Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:25 pm
Stringfellow wrote:Asset stripping selling any player with any value and looking to build a leauge one team, it's starting to look like a lot of people were very wrong.
Try - balancing the books, holding on to our best players who have the correct attitude and building a decent team without throwing money away and making better footballing decisions.
The club has endured a lot of criticism and rightly so, it now deserves some credit because it's clear the intention is anything but a lot of things suggested.
Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:26 pm
bang onStringfellow wrote:Asset stripping selling any player with any value and looking to build a leauge one team, it's starting to look like a lot of people were very wrong.
Try - balancing the books, holding on to our best players who have the correct attitude and building a decent team without throwing money away and making better footballing decisions.
The club has endured a lot of criticism and rightly so, it now deserves some credit because it's clear the intention is anything but a lot of things suggested.
Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:27 pm
Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:45 pm
Stringfellow wrote:Asset stripping selling any player with any value and looking to build a leauge one team, it's starting to look like a lot of people were very wrong.
Try - balancing the books, holding on to our best players who have the correct attitude and building a decent team without throwing money away and making better footballing decisions.
The club has endured a lot of criticism and rightly so, it now deserves some credit because it's clear the intention is anything but a lot of things suggested.
Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:54 pm
Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:55 pm
Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:58 pm
Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:59 pm
Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:05 pm
wez1927 wrote:Have Leeds signed noone ?
Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:14 pm
Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:17 pm
Lawnmower wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Who knows ?
No offence Annis, but you can't be privy to every conversation Tan, Choo , Slade and Dalman have with other clubs.
Irrespective City (Tan) had wanted to sell then they could easil have alerted other clubs and got deals done.
One exception - I think we might have been lucky with the timing of Manga's injury.
It's just nice NOT to see us selling the Crown Jewels for whatever we could get as so often happened in the past
That in itself is great to see.
Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:23 pm
Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:31 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Lawnmower wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Who knows ?
No offence Annis, but you can't be privy to every conversation Tan, Choo , Slade and Dalman have with other clubs.
Irrespective City (Tan) had wanted to sell then they could easil have alerted other clubs and got deals done.
One exception - I think we might have been lucky with the timing of Manga's injury.
It's just nice NOT to see us selling the Crown Jewels for whatever we could get as so often happened in the past
That in itself is great to see.
Tim,Very true,but I was kept up to date on any real bids
Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:47 pm
Stringfellow wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Lawnmower wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Who knows ?
No offence Annis, but you can't be privy to every conversation Tan, Choo , Slade and Dalman have with other clubs.
Irrespective City (Tan) had wanted to sell then they could easil have alerted other clubs and got deals done.
One exception - I think we might have been lucky with the timing of Manga's injury.
It's just nice NOT to see us selling the Crown Jewels for whatever we could get as so often happened in the past
That in itself is great to see.
Tim,Very true,but I was kept up to date on any real bids
I agree if we wanted to sell we would have put them out there, a lot of water has passed under the bridge, to much water for some but is it no coincidence when we have made ( small steps) off the field then things have improved on them. Can't wait for the next match, that was rare last season
Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:49 pm
Stringfellow wrote:Asset stripping selling any player with any value and looking to build a leauge one team, it's starting to look like a lot of people were very wrong.
Try - balancing the books, holding on to our best players who have the correct attitude and building a decent team without throwing money away and making better footballing decisions.
The club has endured a lot of criticism and rightly so, it now deserves some credit because it's clear the intention is anything but a lot of things suggested.
Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:52 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Lawnmower wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Who knows ?
No offence Annis, but you can't be privy to every conversation Tan, Choo , Slade and Dalman have with other clubs.
Irrespective City (Tan) had wanted to sell then they could easil have alerted other clubs and got deals done.
One exception - I think we might have been lucky with the timing of Manga's injury.
It's just nice NOT to see us selling the Crown Jewels for whatever we could get as so often happened in the past
That in itself is great to see.
Tim,Very true,but I was kept up to date on any real bids
Tue Sep 01, 2015 8:52 pm
Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Tue Sep 01, 2015 9:29 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Do you think that the start to the season has made tan think that we can get promotion and premier league football is the best way to get his money back?
Wed Sep 02, 2015 1:41 am
Stringfellow wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Do you think that the start to the season has made tan think that we can get promotion and premier league football is the best way to get his money back?
100% no doubt about it, have posted on this. He knew this before but even though it's early I think he can see it is not impossible but more difficult if he sold these players.
Wed Sep 02, 2015 6:45 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Stringfellow wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Do you think that the start to the season has made tan think that we can get promotion and premier league football is the best way to get his money back?
100% no doubt about it, have posted on this. He knew this before but even though it's early I think he can see it is not impossible but more difficult if he sold these players.
If we had received a bid for £5m for Marshall he would not be here regardless of the start we had.
Same with Jones had someone offered him the same wages he is already on.
However the start we have had is a comfort to Tan so he wont lose any sleep over not receiving the right bid for Marshall.
Wed Sep 02, 2015 6:48 am
Wed Sep 02, 2015 6:52 am
Steve Zodiak wrote:I would have thought to sell anything or anyone you need to firstly have a buyer who is prepared to pay the asking price. If the rumours are correct, with the exception of Marshall no-one wanted to buy any of our other players. I have no idea what happened with the Marshall/WBA situation, but I'm glad it fell through because there are not many goalkeepers of his quality playing outside of the Premier League. I should think keeping Marshall and Jones here will result in us being at least 10 points better off at the end of the season than we may have been if they had been sold.
Wed Sep 02, 2015 7:41 am
Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Wed Sep 02, 2015 10:25 am
troobloo3339 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
So Annis what does that mean ,are you trying to say if there had been more bids we would have excepted them ,does not the refusal of w.b.a. Offer for Marshall not prove anything in your world of negativity
Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:04 am
Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:44 am
Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:39 pm
Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:43 pm
SwampCCFC wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
and the marshall bid was never really at an appropriate level.
if we have saleable players they would have gone, we had an average season and with most of our squad on wages above their performance / ability, other clubs aren't going to be interested in paying decent money for them.
its clear that the number one priority is balancing the books whilst hoping for promotion, as opposed to genuine ambition.
Wed Sep 02, 2015 6:19 pm
Forever Blue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:There were NO proper bids for City players other than Marshall a fact.
So Annis what does that mean ,are you trying to say if there had been more bids we would have excepted them ,does not the refusal of w.b.a. Offer for Marshall not prove anything in your world of negativity
Steve, Me negative,when we beat Forest I walked past u happy and all u did was moan and then come on here and have a go at our fans.
Time to unite as fans and support our players