Sat Aug 01, 2015 5:05 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 5:15 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 5:19 pm
He Plays on the Wright wrote:We don't really need any more players imo but if Marshall does go then a sum of that money should be used to replace him.
Sat Aug 01, 2015 5:26 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 5:46 pm
He Plays on the Wright wrote:We don't really need any more players imo but if Marshall does go then a sum of that money should be used to replace him.
Sat Aug 01, 2015 6:10 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 6:13 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 6:26 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 6:30 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 6:39 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 7:34 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 7:39 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:It was CLEARLY stated if we went back blue investment would stop like it was before, the same way before we went red then he threatened to pull the investment because of the so called fuss and then changed his mind and went red anyway. I've no idea why people are moaning online. This was always going to happen the day we went down from the premier league. Even my 11 year old lad knows tan is getting what ever money he can from within the club and will continue to do so
Sat Aug 01, 2015 7:43 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 7:53 pm
carlccfc wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:It was CLEARLY stated if we went back blue investment would stop like it was before, the same way before we went red then he threatened to pull the investment because of the so called fuss and then changed his mind and went red anyway. I've no idea why people are moaning online. This was always going to happen the day we went down from the premier league. Even my 11 year old lad knows tan is getting what ever money he can from within the club and will continue to do so
Ian, not be funny but when was this stated ?
I don't recall ever a condition being put on us going back to blue meant no money being spent.
Money had certainly been stopped but that was before the return to blue happened.
Sat Aug 01, 2015 7:56 pm
carlccfc wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:It was CLEARLY stated if we went back blue investment would stop like it was before, the same way before we went red then he threatened to pull the investment because of the so called fuss and then changed his mind and went red anyway. I've no idea why people are moaning online. This was always going to happen the day we went down from the premier league. Even my 11 year old lad knows tan is getting what ever money he can from within the club and will continue to do so
Ian, not be funny but when was this stated ?
I don't recall ever a condition being put on us going back to blue meant no money being spent.
Money had certainly been stopped but that was before the return to blue happened.
Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:02 pm
bluebird58 wrote:Didn't we always know this? That players had to go before others could be brought in?
And people on here don't realise the expenses involved in running a squad in the Premier League? Parachute payments are there to fund you and prevent you going out of business, not to finance another promotion campaign? The stupid negative people on here really piss me off.
Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:04 pm
bridgendbluebird30 wrote:bluebird58 wrote:Didn't we always know this? That players had to go before others could be brought in?
And people on here don't realise the expenses involved in running a squad in the Premier League? Parachute payments are there to fund you and prevent you going out of business, not to finance another promotion campaign? The stupid negative people on here really piss me off.
So it's showing ambition not to sell a penny of your parachute payments or income from player sales? There's a need of having a happy balance of strengthening the squad to push on and reducing the debt at the same time. At the moment the club are selling all of the quality in the squad and bringing in bargain basement players. We are not in the Premier League, we are in the Championship. Everyone wants to be positive and see the club progress but at the moment all that seems to being built is a League 1 team.
If Slade does well then that would be great but based on last years performances & if we have 4/5 points from the first 6 games would you be happy?
Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:05 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:07 pm
llangainbluebird wrote:All depends if Marshall wants to go.
Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:11 pm
bluebird58 wrote:bridgendbluebird30 wrote:bluebird58 wrote:Didn't we always know this? That players had to go before others could be brought in?
And people on here don't realise the expenses involved in running a squad in the Premier League? Parachute payments are there to fund you and prevent you going out of business, not to finance another promotion campaign? The stupid negative people on here really piss me off.
So it's showing ambition not to sell a penny of your parachute payments or income from player sales? There's a need of having a happy balance of strengthening the squad to push on and reducing the debt at the same time. At the moment the club are selling all of the quality in the squad and bringing in bargain basement players. We are not in the Premier League, we are in the Championship. Everyone wants to be positive and see the club progress but at the moment all that seems to being built is a League 1 team.
If Slade does well then that would be great but based on last years performances & if we have 4/5 points from the first 6 games would you be happy?
You're a glass half empty person, aren't you?
Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:42 pm
bridgendbluebird30 wrote:bluebird58 wrote:bridgendbluebird30 wrote:bluebird58 wrote:Didn't we always know this? That players had to go before others could be brought in?
And people on here don't realise the expenses involved in running a squad in the Premier League? Parachute payments are there to fund you and prevent you going out of business, not to finance another promotion campaign? The stupid negative people on here really piss me off.
So it's showing ambition not to sell a penny of your parachute payments or income from player sales? There's a need of having a happy balance of strengthening the squad to push on and reducing the debt at the same time. At the moment the club are selling all of the quality in the squad and bringing in bargain basement players. We are not in the Premier League, we are in the Championship. Everyone wants to be positive and see the club progress but at the moment all that seems to being built is a League 1 team.
If Slade does well then that would be great but based on last years performances & if we have 4/5 points from the first 6 games would you be happy?
You're a glass half empty person, aren't you?
Just being realistic not like done of the dreamers on here. Great to see the club do well but since Slade came in we are going backwards & the club are not showing signs of their ambition for promotion. Get real.
Sat Aug 01, 2015 9:32 pm
Sat Aug 01, 2015 9:45 pm
carlccfc wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:It was CLEARLY stated if we went back blue investment would stop like it was before, the same way before we went red then he threatened to pull the investment because of the so called fuss and then changed his mind and went red anyway. I've no idea why people are moaning online. This was always going to happen the day we went down from the premier league. Even my 11 year old lad knows tan is getting what ever money he can from within the club and will continue to do so
Ian, not be funny but when was this stated ?
I don't recall ever a condition being put on us going back to blue meant no money being spent.
Money had certainly been stopped but that was before the return to blue happened.
Sat Aug 01, 2015 9:54 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:He Plays on the Wright wrote:We don't really need any more players imo but if Marshall does go then a sum of that money should be used to replace him.
I agree we don't need any more players I think the team is good enough.
Sat Aug 01, 2015 10:31 pm
Sun Aug 02, 2015 8:47 am
Sun Aug 02, 2015 12:59 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Tan has promised Slade funds to spend on new players if the deal with David Marshall goes through
So far Slade has had to wheel and deal in the transfer market with No funds.
Sun Aug 02, 2015 1:02 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:carlccfc wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:It was CLEARLY stated if we went back blue investment would stop like it was before, the same way before we went red then he threatened to pull the investment because of the so called fuss and then changed his mind and went red anyway. I've no idea why people are moaning online. This was always going to happen the day we went down from the premier league. Even my 11 year old lad knows tan is getting what ever money he can from within the club and will continue to do so
Ian, not be funny but when was this stated ?
I don't recall ever a condition being put on us going back to blue meant no money being spent.
Money had certainly been stopped but that was before the return to blue happened.
No BB77 is essentially right on this one.From the outset we've all understood the levels of investment would differ according to the colour we played in.I believe Tan had made up his mind long before it was announced we would be returning to blue.
Sun Aug 02, 2015 2:20 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Tan has promised Slade funds to spend on new players if the deal with David Marshall goes through
So far Slade has had to wheel and deal in the transfer market with No funds.
Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:14 am
carlccfc wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:It was CLEARLY stated if we went back blue investment would stop like it was before, the same way before we went red then he threatened to pull the investment because of the so called fuss and then changed his mind and went red anyway. I've no idea why people are moaning online. This was always going to happen the day we went down from the premier league. Even my 11 year old lad knows tan is getting what ever money he can from within the club and will continue to do so
Ian, not be funny but when was this stated ?
I don't recall ever a condition being put on us going back to blue meant no money being spent.
Money had certainly been stopped but that was before the return to blue happened.