts: 13386
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:14 am
Location: Tredegar <O>

Re: Scott Malone

Postby skiprat » Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:35 pm

I think the pair of them are pretty much crap to be honest.
skiprat
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:31 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby GotMeSingingTheBlues » Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:56 pm

I watched 40+ games last year, Malone was shit. No guts, no bite, flatters to deceive on the ball, easily beaten on far to many occasions. If Peltier and Bennett stay as our full backs we will be solid. Richards has steadily improved and John is a positive option. Malone wouldnt get anywhere near the starting 11 if he was still here, he couldnt be less of a Warnock player if he tried. Garbage.
GotMeSingingTheBlues
 
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 11:33 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby valleyrambill » Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:37 pm

Thought Malone was a good player for us. Each to their own but since he was swapped by that great manager Trollop he is doing ok at Fulham.
[color=#0040BF][/color]
User avatar
valleyrambill
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Hengoed

Re: Scott Malone

Postby oohahhPaulMillar » Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:53 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:2 assists and a goal today for them.

Just have to remember when we swapped him for Richards and people thought we had a better deal getting a fraud of a footballer. :laughing6:

Been consistent for them and one of their best players by some fans on twitter.

Obviously with Bennett I feel like we got a decent left back in but my word I would have Malone back in a heartbeat as competition.

Hopefully Warnock gets rid of Richards or terminates his contract in January. :ayatollah:


Is this the Malone who shit out of every 50/50 tackle and was caught out of position so many times it was untrue??? Or are we talking about some other Malone because I remember Scott Malone to be garbage!!!
oohahhPaulMillar
 
Posts: 2626
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:18 am

Re: Scott Malone

Postby 116 city fan! » Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:31 pm

Malone was old Cardiff, ducking tackles, falling over, gesturing to refs for non fouls.
Warnock Cardiff play with guts and passion, and get stuck in!

Joe Bennett turned as Bristol scored, a bit of a chicken. Richards would have jumped in.
No place in our team for shifters or frauds. I pay to see passion and fire, win, lose or draw, that's how we do it!!
116 city fan!
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 12:44 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby 116 city fan! » Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:32 pm

Malone was old Cardiff, ducking tackles, falling over, gesturing to refs for non fouls.
Warnock Cardiff play with guts and passion, and get stuck in!

Joe Bennett turned as Bristol scored, a bit of a chicken. Richards would have jumped in.
No place in our team for shifters or frauds. I pay to see passion and fire, win, lose or draw, that's how we do it!!
116 city fan!
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 12:44 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby TopCat CCFC » Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:49 pm

Dortmund were interested ;)
User avatar
TopCat CCFC
Moderator
 
Posts: 24976
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Scott Malone

Postby paulh_85 » Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:57 am

Malone > Richards by an absolute mile
User avatar
paulh_85
 
Posts: 12129
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 5:20 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby BlakeCCFC » Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:23 am

Malone was one of the worst defenders i've seen down City in a long time. He could get away with being a left midfielder as he isn't bad going forward. But defensively, he cost us week in week out
Port Talbot Bluebirds
User avatar
BlakeCCFC
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:55 am

Re: Scott Malone

Postby Tonteg Bluebird » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:51 pm

Malone gave away 2 penalties tonight. He will always be a full back who can't defend. I love it when people make a knee jerk post based on one game. :laughing6:
Tonteg Bluebird
 
Posts: 6800
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 5:26 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby TopCat CCFC » Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:06 pm

Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Malone gave away 2 penalties tonight. He will always be a full back who can't defend. I love it when people make a knee jerk post based on one game. :laughing6:


Dortmund still interested ;)
User avatar
TopCat CCFC
Moderator
 
Posts: 24976
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Scott Malone

Postby bluemun » Wed Oct 19, 2016 12:06 pm

Bennett and Richardson both much better players. I'd love to back younger Welsh players, but realistically Huws, John and Richards will be struggling even to be subs now.
bluemun
 
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 8:16 am

Re: Scott Malone

Postby DandoCCFC » Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:42 pm

Fulham got the better deal, Richards is bang average and is not championship standard.
I will.
And before anyone els gets in there no im not an ideot abroad

SL69.
User avatar
DandoCCFC
 
Posts: 13386
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:14 am
Location: Tredegar <O>

Re: Scott Malone

Postby SwampCCFC » Fri Oct 21, 2016 5:55 pm

piledriver64 wrote:
petesmeat wrote:Malone was unfairly criticised, he was a major scapegoat last year. Richards is poor. He doesn't offer anything going forward and doesn't really install confidence defending.


Really ?

Malone can't cross, can't tackle, lacks pace and got knocked off the ball too easily.

Richards doesn't offer enough going forward but is good in the air, distribution is excellent, strong in the air and physically strong.

Richards probably won't play in front of Peltier or Bennett but is way better than Malone.


this.
User avatar
SwampCCFC
 
Posts: 1441
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:31 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby DandoCCFC » Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:58 pm

He is not better than Malone, he's never been first choice anywhere and is a fraud of a footballer.
I will.
And before anyone els gets in there no im not an ideot abroad

SL69.
User avatar
DandoCCFC
 
Posts: 13386
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:14 am
Location: Tredegar <O>

Re: Scott Malone

Postby GotMeSingingTheBlues » Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:46 am

DandoCCFC wrote:He is not better than Malone, he's never been first choice anywhere and is a fraud of a footballer.


:laughing6: Fraud of a footballer, has he nailed someone in your family because he's seem to have really pissed you off somehow. The kids not a bad footballer, I've seen a lot worst full backs down the city down the years.
GotMeSingingTheBlues
 
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 11:33 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby DreamWelsh » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:43 am

Garbage well rid.
DreamWelsh
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Scott Malone

Postby DandoCCFC » Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:48 pm

People with the criticism of Malone can you get the posters of Fabio off your walls, laughable because people disliked him purely based on a Fabio love in. :lol:

I just think Richards is a liability of a full back and adds nothing, he hasn't even been part of a team that has won a game this season for us has he? Rotherham he may have played off the bench or something not sure but he needs a termination of his contract.
I will.
And before anyone els gets in there no im not an ideot abroad

SL69.
User avatar
DandoCCFC
 
Posts: 13386
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:14 am
Location: Tredegar <O>



Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bakedalasker, Bytespider [Bot], DotBot [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Iceblue, MOZZER1, Proximic [Bot], TheHangedMan and 203 guests

Disclaimer :
The views and comments entered in these forums are personal and are not necessarily those of the management of this board.
The management of this board is not responsible for the content of any external internet sites.