Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:24 pm
AskJeeves wrote:So nobody really knows what this mythical vision is but are happy to go along with it knowing that if it doesn't work it will probably be the end to a club that's stood for more than a century?
I can't grasp that.
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:25 pm
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:26 pm
AskJeeves wrote:Any sensible debate welcome.
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:31 pm
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:31 pm
AskJeeves wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:AskJeeves wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Doesn't take RM long does it?
Tans vision is to broadcast the rebrand across China and the Far East. If he pulls it off then the income stream will be huge. Therefore keeping Cardiff City going will be a priority. RM has not taken that into account.
What are these revenue streams then?
As I've said Liverpool make £9 million from global shirt sales and they shift more shirts than 99% of top clubs in the top leagues around the world.
If you followed the club properly RM you would know. Its all part of Tans vision and if he pulls it off all your points above are pointless.
So what is Tans vision?
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:32 pm
AskJeeves wrote:So nobody really knows what this mythical vision is but are happy to go along with it knowing that if it doesn't work it will probably be the end to a club that's stood for more than a century?
I can't grasp that.
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:36 pm
Cryogenic freezing wrote:cecilccfc wrote:Pete isn't on anywhere near 30k, get your facts right.
Who's Pete and where did I say he was on 30k?
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:38 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:AskJeeves wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:AskJeeves wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Doesn't take RM long does it?
Tans vision is to broadcast the rebrand across China and the Far East. If he pulls it off then the income stream will be huge. Therefore keeping Cardiff City going will be a priority. RM has not taken that into account.
What are these revenue streams then?
As I've said Liverpool make £9 million from global shirt sales and they shift more shirts than 99% of top clubs in the top leagues around the world.
If you followed the club properly RM you would know. Its all part of Tans vision and if he pulls it off all your points above are pointless.
So what is Tans vision?
Even the dullest amongst us can work that out who follow the club.
For your sake I will brief for you and keep it simple. Tans background is Malaysian Chinese. His vision is to have a premier football club that will be an icon for that culture in the Far East. This will produce revenue streams such as broadcasting, betting and merchandise. The potential is huge. Unfortunately for us it needs to appeal to the upcoming peasants in China who will soon be able to afford satellite television. That means getting rid of such identities like the Bluebird and Pick and Shoval song. These will be replaced by something like a dragon and a picture of a bowl of rice on the shirt.
You see its not the finances that are going to be the problem but the fact that a different culture has taken over the club. Sadly a lot of fans are not seeing that.
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:39 pm
cecilccfc wrote:Cryogenic freezing wrote:cecilccfc wrote:Pete isn't on anywhere near 30k, get your facts right.
Who's Pete and where did I say he was on 30k?
Whittingham, I know Pete well.
He's on nothing like that.
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:44 pm
Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:46 pm
AskJeeves wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:AskJeeves wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:AskJeeves wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Doesn't take RM long does it?
Tans vision is to broadcast the rebrand across China and the Far East. If he pulls it off then the income stream will be huge. Therefore keeping Cardiff City going will be a priority. RM has not taken that into account.
What are these revenue streams then?
As I've said Liverpool make £9 million from global shirt sales and they shift more shirts than 99% of top clubs in the top leagues around the world.
If you followed the club properly RM you would know. Its all part of Tans vision and if he pulls it off all your points above are pointless.
So what is Tans vision?
Even the dullest amongst us can work that out who follow the club.
For your sake I will brief for you and keep it simple. Tans background is Malaysian Chinese. His vision is to have a premier football club that will be an icon for that culture in the Far East. This will produce revenue streams such as broadcasting, betting and merchandise. The potential is huge. Unfortunately for us it needs to appeal to the upcoming peasants in China who will soon be able to afford satellite television. That means getting rid of such identities like the Bluebird and Pick and Shoval song. These will be replaced by something like a dragon and a picture of a bowl of rice on the shirt.
You see its not the finances that are going to be the problem but the fact that a different culture has taken over the club. Sadly a lot of fans are not seeing that.
So Tans vision is to turn Cardiff into a club bigger than the likes of Man United and Liverpool? And failure to do so will probably kill the club.
So, which do you think is the most likely outcome?
Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:06 pm
Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:19 pm
AskJeeves wrote:But in order to pull it off the clubs stature must be bigger than the likes of man united etc.
Nope
My question stands, what's more likely and given the outcome if it fails there's the answer as to why some arent giddy that we have just given out a £5m deal.
Its Tans money why should we worry
Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:24 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:AskJeeves wrote:But in order to pull it off the clubs stature must be bigger than the likes of man united etc.
Nope
well, yes. The aim is to become a super power in these countries which is the only way to get enough financial reward to wipe out the deficit and then go on to put us into the black. We are charged with £120 million of debt but on order to service that even slightly we must operate at a profit wiping out our £25m a year shortfall. QPR play in red, have a Malaysian owner of higher profile and regularly seek advertising at promotion in Asia, plus they have a red away kit - is it doing them much good? Not really, as they are competing wi the likes of man united.
My question stands, what's more likely and given the outcome if it fails there's the answer as to why some arent giddy that we have just given out a £5m deal.
Its Tans money why should we worry
like it was SAMs money? The debt is charged to us at a rate of the whole sum plus 7% interest,
Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:12 pm
GrangeEndStar wrote:Glanced at the first sentence and was immediately bored. I would worry about your own wage bill, or the lack of it if I were you, you swivelling little tw*t. Yawn.
Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:22 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:AskJeeves wrote:Any sensible debate welcome.
you're a big poo poo head
Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:31 pm
Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:19 pm
toshacks_1_tales wrote:It says in the (op) that the transfer fee was the shrewd part of the business. The wage was speculation based on the players previous wage.
Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:48 pm
Gavlar wrote:Cryogenic freezing wrote:rhyswales wrote:i agree, i was thinking the same, if we go up we will be fav to come back down, and if we do come down we are in big trouble! like charlton, portsmouth, leeds a few seasons ago... we could be the next team in trouble with our wage bill and massive debt.
Absolutely, and our debt figure to income figure is far far worse than any of the clubs you mention above.
People are urging me to rejoice and stop worrying, when looking at the facts it's very hard to.
What's the solution then?