No profit on any Malky signings yet.

Why not ? Even arsenal offered to pay £1 more than the release clause regarding Suarez last season so technically had that been accepted then it's still paying more than the clause figure itself

Suarez's release clause was that he could talk to anyone who bud MORE than 40 million. Campbell's is 800k.

If a house was on the market for 150k would you pay 155k?

If you are in a race with another buyer then yes. In this case more than one club were interested on Campbell and it's still up to the club on who they prefer to do business with whether there's a release clause involved or not

how did you get anyone to vote for you?
houses do not have a say in who lives in them.
at least no house ive lived in has spoken to me ...
did your house insist on a release clause?......if.some hot bird wants to live here you have to sell it to her if she offers £x

Why not ? Even arsenal offered to pay £1 more than the release clause regarding Suarez last season so technically had that been accepted then it's still paying more than the clause figure itself

Suarez's release clause was that he could talk to anyone who bud MORE than 40 million. Campbell's is 800k.

If a house was on the market for 150k would you pay 155k?

If you are in a race with another buyer then yes. In this case more than one club were interested on Campbell and it's still up to the club on who they prefer to do business with whether there's a release clause involved or not

how did you get anyone to vote for you?
houses do not have a say in who lives in them.
at least no house ive lived in has spoken to me ...
did your house insist on a release clause?......if.some hot bird wants to live here you have to sell it to her if she offers £x

What are you talking about ? If it is more than one party interested in buying a house/player or whatever then surely that becomes a price war then it's up to the seller to want the best deal. Basic economics isn't it ? As quiet often a price war increases the value from the original listed price!! You only have to go to an auction for proof of that

Why not ? Even arsenal offered to pay £1 more than the release clause regarding Suarez last season so technically had that been accepted then it's still paying more than the clause figure itself

Suarez's release clause was that he could talk to anyone who bud MORE than 40 million. Campbell's is 800k.

If a house was on the market for 150k would you pay 155k?

If you are in a race with another buyer then yes. In this case more than one club were interested on Campbell and it's still up to the club on who they prefer to do business with whether there's a release clause involved or not

how did you get anyone to vote for you?
houses do not have a say in who lives in them.
at least no house ive lived in has spoken to me ...
did your house insist on a release clause?......if.some hot bird wants to live here you have to sell it to her if she offers £x

What are you talking about ? If it is more than one party interested in buying a house/player or whatever then surely that becomes a price war then it's up to the seller to want the best deal. Basic economics isn't it ? As quiet often a price war increases the value from the original listed price!! You only have to go to an auction for proof of that

the point of a release clause being put into a players contract by him or his agent is to maximise the players options, not for it to be an auction where if Tronso offer the most your guy has to freeze his nuts off for 3 years playing against polar bears......

People also need to realise that the club still have some hold on the player even if he has a release clause in their contract otherwise it would be chaos!!! For example a player has a release clause for a million, then a club comes in and puts a bid in for a million but very low instalments over many years. The contracted club are well within their rights to turn that down.

Why not ? Even arsenal offered to pay £1 more than the release clause regarding Suarez last season so technically had that been accepted then it's still paying more than the clause figure itself

Suarez's release clause was that he could talk to anyone who bud MORE than 40 million. Campbell's is 800k.

If a house was on the market for 150k would you pay 155k?

If you are in a race with another buyer then yes. In this case more than one club were interested on Campbell and it's still up to the club on who they prefer to do business with whether there's a release clause involved or not

how did you get anyone to vote for you?
houses do not have a say in who lives in them.
at least no house ive lived in has spoken to me ...
did your house insist on a release clause?......if.some hot bird wants to live here you have to sell it to her if she offers £x

What are you talking about ? If it is more than one party interested in buying a house/player or whatever then surely that becomes a price war then it's up to the seller to want the best deal. Basic economics isn't it ? As quiet often a price war increases the value from the original listed price!! You only have to go to an auction for proof of that

are you seriously this thick..or is this an attempt to wrestle your way back into this weeks ten most stupid posts?
if it is your short by a distance.........need to start reading UFO weekly..

Why not ? Even arsenal offered to pay £1 more than the release clause regarding Suarez last season so technically had that been accepted then it's still paying more than the clause figure itself

Suarez's release clause was that he could talk to anyone who bud MORE than 40 million. Campbell's is 800k.

If a house was on the market for 150k would you pay 155k?

If you are in a race with another buyer then yes. In this case more than one club were interested on Campbell and it's still up to the club on who they prefer to do business with whether there's a release clause involved or not

how did you get anyone to vote for you?
houses do not have a say in who lives in them.
at least no house ive lived in has spoken to me ...
did your house insist on a release clause?......if.some hot bird wants to live here you have to sell it to her if she offers £x

What are you talking about ? If it is more than one party interested in buying a house/player or whatever then surely that becomes a price war then it's up to the seller to want the best deal. Basic economics isn't it ? As quiet often a price war increases the value from the original listed price!! You only have to go to an auction for proof of that

are you seriously this thick..or is this an attempt to wrestle your way back into this weeks ten most stupid posts?
if it is your short by a distance.........need to start reading UFO weekly..

Listen I know the stereotypical Jewish comments when it comes to parting with money but prices wars in many industries do happen if you have more than one interested party at the same time

Why not ? Even arsenal offered to pay £1 more than the release clause regarding Suarez last season so technically had that been accepted then it's still paying more than the clause figure itself

Suarez's release clause was that he could talk to anyone who bud MORE than 40 million. Campbell's is 800k.

If a house was on the market for 150k would you pay 155k?

If you are in a race with another buyer then yes. In this case more than one club were interested on Campbell and it's still up to the club on who they prefer to do business with whether there's a release clause involved or not

how did you get anyone to vote for you?
houses do not have a say in who lives in them.
at least no house ive lived in has spoken to me ...
did your house insist on a release clause?......if.some hot bird wants to live here you have to sell it to her if she offers £x

What are you talking about ? If it is more than one party interested in buying a house/player or whatever then surely that becomes a price war then it's up to the seller to want the best deal. Basic economics isn't it ? As quiet often a price war increases the value from the original listed price!! You only have to go to an auction for proof of that

are you seriously this thick..or is this an attempt to wrestle your way back into this weeks ten most stupid posts?
if it is your short by a distance.........need to start reading UFO weekly..

Listen I know the stereotypical Jewish comments when it comes to parting with money but prices wars in many industries do happen if you have more than one interested party at the same time

not if the price of the product is determined by someone other than the seller.......eg.if a can of.pepsi is stamped RRP 59p ....mr Patel down the news agent tells you
its a quid............do you pay him a pound..........or tell him f**k ..

and what the f**k has this got to do with religeon,race,colour,language?

Last edited by simon.wiesenthal on Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Why not ? Even arsenal offered to pay £1 more than the release clause regarding Suarez last season so technically had that been accepted then it's still paying more than the clause figure itself

Suarez's release clause was that he could talk to anyone who bud MORE than 40 million. Campbell's is 800k.

If a house was on the market for 150k would you pay 155k?

If you are in a race with another buyer then yes. In this case more than one club were interested on Campbell and it's still up to the club on who they prefer to do business with whether there's a release clause involved or not

how did you get anyone to vote for you?
houses do not have a say in who lives in them.
at least no house ive lived in has spoken to me ...
did your house insist on a release clause?......if.some hot bird wants to live here you have to sell it to her if she offers £x

What are you talking about ? If it is more than one party interested in buying a house/player or whatever then surely that becomes a price war then it's up to the seller to want the best deal. Basic economics isn't it ? As quiet often a price war increases the value from the original listed price!! You only have to go to an auction for proof of that

are you seriously this thick..or is this an attempt to wrestle your way back into this weeks ten most stupid posts?
if it is your short by a distance.........need to start reading UFO weekly..

Listen I know the stereotypical Jewish comments when it comes to parting with money but prices wars in many industries do happen if you have more than one interested party at the same time

not if the price of the product is determined by someone other than the seller.......eg..pepsi stamp RRP 59p on a can.......mr Patel down the news agent tells you
its a quid............do you pay him a pound..........or tell him f**k off

Well if Mr.Petal had two customers who wanted to buy that can of Pepsi and one would only pay the RRP 59p but the other offered £69 for it then Mr.Patel is well within his rights to sell to the highest bidder!!!

Why not ? Even arsenal offered to pay £1 more than the release clause regarding Suarez last season so technically had that been accepted then it's still paying more than the clause figure itself

Suarez's release clause was that he could talk to anyone who bud MORE than 40 million. Campbell's is 800k.

If a house was on the market for 150k would you pay 155k?

If you are in a race with another buyer then yes. In this case more than one club were interested on Campbell and it's still up to the club on who they prefer to do business with whether there's a release clause involved or not

how did you get anyone to vote for you?
houses do not have a say in who lives in them.
at least no house ive lived in has spoken to me ...
did your house insist on a release clause?......if.some hot bird wants to live here you have to sell it to her if she offers £x

What are you talking about ? If it is more than one party interested in buying a house/player or whatever then surely that becomes a price war then it's up to the seller to want the best deal. Basic economics isn't it ? As quiet often a price war increases the value from the original listed price!! You only have to go to an auction for proof of that

are you seriously this thick..or is this an attempt to wrestle your way back into this weeks ten most stupid posts?
if it is your short by a distance.........need to start reading UFO weekly..

Listen I know the stereotypical Jewish comments when it comes to parting with money but prices wars in many industries do happen if you have more than one interested party at the same time

not if the price of the product is determined by someone other than the seller.......eg..pepsi stamp RRP 59p on a can.......mr Patel down the news agent tells you
its a quid............do you pay him a pound..........or tell him f**k off

Well if Mr.Petal had two customers who wanted to buy that can of Pepsi and one would only pay the RRP 59p but the other offered £69 for it then Mr.Patel is well within his rights to sell to the highest bidder!!!

i give up

Yes please do because you are making a fool out of yourself

Yes please do because you are making a fool out of yourself

oh thats what happened.............Campbells agent must be a fool too,fancy sticking a clause like that in when it doesnt really mean anything...............

Yes please do because you are making a fool out of yourself

oh thats what happened.............Campbells agent must be a fool too,fancy sticking a clause like that in when it doesnt really mean anything...............

Release clause was lower than the agreed fee for the Campbell deal because Leicester were the other party interested.

Once a club has met the release clause, they HAVE to accept the offer.

It is then down to the player to decide where he goes, the club have no leverage at all once the release clause has been triggered.

If a club then offers more than the release clause, well they are foolish as it doesn't give them any greater leverage with the selling club as the selling club has no say in where the player goes.

Once a club has met the release clause, they HAVE to accept the offer.

It is then down to the player to decide where he goes, the club have no leverage at all once the release clause has been triggered.

If a club then offers more than the release clause, well they are foolish as it doesn't give them any greater leverage with the selling club as the selling club has no say in where the player goes.

Rubbish and if that's the case then Palace would be well within their rights to say that we will pay you the £800,000 but won't pay you it for 100 years!!! Bollox can they do that and you know it

Conway? Gestede?

Both got for nowt and sold for nowt. Same as cowie.

That's interesting. Blackburn think they paid £300k for Rudy.

It could be argued that the money we got from getting promotion and payments for relegation would easily show it was worth making a slight loss on some of malky's signings? no?

Conway? Gestede?

Both got for nowt and sold for nowt. Same as cowie.

That's interesting. Blackburn think they paid £300k for Rudy.

They are lying. They took a player who was out of contract at the end of the season and got him for free and gave him a 3 year contract.

It could be argued that the money we got from getting promotion and payments for relegation would easily show it was worth making a slight loss on some of malky's signings? no?

Cornelius a slight loss. Oh dear.

Conway? Gestede?

Both got for nowt and sold for nowt. Same as cowie.

That's interesting. Blackburn think they paid £300k for Rudy.

They are lying. They took a player who was out of contract at the end of the season and got him for free and gave him a 3 year contract.

OK - you know better than the local Blackburn Rovers reporter on their local paper.

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sp ... _/?ref=mac

Once a club has met the release clause, they HAVE to accept the offer.

It is then down to the player to decide where he goes, the club have no leverage at all once the release clause has been triggered.

If a club then offers more than the release clause, well they are foolish as it doesn't give them any greater leverage with the selling club as the selling club has no say in where the player goes.

Rubbish and if that's the case then Palace would be well within their rights to say that we will pay you the £800,000 but won't pay you it for 100 years!!! Bollox can they do that and you know it

it doesnt work like that..and im pretty sure your aware it doesnt........your just jealous of tonteg

Conway? Gestede?

Both got for nowt and sold for nowt. Same as cowie.

That's interesting. Blackburn think they paid £300k for Rudy.

They are lying. They took a player who was out of contract at the end of the season and got him for free and gave him a 3 year contract.

OK - you know better than the local Blackburn Rovers reporter on their local paper.

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sp ... _/?ref=mac

They had him on loan until the end of the season when they could get him for free. Why pay 300k?

Once a club has met the release clause, they HAVE to accept the offer.

It is then down to the player to decide where he goes, the club have no leverage at all once the release clause has been triggered.

If a club then offers more than the release clause, well they are foolish as it doesn't give them any greater leverage with the selling club as the selling club has no say in where the player goes.

Rubbish and if that's the case then Palace would be well within their rights to say that we will pay you the £800,000 but won't pay you it for 100 years!!! Bollox can they do that and you know it

it doesnt work like that..and im pretty sure your aware it doesnt........your just jealous of tonteg

So how does it work then Simon ? Because there's been many different arrangements between clubs when paying for players. So I'd look forward to your insight of exactly how it works

Conway? Gestede?

Both got for nowt and sold for nowt. Same as cowie.

That's interesting. Blackburn think they paid £300k for Rudy.

They are lying. They took a player who was out of contract at the end of the season and got him for free and gave him a 3 year contract.

OK - you know better than the local Blackburn Rovers reporter on their local paper.

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sp ... _/?ref=mac

http://www.soccerbase.com/players/playe ... r_id=60631

http://www1.skysports.com/football/play ... dy-gestede

Once a club has met the release clause, they HAVE to accept the offer.

It is then down to the player to decide where he goes, the club have no leverage at all once the release clause has been triggered.

If a club then offers more than the release clause, well they are foolish as it doesn't give them any greater leverage with the selling club as the selling club has no say in where the player goes.

Rubbish and if that's the case then Palace would be well within their rights to say that we will pay you the £800,000 but won't pay you it for 100 years!!! Bollox can they do that and you know it

it doesnt work like that..and im pretty sure your aware it doesnt........your just jealous of tonteg

So how does it work then Simon ? Because there's been many different arrangements between clubs when paying for players. So I'd look forward to your insight of exactly how it works

its been explained to you,nt just by me either......not that it should need explaining, certainly not to a football fan anyway.......so stop being a dick.........

I'm not sticking up for Malky but you often have to pay over the odds for players to come to newly promoted premier teams.

Once a club has met the release clause, they HAVE to accept the offer.

It is then down to the player to decide where he goes, the club have no leverage at all once the release clause has been triggered.

If a club then offers more than the release clause, well they are foolish as it doesn't give them any greater leverage with the selling club as the selling club has no say in where the player goes.

Rubbish and if that's the case then Palace would be well within their rights to say that we will pay you the £800,000 but won't pay you it for 100 years!!! Bollox can they do that and you know it

it doesnt work like that..and im pretty sure your aware it doesnt........your just jealous of tonteg

So how does it work then Simon ? Because there's been many different arrangements between clubs when paying for players. So I'd look forward to your insight of exactly how it works

its been explained to you,nt just by me either......not that it should need explaining, certainly not to a football fan anyway.......so stop being a dick.........

Onto person being a sick here is the one who pretends to have inside information regarding these kinda deals and each nada every example he's put our has been ripped to shreds!!!

This day and age Chuckles, it's both.

No it isn't.

How is it not? Hence why clubs like Swansea sign the likes of Bony, to improve the team and sell on for a bigger price.

It could be argued that the money we got from getting promotion and payments for relegation would easily show it was worth making a slight loss on some of malky's signings? no?

Cornelius a slight loss. Oh dear.

Yeah the cornelius signing was a very peculiar move and we lost money, but my point is earning the suggested/rumoured £90million for playing in the premier league for one year, and the parchute payments we'll receive this year not cancel out that loss? Not trying to defend Malkys signings, some of them were bad, but we've made more money in that one season in the prem (included the loss on signings) than we would've if we stayed in the champ

It could be argued that the money we got from getting promotion and payments for relegation would easily show it was worth making a slight loss on some of malky's signings? no?

Cornelius a slight loss. Oh dear.

Yeah the cornelius signing was a very peculiar move and we lost money, but my point is earning the suggested/rumoured £90million for playing in the premier league for one year, and the parchute payments we'll receive this year not cancel out that loss? Not trying to defend Malkys signings, some of them were bad, but we've made more money in that one season in the prem (included the loss on signings) than we would've if we stayed in the champ

In your honest opinion what contribution did Cornelius give to get us into the premier league ?