Many managers have a clause in their contracts that....

they are entitlied to a percentage of sell-on fees for players they bring in and then move on (according to Harry Redknapp). So it got me thinking if Russell Slade who is reported to be one of the cheapest managers in this league would he have a similar
agreement in place to help improve his income because the amount of cheap players he's brought in but unfortunately for him haven't worked out seems higher than previous managers.

Just a thought

how many have been moved on though? so if you are insinuating that hes doing it for an extra bit of money (thats how your post comes across) he wouldnt have currently got anything

how many have been moved on though? so if you are insinuating that hes doing it for an extra bit of money (thats how your post comes across) he wouldnt have currently got anything

well you wouldn't know how good they are until you get them in would you!!! That's the gamble you take with players surely

Makes sense. Only takes one or a few to hit it off and he's quids in. Look at the players Southampton brought through all at once and other clubs have done it before them like Man United and so forth. I wouldn't be surprised if this is true Brownie tbf.

Feasible Adam.

I wonder if Dave Jones got something for Michael Chopra?

should put that clause in for youngsters they bring through and sell on. might actually see our academy boys then

they are entitlied to a percentage of sell-on fees for players they bring in and then move on (according to Harry Redknapp). So it got me thinking if Russell Slade who is reported to be one of the cheapest managers in this league would he have a similar
agreement in place to help improve his income because the amount of cheap players he's brought in but unfortunately for him haven't worked out seems higher than previous managers.

Just a thought

Shame there is no clause working the other way as MM and Ole would owe the club more than a few bob considering their terrible transfer activity.

they are entitlied to a percentage of sell-on fees for players they bring in and then move on (according to Harry Redknapp). So it got me thinking if Russell Slade who is reported to be one of the cheapest managers in this league would he have a similar
agreement in place to help improve his income because the amount of cheap players he's brought in but unfortunately for him haven't worked out seems higher than previous managers.

Just a thought

that makes sense ...a bit of a bonus for cutting the wage bill.

Presumably he would also have a bonus for position in the league ? You would hope so, otherwise he could sell the lot !

The best transfer Redknapp benefited from was when Lassana Diarra was sold by Pompey to Real Madrid for £18.8 million who he brought from Arsenal for £5 million.

Following on from this is the real reason why so many players are going out on loan is really about getting the players permenant deals with the clubs so that even if a profit of £50k 'could' still make Slade 10% of that ?