Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:24 pm
Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:31 pm
Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:01 pm
Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:13 pm
Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:28 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:Well 2 of you got the balls to reply as tan haters
not sure why you persist in calling me vinny though annis
you know I hate the rebrand as much as anyone
you know how much blue I wear every day not just match days
but I can not let that cloud my judgement on other matters
Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:50 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:all the tan haters ffs make your mind up and stick to it
Have always lobbied for a return to blue since day one and have given praise for some of Tans work but also spoke out at some of his actions, so certainly sticking to my continued stance.
do you want our debt reduced. if so stop moaning when tan does something to help our running costs like getting not required / unused players off the wage bill
Why not sell our unwanted/unused players, cheaply if need be in two weeks time and get something back for them, and not just terminate contracts ?
like paying off historical debt that was costing us high interest (tans interest charges are zero I believe).
Tan is loaning us the money at 7% interest
time to stop letting the rebrand cloud all your other thinking
My judgement is not clouded but your love-in for Tan seems to be playing tricks on your mind
reading most threads on here people seem to be contradicting themselves every day all due to the rebrand
For someone who says he is against the rebrand you tend to argue on the wrong side of the fence.
Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:45 pm
carlccfc wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:all the tan haters ffs make your mind up and stick to it
Have always lobbied for a return to blue since day one and have given praise for some of Tans work but also spoke out at some of his actions, so certainly sticking to my continued stance.
do you want our debt reduced. if so stop moaning when tan does something to help our running costs like getting not required / unused players off the wage bill
Why not sell our unwanted/unused players, cheaply if need be in two weeks time and get something back for them, and not just terminate contracts ?
like paying off historical debt that was costing us high interest (tans interest charges are zero I believe).
Tan is loaning us the money at 7% interest
time to stop letting the rebrand cloud all your other thinking
My judgement is not clouded but your love-in for Tan seems to be playing tricks on your mind
reading most threads on here people seem to be contradicting themselves every day all due to the rebrand
For someone who says he is against the rebrand you tend to argue on the wrong side of the fence.
Sat Dec 20, 2014 11:03 am