Wouldnt this work better?

A forum for all things Cardiff City

Wouldnt this work better?

Postby BlueDredd » Wed Oct 01, 2014 1:18 pm

Could possibly sure up the defence a little bit.. But also our full backs definitely have the potential to be wing backs.

The midfield could be mixed up, but I want to see a top 2. Kenwyne has shown his hold up play and ability to bring in other players is well over par. This is definitely something I'd like to see :bluescarf:
Attachments
formation.png
formation.png (68.35 KiB) Viewed 527 times
JUDGEMENT TIME!
User avatar
BlueDredd
 
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Hall of Justice

Wouldnt this work better?

Advertisement

Advertisement
Login or Register to remove this ad.

Re: Wouldnt this work better?

Postby Tonteg Bluebird » Wed Oct 01, 2014 1:40 pm

BlueDredd wrote:Could possibly sure up the defence a little bit.. But also our full backs definitely have the potential to be wing backs.

The midfield could be mixed up, but I want to see a top 2. Kenwyne has shown his hold up play and ability to bring in other players is well over par. This is definitely something I'd like to see :bluescarf:


Totally agree with this. I would personally play Connolly instead of Morrison mind and when Turner returns, I would drop Cala and have Turner and Connolly either side of Manga. I would also push Daehli further up behind the front two and ask Whittingham and Gunnarsson to play a bit deeper. Not sure what happened to Guerra against Bournemouth, but he showed against Middlesbrough how good he is and it's about time we give him a run of games I think, especially up if he's up front with Jones who will do all the physical work.
Tonteg Bluebird
 
Posts: 6800
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 5:26 pm

Re: Wouldnt this work better?

Postby BlueDredd » Wed Oct 01, 2014 1:44 pm

Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
BlueDredd wrote:Could possibly sure up the defence a little bit.. But also our full backs definitely have the potential to be wing backs.

The midfield could be mixed up, but I want to see a top 2. Kenwyne has shown his hold up play and ability to bring in other players is well over par. This is definitely something I'd like to see :bluescarf:


Totally agree with this. I would personally play Connolly instead of Morrison mind and when Turner returns, I would drop Cala and have Turner and Connolly either side of Manga. I would also push Daehli further up behind the front two and ask Whittingham and Gunnarsson to play a bit deeper. Not sure what happened to Guerra against Bournemouth, but he showed against Middlesbrough how good he is and it's about time we give him a run of games I think, especially up if he's up front with Jones who will do all the physical work.

I haven't quite yet been convinced by morrison either. So i agree with you there. I'd like to see Cala in the squad because his first touch and distribution is spot on. I think he could put a nice balance to the side. I was listening to redknapp on Talk Sport yesterday giving his opinion on playing 3 at the back and using wing backs. It seems like a good enough strategy with a well balanced side :bluescarf:
JUDGEMENT TIME!
User avatar
BlueDredd
 
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Hall of Justice

Re: Wouldnt this work better?

Postby A block » Wed Oct 01, 2014 2:11 pm

The problem with playing 3/5 at the back is defenders aren't used to it and it takes a lot of time for them to get used to.

It isn't the sort of thing you want to introduce during the season in my opinion. It's something that should be worked at over the summer.

Although that starting 11 has zero balance in my opinion and we would get walked over by most teams in midfield.
A block
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:53 pm



Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Clickagy [Bot], cmorris1927, Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Howieblue, ias [Bot], Magpie [Bot], mugsy, Proximic [Bot], robbo and 192 guests

Disclaimer :
The views and comments entered in these forums are personal and are not necessarily those of the management of this board.
The management of this board is not responsible for the content of any external internet sites.