Cardiff City Football Forum | Cardiff City FC Messageboard

Difference was we had fans who said these 2 couldn't do a job for Newport, hilarious.

DandoCCFC wrote:Difference was we had fans who said these 2 couldn't do a job for Newport, hilarious.

Where has anyone said Conway couldn't do a job for Newport?!

Barry Chuckle wrote:

DandoCCFC wrote:Difference was we had fans who said these 2 couldn't do a job for Newport, hilarious.

Where has anyone said Conway couldn't do a job for Newport?!

plenty of people scoffing at the idea that Gestede was good enough for the championship.

glad hes doing well there!

Again, where has anyone said that about Conway?

Barry Chuckle wrote:Again, where has anyone said that about Conway?

paulh_85 wrote:

Barry Chuckle wrote:Again, where has anyone said that about Conway?

You have no idea either then?

nope. Cant remember anyone saying that.

i was staying on topic


dont want to play an "i told you so" game with you, or anyone, but i am glad to see him doing really well there, conway too. Both really good players at that level imo.

paulh_85 wrote:nope. Cant remember anyone saying that.

i was staying on topic

So was I. Someone discussed Gestede and Conway & I queried it.

I couldn't give a shit how many he is scoring elsewhere, Gestede was garbage for us. Conway however, was excellent.

id say both were somewhere in the middle.

Conway was far from excellent, and Gestede far from garbage

chuckles knows fuc.all about strikers

troobloo3339 wrote:chuckles knows fuc.all about strikers

You still crying about Whitts being MOTM on Saturday?

troobloo3339 wrote:chuckles knows fuc.all about strikers

Says the guy who said Gestede was the best striker at Cardiff and Swansea combined..... And that Whittingham isn't good enough for the championship.

Barry Chuckle wrote:

paulh_85 wrote:nope. Cant remember anyone saying that.

i was staying on topic

So was I. Someone discussed Gestede and Conway & I queried it.

I couldn't give a shit how many he is scoring elsewhere, Gestede was garbage for us. Conway however, was excellent.

Neither were good enough for the PL though.

However would have taken Conway on the wing over Cowie or Whitts who occupied those positions for us 1st half of the season.

Conway just short of pace which I think is a must for a wideman in the PL

think you will find it was premiership
was whitts mom hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

troobloo3339 wrote:was whitts mom hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

He most certainly was

despite my dislike for him, i would have put Fabio up there for MOTM, thought he was excellent.

Could he be them man to lead the line for us next season? How much do you think he'd cost? £5m?

ffs wrote:Could he be them man to lead the line for us next season? How much do you think he'd cost? £5m?

id take far more notice if he carried on banging them in next season.

A lot of players have good runs, seem to remember alan lee scoring a few just after leaving us.

If gestede goes and scores 12/15 next season then fair play, dont think there could be much argument about his ability at that level then.

Isn't that Spaniard signing for us???.

Mario wrote:Isn't that Spaniard signing for us???.

Not if we go down, apparently

Mario wrote:Isn't that Spaniard signing for us???.

No

He signed a pre contract which probably had a host of clauses in it saying he doesn't have to sign for us if X happened. Relegation would most certainly be one.

paulh_85 wrote:

ffs wrote:Could he be them man to lead the line for us next season? How much do you think he'd cost? £5m?

id take far more notice if he carried on banging them in next season.

A lot of players have good runs, seem to remember alan lee scoring a few just after leaving us.

If gestede goes and scores 12/15 next season then fair play, dont think there could be much argument about his ability at that level then.

12/15 in the championship is no great shakes

paulh_85 wrote:despite my dislike for him, i would have put Fabio up there for MOTM, thought he was excellent.

He played well but for me Whitts shaded it over Daehli.

Whitts put in a 90 minute performance, hit the post from a delicious free kick, put his penatly away, was positive when he had the ball, always available, and it was his positive play in breaking the midfield line and precision pass that led to that the slightly offside goal we had chalked off.

Daehli put in a couple of eye catchign dribbles and runs and his ball through for Mutch 1st half deserved a better finish but I thought he faded 2nd half. Wether that be through Stoke wiseing up to him, and him not getting enough ball, but he didnt have as much impact 2nd half as the 1st.

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:

paulh_85 wrote:despite my dislike for him, i would have put Fabio up there for MOTM, thought he was excellent.

He played well but for me Whitts shaded it over Daehli.

Whitts put in a 90 minute performance, hit the post from a delicious free kick, put his penatly away, was positive when he had the ball, always available, and it was his positive play in breaking the midfield line and precision pass that led to that the slightly offside goal we had chalked off.

Daehli put in a couple of eye catchign dribbles and runs and his ball through for Mutch 1st half deserved a better finish but I thought he faded 2nd half. Wether that be through Stoke wiseing up to him, and him not getting enough ball, but he didnt have as much impact 2nd half as the 1st.

I thought Whitts had a very good game Saturday, his best game for a long time. (I do think he plays better when Bellamy isn't around)

I thought there were a few contenders for man of the match though. I thought Daehli was excellent first half and he does remind me of a (not so good) Iniesta.
I thought Fabio had a very good game and though he sometimes gets caught out of position he gives us so much more going forward than any of our other full backs.

Personally though, I though Caulker deserved man of the match. I thought he was excellent Saturday and had his best game for a long time.

I've been trying to think where it went wrong in the last 25 minutes and I think Medel has gotta take a fair share of the responsibility. I think hes a shadow of the player from the first half of the season and we need him to raise his game on Sunday.

Mutch was average but he's been consistently our best player all season (bar marshall) until the last 3 or 4 games so i'll let him off.

I also want to see more from Kim. He's got talent but seems to lack balls.

thehumblegringo wrote:

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:

paulh_85 wrote:despite my dislike for him, i would have put Fabio up there for MOTM, thought he was excellent.

He played well but for me Whitts shaded it over Daehli.

Whitts put in a 90 minute performance, hit the post from a delicious free kick, put his penatly away, was positive when he had the ball, always available, and it was his positive play in breaking the midfield line and precision pass that led to that the slightly offside goal we had chalked off.

Daehli put in a couple of eye catchign dribbles and runs and his ball through for Mutch 1st half deserved a better finish but I thought he faded 2nd half. Wether that be through Stoke wiseing up to him, and him not getting enough ball, but he didnt have as much impact 2nd half as the 1st.

I thought Whitts had a very good game Saturday, his best game for a long time. (I do think he plays better when Bellamy isn't around)

I thought there were a few contenders for man of the match though. I thought Daehli was excellent first half and he does remind me of a (not so good) Iniesta.
I thought Fabio had a very good game and though he sometimes gets caught out of position he gives us so much more going forward than any of our other full backs.

Personally though, I though Caulker deserved man of the match. I thought he was excellent Saturday and had his best game for a long time.

I've been trying to think where it went wrong in the last 25 minutes and I think Medel has gotta take a fair share of the responsibility. I think hes a shadow of the player from the first half of the season and we need him to raise his game on Sunday.

Mutch was average but he's been consistently our best player all season (bar marshall) until the last 3 or 4 games so i'll let him off.

I also want to see more from Kim. He's got talent but seems to lack balls.

Is Bellamy injured? I feel like we could do with his burst of pace in the team instead of Kim who I feel slows our play down too much.

Medel, now we have had all season to judge, I think the PL is too fast for him.

Mutch needs to pick his socks up. Nows is not the stage of the season to go hiding.

Rudy scores from lucky goals, hes still a donkey imo but better than jones hes the worst striker ive seen for a good while

I rated Rudy when he was with us. He always gives 100% and was still learning. Id def choose him over Jones anyday!

Anarch0 wrote:I rated Rudy when he was with us. He always gives 100% and was still learning. Id def choose him over Jones anyday!

One week ban from football.

He,s been smashing his energy drinks down himself

the way some treat him on here
he would have to hit 50 goals a season to be rated any good