Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:37 pm

he's done a lot of good since joining our club, so let's not jump on him too much... but fairplay, tonight he is playing dogshit.
think we'll see rav soon. hope we see rav soon.
:thumbright:

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:38 pm

or nooney!

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:38 pm

or anyone.

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:38 pm

He's 19 no one should be moaning.

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:39 pm

observation sunshine not moaning.

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:40 pm

Yeah your right but it could just be the fact he's being played out of position on the feckin wing again. Either pick him as an attacking mid or a number 10 or just dont play him. Gunnarson as a support striker ffs :roll:

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:41 pm

no.10 i think. adeyemi should drop to bench and reshuffle

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:43 pm

Sub adeyemi for morrison!

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:44 pm

PortBlue wrote:no.10 i think. adeyemi should drop to bench and reshuffle


Now that makes more sense :thumbup:

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:47 pm

PortBlue wrote:observation sunshine not moaning.


Who said you were?

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:48 pm

there was no other party in the conversation lovely boy :lol: :wave:

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:48 pm

He's playing out wide to allow Adeyemi to come in and add a bit of steel in centre midfield, hasn't exactly worked mind.

If we look to go and get a winner, I think we might see Adeyemi come off and Ravel/Daehli play the 10 role with Gunnars dropping alongside Whitts.

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:51 pm

He is always gonna struggle when we play hoofball.
Why did they put adeyemi in the team? Gunnarson is not a no 10.

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:54 pm

Tommy2 wrote:He is always gonna struggle when we play hoofball.
Why did they put adeyemi in the team? Gunnarson is not a no 10.


:thumbup:

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:59 pm

There's the change :D :bluescarf: :ayatollah:

Re: daehli

Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:22 pm

PortBlue wrote:there was no other party in the conversation lovely boy :lol: :wave:


Who said anyone was moaning? I simply said no one should be moaning. If you'd like to know the definition of the word 'should' http://www.dictoriary.com is a handy reference.