Cardiff City Football Forum | Cardiff City FC Messageboard

Forever Blue wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:

wez1927 wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:Ffs there has been hundreds of players who u have been told to train with youth team, and far better and higher profile ones than Carla!! This board is becoming a joke with its constant sniping at club over everything that is said this time it's a player but Slade tan ect ect get blame? Carla was very unprofessional to go to press about things says a lot about him? And he obvious wants to go well good to riddence as pointed out he's long way down pecking order.

it's getting a bit desprate now ,anything to have a go

Think its time some people on here find something else to do on Saturday or find another club to support because they are not supporting city with constant bitching they are the fcking joke now!!

Perhaps our owner should leave and the circus can finally go away.

Dve wrote:

moonboots wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:It should be the managers decision whether a player is good enough not Tans decision.

Not sticking up for Tan here because I hate what he has done to our club and can never forgive him but I think there are situations where the owner has every right to tell a manager that he can't play a certain player or players. For instance if by playing someone it triggers a huge payment to another club as part of a transfer deal. This has happened at plenty of clubs before. I know this doesn't apply with Cala. Also if a player or players are deemed surplus to requirements as part of a cost cutting exercise and they are amongst the highest earners then the owner does have the right to tell the manager if he has lined them up for transfer in the next window. In Slades case I'm sure he would see this in a positive light in as much as it presents him with the opportunity to raise some cash in order to bring in some of his own signings. All this is a completely separate issue to Tan picking the team, which personally I think is not the case.

If you want to sell a player, I don´t think making him train with the academy is the way go about it. Tan just don´t like him, I reckon.

cwmbachbluebird wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:

wez1927 wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:Ffs there has been hundreds of players who u have been told to train with youth team, and far better and higher profile ones than Carla!! This board is becoming a joke with its constant sniping at club over everything that is said this time it's a player but Slade tan ect ect get blame? Carla was very unprofessional to go to press about things says a lot about him? And he obvious wants to go well good to riddence as pointed out he's long way down pecking order.

it's getting a bit desprate now ,anything to have a go

Think its time some people on here find something else to do on Saturday or find another club to support because they are not supporting city with constant bitching they are the fcking joke now!!

Perhaps our owner should leave and the circus can finally go away.

You heard anything then Annis?

pembroke allan wrote:

Dve wrote:

moonboots wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:It should be the managers decision whether a player is good enough not Tans decision.

Not sticking up for Tan here because I hate what he has done to our club and can never forgive him but I think there are situations where the owner has every right to tell a manager that he can't play a certain player or players. For instance if by playing someone it triggers a huge payment to another club as part of a transfer deal. This has happened at plenty of clubs before. I know this doesn't apply with Cala. Also if a player or players are deemed surplus to requirements as part of a cost cutting exercise and they are amongst the highest earners then the owner does have the right to tell the manager if he has lined them up for transfer in the next window. In Slades case I'm sure he would see this in a positive light in as much as it presents him with the opportunity to raise some cash in order to bring in some of his own signings. All this is a completely separate issue to Tan picking the team, which personally I think is not the case.

If you want to sell a player, I don´t think making him train with the academy is the way go about it. Tan just don´t like him, I reckon.

What about all the high profile players ordered to play with youth team? Everytime city do something its as if we are the only club in the world that as done it? people are so blinded on here would blame club cat for everything if they had one!

Blazing Saddles wrote:To have a twitter and particularly a 'Facebook for Chavs' account means that you probably have a very low IQ anyway!! - It's all fabricated crap - Move on everyone!

Dve wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:

Dve wrote:

moonboots wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:It should be the managers decision whether a player is good enough not Tans decision.

Not sticking up for Tan here because I hate what he has done to our club and can never forgive him but I think there are situations where the owner has every right to tell a manager that he can't play a certain player or players. For instance if by playing someone it triggers a huge payment to another club as part of a transfer deal. This has happened at plenty of clubs before. I know this doesn't apply with Cala. Also if a player or players are deemed surplus to requirements as part of a cost cutting exercise and they are amongst the highest earners then the owner does have the right to tell the manager if he has lined them up for transfer in the next window. In Slades case I'm sure he would see this in a positive light in as much as it presents him with the opportunity to raise some cash in order to bring in some of his own signings. All this is a completely separate issue to Tan picking the team, which personally I think is not the case.

If you want to sell a player, I don´t think making him train with the academy is the way go about it. Tan just don´t like him, I reckon.

What about all the high profile players ordered to play with youth team? Everytime city do something its as if we are the only club in the world that as done it? people are so blinded on here would blame club cat for everything if they had one!

The questions is WHY Cala is being told to train with the academy. You agree it has to be some sort of punishment?

Without having any numbers to offer, I think this typically happens when there is a conflict between a manager and a player, but this does not seem to be the case here. If Cala´s only wrongdoing is expressing his disappointment by seeing a manger leaving, then I think Tan should be big enough of a man to overlook such a thing -if the player otherwise shows commitment to the club. The imagine I´ve gotten of Tan, is of a very vindictive and egocentric person unable to forgive anything at all.

Woodville Willie wrote:I've been saying it for ages:

Cala is a bad influence in the dressing room and on the training field.

I'm no Tan fan.

BUT - Cala has just broken radio silence on Twitter. Sackable offence some would argue.

Personally, I wouldn't believe Cala's radio in the first place.

Forever Blue wrote:

Woodville Willie wrote:I've been saying it for ages:

Cala is a bad influence in the dressing room and on the training field.

I'm no Tan fan.

BUT - Cala has just broken radio silence on Twitter. Sackable offence some would argue.

Personally, I wouldn't believe Cala's radio in the first place.

What about Guerra? he has knocked on Slades door and asked for a chance,yet ignored.

wez1927 wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

Woodville Willie wrote:I've been saying it for ages:

Cala is a bad influence in the dressing room and on the training field.

I'm no Tan fan.

BUT - Cala has just broken radio silence on Twitter. Sackable offence some would argue.

Personally, I wouldn't believe Cala's radio in the first place.

What about Guerra? he has knocked on Slades door and asked for a chance,yet ignored.

But slade has said in an interview that he's not done anything in training or in dvp games to include him isn't it his choice ? Only 16 player s can be in the match day squad and we got over 30 players all can't play

wez1927 wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

Woodville Willie wrote:I've been saying it for ages:

Cala is a bad influence in the dressing room and on the training field.

I'm no Tan fan.

BUT - Cala has just broken radio silence on Twitter. Sackable offence some would argue.

Personally, I wouldn't believe Cala's radio in the first place.

What about Guerra? he has knocked on Slades door and asked for a chance,yet ignored.

But slade has said in an interview that he's not done anything in training or in dvp games to include him isn't it his choice ? Only 16 player s can be in the match day squad and we got over 30 players all can't play

Forever Blue wrote:

wez1927 wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

Woodville Willie wrote:I've been saying it for ages:

Cala is a bad influence in the dressing room and on the training field.

I'm no Tan fan.

BUT - Cala has just broken radio silence on Twitter. Sackable offence some would argue.

Personally, I wouldn't believe Cala's radio in the first place.

What about Guerra? he has knocked on Slades door and asked for a chance,yet ignored.

But slade has said in an interview that he's not done anything in training or in dvp games to include him isn't it his choice ? Only 16 player s can be in the match day squad and we got over 30 players all can't play

Guerra is Quality. not been given a chance?

And Slade saying Matt Daehli was injured?

wez1927 wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

wez1927 wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

Woodville Willie wrote:I've been saying it for ages:

Cala is a bad influence in the dressing room and on the training field.

I'm no Tan fan.

BUT - Cala has just broken radio silence on Twitter. Sackable offence some would argue.

Personally, I wouldn't believe Cala's radio in the first place.

What about Guerra? he has knocked on Slades door and asked for a chance,yet ignored.

But slade has said in an interview that he's not done anything in training or in dvp games to include him isn't it his choice ? Only 16 player s can be in the match day squad and we got over 30 players all can't play

Guerra is Quality. not been given a chance?

And Slade saying Matt Daehli was injured?

but your not the manager and you don't take training sessions how do you know that slade isn't right ,Guerra could be garbage in training

pembroke allan wrote:

Dve wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:

Dve wrote:

moonboots wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:It should be the managers decision whether a player is good enough not Tans decision.

Not sticking up for Tan here because I hate what he has done to our club and can never forgive him but I think there are situations where the owner has every right to tell a manager that he can't play a certain player or players. For instance if by playing someone it triggers a huge payment to another club as part of a transfer deal. This has happened at plenty of clubs before. I know this doesn't apply with Cala. Also if a player or players are deemed surplus to requirements as part of a cost cutting exercise and they are amongst the highest earners then the owner does have the right to tell the manager if he has lined them up for transfer in the next window. In Slades case I'm sure he would see this in a positive light in as much as it presents him with the opportunity to raise some cash in order to bring in some of his own signings. All this is a completely separate issue to Tan picking the team, which personally I think is not the case.

If you want to sell a player, I don´t think making him train with the academy is the way go about it. Tan just don´t like him, I reckon.

What about all the high profile players ordered to play with youth team? Everytime city do something its as if we are the only club in the world that as done it? people are so blinded on here would blame club cat for everything if they had one!

The questions is WHY Cala is being told to train with the academy. You agree it has to be some sort of punishment?

Without having any numbers to offer, I think this typically happens when there is a conflict between a manager and a player, but this does not seem to be the case here. If Cala´s only wrongdoing is expressing his disappointment by seeing a manger leaving, then I think Tan should be big enough of a man to overlook such a thing -if the player otherwise shows commitment to the club. The imagine I´ve gotten of Tan, is of a very vindictive and egocentric person unable to forgive anything at all.

Point is players get this punishment or whatever you call it for a reason? its Always the case it's not because the owner says so? Or do you think cala is innocent of doing nothing? This is the actions of a player who wants a move been done millions of times! But guess that's not possibly the reason? It as to be tan no other reason can be true!

Forever Blue wrote:

wez1927 wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

wez1927 wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

Woodville Willie wrote:I've been saying it for ages:

Cala is a bad influence in the dressing room and on the training field.

I'm no Tan fan.

BUT - Cala has just broken radio silence on Twitter. Sackable offence some would argue.

Personally, I wouldn't believe Cala's radio in the first place.

What about Guerra? he has knocked on Slades door and asked for a chance,yet ignored.

But slade has said in an interview that he's not done anything in training or in dvp games to include him isn't it his choice ? Only 16 player s can be in the match day squad and we got over 30 players all can't play

Guerra is Quality. not been given a chance?

And Slade saying Matt Daehli was injured?

but your not the manager and you don't take training sessions how do you know that slade isn't right ,Guerra could be garbage in training

I agree I am not, our bench is stronger than the first team, lets hope come May, Slade proves the majority wrong including myself

Woodville Willie wrote:I've been saying it for ages:

Cala is a bad influence in the dressing room and on the training field.

I'm no Tan fan.

BUT - Cala has just broken radio silence on Twitter. Sackable offence some would argue.

Personally, I wouldn't believe Cala's radio in the first place.

No but you can believe in the Nukes Chief

pembroke allan wrote:

Dve wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:

Dve wrote:

moonboots wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:It should be the managers decision whether a player is good enough not Tans decision.

Not sticking up for Tan here because I hate what he has done to our club and can never forgive him but I think there are situations where the owner has every right to tell a manager that he can't play a certain player or players. For instance if by playing someone it triggers a huge payment to another club as part of a transfer deal. This has happened at plenty of clubs before. I know this doesn't apply with Cala. Also if a player or players are deemed surplus to requirements as part of a cost cutting exercise and they are amongst the highest earners then the owner does have the right to tell the manager if he has lined them up for transfer in the next window. In Slades case I'm sure he would see this in a positive light in as much as it presents him with the opportunity to raise some cash in order to bring in some of his own signings. All this is a completely separate issue to Tan picking the team, which personally I think is not the case.

If you want to sell a player, I don´t think making him train with the academy is the way go about it. Tan just don´t like him, I reckon.

What about all the high profile players ordered to play with youth team? Everytime city do something its as if we are the only club in the world that as done it? people are so blinded on here would blame club cat for everything if they had one!

The questions is WHY Cala is being told to train with the academy. You agree it has to be some sort of punishment?

Without having any numbers to offer, I think this typically happens when there is a conflict between a manager and a player, but this does not seem to be the case here. If Cala´s only wrongdoing is expressing his disappointment by seeing a manger leaving, then I think Tan should be big enough of a man to overlook such a thing -if the player otherwise shows commitment to the club. The imagine I´ve gotten of Tan, is of a very vindictive and egocentric person unable to forgive anything at all.

Point is players get this punishment or whatever you call it for a reason? its Always the case it's not because the owner says so? Or do you think cala is innocent of doing nothing? This is the actions of a player who wants a move been done millions of times! But guess that's not possibly the reason? It as to be tan no other reason can be true!

Grange End Star wrote:Whatever has happened freezing out players like Cala and Guerra without giving them time to adapt to a foreign country and a totally different league is shocking man management and a terrible indictment of our scouting network.

To buy these players in the first place and then virtually ignore them when they sign for us is beyond comprehension.

Thought slades strength was his man managment ??

Forever Blue wrote:

wez1927 wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

wez1927 wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

Woodville Willie wrote:I've been saying it for ages:

Cala is a bad influence in the dressing room and on the training field.

I'm no Tan fan.

BUT - Cala has just broken radio silence on Twitter. Sackable offence some would argue.

Personally, I wouldn't believe Cala's radio in the first place.

What about Guerra? he has knocked on Slades door and asked for a chance,yet ignored.

But slade has said in an interview that he's not done anything in training or in dvp games to include him isn't it his choice ? Only 16 player s can be in the match day squad and we got over 30 players all can't play

Guerra is Quality. not been given a chance?

And Slade saying Matt Daehli was injured?

but your not the manager and you don't take training sessions how do you know that slade isn't right ,Guerra could be garbage in training

I agree I am not, our bench is stronger than the first team, lets hope come May, Slade proves the majority wrong including myself