Sun Jul 05, 2015 6:49 pm
Sun Jul 05, 2015 6:56 pm
Sun Jul 05, 2015 7:00 pm
Sun Jul 05, 2015 7:01 pm
Sun Jul 05, 2015 7:24 pm
Sun Jul 05, 2015 7:35 pm
Depressed Blue wrote:Are wolves really a bigger club than us?.
Sun Jul 05, 2015 7:35 pm
Depressed Blue wrote:Are wolves really a bigger club than us?.
Sun Jul 05, 2015 9:12 pm
Sun Jul 05, 2015 9:14 pm
cendl blue wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:Are wolves really a bigger club than us?.
Yes loads more history and a larger fanbase if these count as criteria for being bigger
Sun Jul 05, 2015 9:15 pm
Sun Jul 05, 2015 9:31 pm
Sun Jul 05, 2015 9:55 pm
Sun Jul 05, 2015 10:12 pm
Depressed Blue wrote:Are wolves really a bigger club than us?.
Mon Jul 06, 2015 5:16 am
Depressed Blue wrote:Are wolves really a bigger club than us?.
Mon Jul 06, 2015 7:24 am
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:Are wolves really a bigger club than us?.
Yes without any doubt.
Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:19 am
Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:20 am
Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:20 am
Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:34 am
Steve Zodiak wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:Are wolves really a bigger club than us?.
Yes without any doubt.
Far bigger than us, plus according to other forums and the press, generally expected to be promotion contenders this season. Looking at the odds for Wolves there are 3 or 4 teams which are more fancied than them, while most bookies have us behind around 12 to 13 teams. We are seen by most to be a mid table side while Wolves are expected to be up towards the top. I said on here last week that if I was a player I would choose Wolves over us without a second thought. Plenty more players around though, just hope Slade can persuade some of the better ones to join us.
Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:42 am
Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:47 am
pembroke allan wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:Are wolves really a bigger club than us?.
Yes without any doubt.
Far bigger than us, plus according to other forums and the press, generally expected to be promotion contenders this season. Looking at the odds for Wolves there are 3 or 4 teams which are more fancied than them, while most bookies have us behind around 12 to 13 teams. We are seen by most to be a mid table side while Wolves are expected to be up towards the top. I said on here last week that if I was a player I would choose Wolves over us without a second thought. Plenty more players around though, just hope Slade can persuade some of the better ones to join us.
You choose wolves every time over us? What if city offered substantially more money? Or wouldn't that effect players decision?
Safe to say wolves are generally a bigger club but counts for little when monies concerned!
Mon Jul 06, 2015 12:07 pm
Mon Jul 06, 2015 12:13 pm
BlueSince1908 wrote:[the club who choose where player is loaned out yote="pembroke allan"]Steve Zodiak wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:Are wolves really a bigger club than us?.
Yes without any doubt.
Far bigger than us, plus according to other forums and the press, generally expected to be promotion contenders this season. Looking at the odds for Wolves there are 3 or 4 teams which are more fancied than them, while most bookies have us behind around 12 to 13 teams. We are seen by most to be a mid table side while Wolves are expected to be up towards the top. I said on here last week that if I was a player I would choose Wolves over us without a second thought. Plenty more players around though, just hope Slade can persuade some of the better ones to join us.
You choose wolves every time over us? What if city offered substantially more money? Or wouldn't that effect players decision?
Safe to say wolves are generally a bigger club but counts for little when monies concerned!
Mon Jul 06, 2015 12:16 pm
Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:04 pm
BlueSince1908 wrote:Ah I see! Think they'd choose Wolves as he would be a direct replacement for Sako, in that case.