Tomorrow, tan explains why he will keep CCFC red

According to Jim White

I wonder if by some sort of warped logic he thinks either


a. the club will be easier to sell as a 'red' team to a Far East buyer

or

b. that he thinks a new buyer will see an opportunity to get fans onside by going back to blue, so by leaving it as it is the club might actually be more attractive to a buyer (potential) . He knows he's unpopular with fans now and probably thinks 'who cares I'll be gone soon' and sees no point in getting the fans onside by changing back.

I wonder if by some sort of warped logic he thinks either


a. the club will be easier to sell as a 'red' team to a Far East buyer

or

b. that he thinks a new buyer will see an opportunity to get fans onside by going back to blue, so by leaving it as it is the club might actually be more attractive to a buyer (potential) . He knows he's unpopular with fans now and probably thinks 'who cares I'll be gone soon' and sees no point in getting the fans onside by changing back.

Probably one of the above, doubt he will admit it though, something about luck i reckon

Let's hope Jim White has the balls to ask him how red was lucky last season.

Doubt he will though.

Let's hope Jim White has the balls to ask him how red was lucky last season.

Doubt he will though.

It'll be a ing swim back across the shark-infested waters if he does, as Tan will be sure to withdraw the helicopter ride! LOL

I wonder if by some sort of warped logic he thinks either


a. the club will be easier to sell as a 'red' team to a Far East buyer

or

b. that he thinks a new buyer will see an opportunity to get fans onside by going back to blue, so by leaving it as it is the club might actually be more attractive to a buyer (potential) . He knows he's unpopular with fans now and probably thinks 'who cares I'll be gone soon' and sees no point in getting the fans onside by changing back.

-Most definately the later, top logic tho.

I wonder if by some sort of warped logic he thinks either


a. the club will be easier to sell as a 'red' team to a Far East buyer

or

b. that he thinks a new buyer will see an opportunity to get fans onside by going back to blue, so by leaving it as it is the club might actually be more attractive to a buyer (potential) . He knows he's unpopular with fans now and probably thinks 'who cares I'll be gone soon' and sees no point in getting the fans onside by changing back.

-Most definately the later, top logic tho.

That's the one thing I think any prospective buyer would have to do. It's a no brainer really. It would definitely be a plus point from a buyer's perspective to think "I can get the fans to love me, and all I have to do is change their shirt colour and badge... easy ride"

Just fingers crossed it;s not another far east buyer... Somebody in Wales has to have £80m surely?! What about the assembly... can't they put in?! have a football team owned by the country (in some ways)...

What about the assembly... can't they put in?! have a football team owned by the country (in some ways)...

I hope to God that you aren't serious.

What about the assembly... can't they put in?! have a football team owned by the country (in some ways)...

I hope to God that you aren't serious.

what's funny Alex, if Westminster chip in too we will be in a strong position for a takeover

Let's hope Jim White has the balls to ask him how red was lucky last season.

Doubt he will though.

hope he does though, good call.

What about the assembly... can't they put in?! have a football team owned by the country (in some ways)...

I hope to God that you aren't serious.

Good god no! lol. Can you imagine.