Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:19 pm
Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:40 pm
Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:42 pm
Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:54 pm
Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:00 pm
Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:03 pm
Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:23 pm
Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:09 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:not sure if im right but isn't tans debt interest free NOW
wonder how much interest the old debts were incurring
im lead to believe the ray ranson debt was originally charging 50% ffs
if credit is due to tan ffs lets give it to him
maybe just maybe tan is trying to get our club self suffiecent before doing the final act of debt to equity
also the way its being reported is the recently paid of debts to date are owing to tan not to our club
anyone got the real facts for us to see ffs
Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:46 pm
Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:46 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:not sure if im right but isn't tans debt interest free NOW
wonder how much interest the old debts were incurring
im lead to believe the ray ranson debt was originally charging 50% ffs
if credit is due to tan ffs lets give it to him
maybe just maybe tan is trying to get our club self suffiecent before doing the final act of debt to equity
also the way its being reported is the recently paid of debts to date are owing to tan not to our club
anyone got the real facts for us to see ffs
Steve Tan is never going to do the debt to equity on the scale we are hoping. He would lose face in the business world because the club is just not worth that value. All the attention seeking broadcast fro the Trust will not change him.
Tan will get our club self sufficient. No more high profile signing for us. Once we has the books balanced guess where the parachute payment will be going.
I will say in two years time he will be in a position to sell the club at a reasonable pice where he has lost nothing. Debt to equity....forget it.