Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:20 am
Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:27 am
Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:43 am
Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:52 am
Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:28 am
Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:37 am
Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:54 am
buckleys brewery wrote:Lie after lie after lie, and the suckers fell for it. Fact.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:19 am
buckleys brewery wrote:Lie after lie after lie, and the suckers fell for it. Fact.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:26 am
Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:29 am
buckleys brewery wrote:Lie after lie after lie, and the suckers fell for it. Fact.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:32 am
Cardiffcitymad wrote:There will be no second referendum Cameron has already stated this
Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:55 am
Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:03 pm
pembroke allan wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:Lie after lie after lie, and the suckers fell for it. Fact.
Yes camaron and his cronies lied through back teeth to persuade people to vote stay in !!!
1. We aren't going to see a fall in immigration levels
No one in the Leave campaign actually gave any target figures, at any time, ever. Conservative MEP Dan Hannan has already said this morning that people expecting immigration to come down will be "disappointed".
2. We aren't going to have an extra £100 million a week for the NHS
Nigel Farage has already told reporters today that the Leave campaign shouldn't have claimed that.
3. We aren't going to be able to stay in the single market
No other country has a set up like that: both France and Germany have made it abundantly clear that we are not going to be able to have our cake and eat it, ie, take advantage of the free-trade zone without contributing a single penny to it, as Leave says we will.
4. We aren't going to get our sovereignty back
Looks like we're going to get a new prime minister by the end of the autumn Conservative party conference. It'll be a short list of two people, nominated by MPs.
This unelected leader could then theoretically hold office unopposed until a general election has to be called in three year's time.
P.S. We still have the House of Lords. So there's that.
5. We aren't going to save £350m a week
The Leave claim that the UK gives £350m a week to the EU has been thoroughly debunked. But it was still emblazoned on their battle bus right up until the end:
6. We won't remain a world leader in research and development
UK investment in science and universities has dried up since the recession, whereas the EU gave us £7bn in science funding alone between 2007 - 2013.
We're also going to face new barriers to collaboration with European universities and research centres.
7. We aren't going to save £2bn on energy bills
Leave promised we could end VAT on household energy bills. While that's possible, it won't save us any money in reality because we rely on imports for so much of our energy.
Because the pound has fallen, inflation will go up, which means imports and thus our domestic energy bills will cost up to 12 per cent more than they currently do.
8. We aren't going to be a 'greater' Britain
Overnight the UK economy has already slumped from the fifth largest in the world to sixth.
More than £200 billion has already been wiped from the value of the UK stock market - or put another way, 24 years' worth of UK contributions to the EU.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:13 pm
Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:19 pm
Owain wrote:pembroke allan wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:Lie after lie after lie, and the suckers fell for it. Fact.
Yes camaron and his cronies lied through back teeth to persuade people to vote stay in !!!
What by saying that it would shock the world economy (which it has), damage the UK currency and stock markets (which is most definitely has) and may well result in a recession (quite likely given recent developments).
It's much easier to pick out massive lies from the out camp than the remain camp. Mainly around immigration falling, and £350m to be spent on the NHS!
This is a good summary:1. We aren't going to see a fall in immigration levels
No one in the Leave campaign actually gave any target figures, at any time, ever. Conservative MEP Dan Hannan has already said this morning that people expecting immigration to come down will be "disappointed".
2. We aren't going to have an extra £100 million a week for the NHS
Nigel Farage has already told reporters today that the Leave campaign shouldn't have claimed that.
3. We aren't going to be able to stay in the single market
No other country has a set up like that: both France and Germany have made it abundantly clear that we are not going to be able to have our cake and eat it, ie, take advantage of the free-trade zone without contributing a single penny to it, as Leave says we will.
4. We aren't going to get our sovereignty back
Looks like we're going to get a new prime minister by the end of the autumn Conservative party conference. It'll be a short list of two people, nominated by MPs.
This unelected leader could then theoretically hold office unopposed until a general election has to be called in three year's time.
P.S. We still have the House of Lords. So there's that.
5. We aren't going to save £350m a week
The Leave claim that the UK gives £350m a week to the EU has been thoroughly debunked. But it was still emblazoned on their battle bus right up until the end:
6. We won't remain a world leader in research and development
UK investment in science and universities has dried up since the recession, whereas the EU gave us £7bn in science funding alone between 2007 - 2013.
We're also going to face new barriers to collaboration with European universities and research centres.
7. We aren't going to save £2bn on energy bills
Leave promised we could end VAT on household energy bills. While that's possible, it won't save us any money in reality because we rely on imports for so much of our energy.
Because the pound has fallen, inflation will go up, which means imports and thus our domestic energy bills will cost up to 12 per cent more than they currently do.
8. We aren't going to be a 'greater' Britain
Overnight the UK economy has already slumped from the fifth largest in the world to sixth.
More than £200 billion has already been wiped from the value of the UK stock market - or put another way, 24 years' worth of UK contributions to the EU.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:21 pm
bridgendbluebird30 wrote:Signed. Do we live in a democratic society? Yes. So why have so many of those that did not get their wishes oppose the majority of the publics wishes? Next time a particular government is elected should we challenge it? Of course not.
Perhaps times are changing and many have no values anymore. I suspect without a democratic society the country would be in turmoil. Perhaps the remainers will get their wishes in the 10th referendum and then they will stop throwing tantrums.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:59 pm
Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:13 pm
wayne wrote:so far 720 have sign the petition , while the other petition is over 4 million
Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:25 pm
wez1927 wrote:wayne wrote:so far 720 have sign the petition , while the other petition is over 4 million
this petition is less than 24hours old the other one is 4 months old and has millions of people from overseas signing it the two can't be compared yet
Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:34 pm
Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:39 pm
wez1927 wrote:https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/134345
if you believe in democracy then sign this petition
Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:44 pm
Sven wrote:wez1927 wrote:https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/134345
if you believe in democracy then sign this petition
Absolutely disgraceful that some people spout democracy so long as it goes in their favour and then bleat like goats as soon as it doesn't!
I really don't believe the 'Brexit' people would have reacted the same had it gone the other way!
Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:45 pm
Sven wrote:wez1927 wrote:https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/134345
if you believe in democracy then sign this petition
Absolutely disgraceful that some people spout democracy so long as it goes in their favour and then bleat like goats as soon as it doesn't!
I really don't believe the 'Brexit' people would have reacted the same had it gone the other way!
Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:50 pm
Owain wrote:There shouldn't be a second referendum asking the same question, but once some form of agreement is reached there should be a vote (either by way of a general election, or a referendum) for the people to decide whether they are happy with it.
There's no way we are going to fully exit the EU, exit the free market and close our borders. Whether brexiters like it or not, there is going to be some form of compromise.
The messy part is that some people who voted out did it because of 'foreigners coming over here taking our jobs', some because they don't want the EU telling us what to do, and other because of the cost of membership. Many were obviously a combination.
I would imagine in the end we will end up in a situation where we exit the EU, but end up with a similar deal to Norway where we are still in the single market (which includes the free movement of goods, services and people). Personally I think that would be a preferable result, but I'm sure many (like Farage) will still be upset. The downside of the Norway/Switzerland model is that they still have to contribute to EU budget, and we'd still have to adhere to some EU regulation without having a say in how it's run.
I really don't know how it's going to pan out, but I can't see what favourable options we've got. Luckily it seems as if as suspected Boris isn't really an 'outer' in the same vein as Farage, as decided to join the leave camp to further his own career. If he gets PM I think we will end up with a form of agreement that sees us remain in the single market.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:55 pm
Owain wrote:Sven wrote:wez1927 wrote:https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/134345
if you believe in democracy then sign this petition
Absolutely disgraceful that some people spout democracy so long as it goes in their favour and then bleat like goats as soon as it doesn't!
I really don't believe the 'Brexit' people would have reacted the same had it gone the other way!
Farage said that if it was a close remain win it would not be the end, and he would carry on his campaign. Additionally, the main petition was srarted by an out voter that thought he would lose.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:57 pm
Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:09 pm
Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:11 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Owain wrote:There shouldn't be a second referendum asking the same question, but once some form of agreement is reached there should be a vote (either by way of a general election, or a referendum) for the people to decide whether they are happy with it.
There's no way we are going to fully exit the EU, exit the free market and close our borders. Whether brexiters like it or not, there is going to be some form of compromise.
The messy part is that some people who voted out did it because of 'foreigners coming over here taking our jobs', some because they don't want the EU telling us what to do, and other because of the cost of membership. Many were obviously a combination.
I would imagine in the end we will end up in a situation where we exit the EU, but end up with a similar deal to Norway where we are still in the single market (which includes the free movement of goods, services and people). Personally I think that would be a preferable result, but I'm sure many (like Farage) will still be upset. The downside of the Norway/Switzerland model is that they still have to contribute to EU budget, and we'd still have to adhere to some EU regulation without having a say in how it's run.
I really don't know how it's going to pan out, but I can't see what favourable options we've got. Luckily it seems as if as suspected Boris isn't really an 'outer' in the same vein as Farage, as decided to join the leave camp to further his own career. If he gets PM I think we will end up with a form of agreement that sees us remain in the single market.
I agree I don't think there will be a full exit, however, we will get a different deal to either Norway or Switzerland.
The EU have reasonably stated that we cannot expect the full benefit's of the single market without paying towards it's cost. On the other hand the UK is a massive market for EU exports and we could contribute far more than either of those 2 countries.
Any deal which involves free movement of labour will be killed off at birth, because Cameron has already reported to the EU that the main reason for the leave vote was uncontrolled migration. I think we will end up paying a sizable membership fee (anything up to £9billion) but in return we will have full control on migration.
I would be unhappy because we would be still contributing to the Brussels gravy train but that apart I could live with the above arrangement.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:21 pm
Owain wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Owain wrote:There shouldn't be a second referendum asking the same question, but once some form of agreement is reached there should be a vote (either by way of a general election, or a referendum) for the people to decide whether they are happy with it.
There's no way we are going to fully exit the EU, exit the free market and close our borders. Whether brexiters like it or not, there is going to be some form of compromise.
The messy part is that some people who voted out did it because of 'foreigners coming over here taking our jobs', some because they don't want the EU telling us what to do, and other because of the cost of membership. Many were obviously a combination.
I would imagine in the end we will end up in a situation where we exit the EU, but end up with a similar deal to Norway where we are still in the single market (which includes the free movement of goods, services and people). Personally I think that would be a preferable result, but I'm sure many (like Farage) will still be upset. The downside of the Norway/Switzerland model is that they still have to contribute to EU budget, and we'd still have to adhere to some EU regulation without having a say in how it's run.
I really don't know how it's going to pan out, but I can't see what favourable options we've got. Luckily it seems as if as suspected Boris isn't really an 'outer' in the same vein as Farage, as decided to join the leave camp to further his own career. If he gets PM I think we will end up with a form of agreement that sees us remain in the single market.
I agree I don't think there will be a full exit, however, we will get a different deal to either Norway or Switzerland.
The EU have reasonably stated that we cannot expect the full benefit's of the single market without paying towards it's cost. On the other hand the UK is a massive market for EU exports and we could contribute far more than either of those 2 countries.
Any deal which involves free movement of labour will be killed off at birth, because Cameron has already reported to the EU that the main reason for the leave vote was uncontrolled migration. I think we will end up paying a sizable membership fee (anything up to £9billion) but in return we will have full control on migration.
I would be unhappy because we would be still contributing to the Brussels gravy train but that apart I could live with the above arrangement.
Tricky one. Boris' speech was very different, and suggested that immigration wasn't a key factor. If Boris is PM i can see us ss
staying in the single market.
Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:27 pm
Owain wrote:There shouldn't be a second referendum asking the same question, but once some form of agreement is reached there should be a vote (either by way of a general election, or a referendum) for the people to decide whether they are happy with it.
There's no way we are going to fully exit the EU, exit the free market and close our borders. Whether brexiters like it or not, there is going to be some form of compromise.
The messy part is that some people who voted out did it because of 'foreigners coming over here taking our jobs', some because they don't want the EU telling us what to do, and other because of the cost of membership. Many were obviously a combination.
I would imagine in the end we will end up in a situation where we exit the EU, but end up with a similar deal to Norway where we are still in the single market (which includes the free movement of goods, services and people). Personally I think that would be a preferable result, but I'm sure many (like Farage) will still be upset. The downside of the Norway/Switzerland model is that they still have to contribute to EU budget, and we'd still have to adhere to some EU regulation without having a say in how it's run.
I really don't know how it's going to pan out, but I can't see what favourable options we've got. Luckily it seems as if as suspected Boris isn't really an 'outer' in the same vein as Farage, as decided to join the leave camp to further his own career. If he gets PM I think we will end up with a form of agreement that sees us remain in the single market.