Page 1 of 1

Madness

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:30 pm
by stuey1965
It's sheer madness when people post that it's good business for the club when we are selling our best players! It would only be good business if every penny was reinvested instead of lining tans pockets. I now fear the very worst for us, I really would love to see new owners and soon

Re: Madness

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:36 pm
by cityinmyblood
We're heading towards league 1 we won't buy anyone just sell our best players

Re: Madness

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:37 pm
by lyndipops
I get what your saying but I think you should reserve judgement till after the window closes. He hasnt had a chance to put any back yet. I think he would be daft not to, it would be basically cutting his nose off to spite his face.

Re: Madness

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:44 pm
by jimmy_rat
I would hands down sell a GK for a few million and spend it on a striker. GK much easier to replace. We haven't had a good striker since... Oh shit... When?

Re: Madness

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:09 pm
by wiltshirebluebird
Tan lining his pockets. What baloney. Think what you may about the man, but without his millions we would have been out of business several years ago.
I see no queue forming to buy us.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 7:49 am
by nojac
We are stuck with Tan and he's stuck with us.
We have choices , but Tan hasn't he either loses much more money or tries to balance the books and maybe break even , a long way in the future.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:02 pm
by griff105
It's one step beyond.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:24 pm
by OriginalGrangeEndBlue
It's certainly not The House Of Fun.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:38 pm
by TopCat CCFC
stuey1965 wrote:It's sheer madness when people post that it's good business for the club when we are selling our best players! It would only be good business if every penny was reinvested instead of lining tans pockets. I now fear the very worst for us, I really would love to see new owners and soon


Madness - when you get rid of 2 keepers before hand - Now that's an " EMBARRASSMENT " :roll:

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:47 pm
by GrangeEndStar
When I heard the news on the radio, I was so furious that I had to pull over, as I Was Driving In My Car.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:52 pm
by since64
Please explain how a keeper is easier to replace than a striker

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:54 pm
by Scandinavianbluebird
TopCat CCFC wrote:
stuey1965 wrote:It's sheer madness when people post that it's good business for the club when we are selling our best players! It would only be good business if every penny was reinvested instead of lining tans pockets. I now fear the very worst for us, I really would love to see new owners and soon


Madness - when you get rid of 2 keepers before hand - Now that's an " EMBARRASSMENT " :roll:

How about setting your team up preseason and going for 3-5-2, and sell your two wing backs?

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:54 pm
by Dessy1927
GrangeEndStar wrote:When I heard the news on the radio, I was so furious that I had to pull over, as I Was Driving In My Car.


Never cease to disappoint squire hahaha

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:14 pm
by GrangeEndStar
Dessy1927 wrote:
GrangeEndStar wrote:When I heard the news on the radio, I was so furious that I had to pull over, as I Was Driving In My Car.


Never cease to disappoint squire hahaha


As I was so angry, I decided to drive straight back home but the red mist resulted in me accidentally driving into the side of Our House. Taxi.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:15 pm
by TopCat CCFC
jimmy_rat wrote:I would hands down sell a GK for a few million and spend it on a striker. GK much easier to replace. We haven't had a good striker since... Oh shit... When?


CHOPS - MACCA - ANO :lol:

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:17 pm
by GrangeEndStar
Please note that any reply on this thread that doesn't include specific reference to Madness would be Bad Manners.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:22 pm
by sid61284
stuey1965 wrote:It's sheer madness when people post that it's good business for the club when we are selling our best players! It would only be good business if every penny was reinvested instead of lining tans pockets. I now fear the very worst for us, I really would love to see new owners and soon


Explain to me how the money is lining tans pockets?

You really think the cost of your match ticket is keeping this club going?

The club is in debt, not enough money coming in to cover wages, that's why high earners must leave and any reasonable transfer offer accepted

Re: Madness

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 11:01 pm
by Welsh Exile
GrangeEndStar wrote:Please note that any reply on this thread that doesn't include specific reference to Madness would be Bad Manners.

Might of got yourself into a bit of a Jam there fella.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:27 am
by GrangeEndStar
Welsh Exile wrote:
GrangeEndStar wrote:Please note that any reply on this thread that doesn't include specific reference to Madness would be Bad Manners.

Might of got yourself into a bit of a Jam there fella.


Your probably right but I'm not going to Beat myself up too much about it as it might result in a Ska.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 6:05 am
by griff105
This thread needs a bang on the head with a plastic cup.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 7:16 am
by Welsh Exile
griff105 wrote:This thread needs a bang on the head with a plastic cup.

Hey it's just 3 boys having some fun (cryptic that one) or simply put its Men at work.

Re: Madness

Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 10:29 am
by griff105
Welsh Exile wrote:
griff105 wrote:This thread needs a bang on the head with a plastic cup.

Hey it's just 3 boys having some fun (cryptic that one) or simply put its Men at work.


You cant put fun boy 3 in a madness thread!!!! :o :o :o

Thats just Bad Manners. Have you been on the Special Brew?

Re: Madness

Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:28 pm
by GrangeEndStar
Selling Marshall was anything but 'good business' but I don't blame Trollope for this, as he obviously wasn't The Selector.